soles

soles — CS2 Stats

BN76561199228604358[U:1:1268338630]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,848Tracked matches60%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,848 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,827 +0 16 Sept – 4 Nov · 3 observations
1,8271,827peak 1,82716 Sept4 Nov
1,827Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-09-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,827
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 174 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-16
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-16

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsolesPEAK ELO1,827csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning75
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–36–6Last 10058%Win rateTWTTWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −5.0pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–0–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 479ms

Last 10

  • 4–3–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 455ms

Last 20

  • 10–7–3 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 465ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim9.5
Utility6.3
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels7.5
Clutch5.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 73% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 73% on T to 58% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning7.5
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels8.4
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time424ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 457ms → last ⅓ avg 424ms
Headshot accuracy25.5%−4.2%
first ⅓ avg 29.7% → last ⅓ avg 25.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 29 Oct →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–9 · inferno, 6 Oct →
289msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · inferno, 6 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 22 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
6–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

rush_001Best map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2413–1154%0.04
cacheA1811–761%0.06
ancientB115–645%0.08
nukeA106–460%0.07
vertigoA106–460%0.05
anubisB84–450%0.06
dust2S64–267%0.06
rush_001S54–180%0.04
train—32–167%0.07
mirage—31–233%0.05
overpass—22–0100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

143Matches
59%Win rate
1.42Avg K/D
93.8ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3161%1.3517.4
Inferno2665%1.4820.4
Anubis2662%1.3819.9
Dust22528%1.1415.8
Ancient1979%1.6221.1
Nuke1267%1.8423.2
Vertigo250%0.9213.0
Cache250%1.8826.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
6.4°Preaim
427msReaction time
72.7%T opening success
57.6%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
9.83HE damage / grenade
9.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–80.0218%29 Oct →
inferno9–40.2611%29 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0726%28 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0539%28 Oct →
nuke9–70.0726%27 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.1039%24 Oct →
rush_0017–30.0331%14 Oct →
inferno13–70.0316%14 Oct →
inferno2–130.0124%14 Oct →
ancient7–130.0515%13 Oct →
vertigo8–13-0.0034%13 Oct →
vertigo13–100.0328%13 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.018%13 Oct →
rush_0018–60.1936%12 Oct →
rush_0015–80.0450%12 Oct →
rush_0016–2-0.0329%12 Oct →
inferno13–50.0827%11 Oct →
vertigo13–70.0529%11 Oct →
ancient1–130.0327%11 Oct →
cache8–130.0427%11 Oct →
vertigo9–130.0621%9 Oct →
cache13–30.0836%9 Oct →
cache13–30.0729%9 Oct →
vertigo6–130.0526%9 Oct →
ancient10–130.1224%9 Oct →
cache13–80.0929%9 Oct →
inferno13–110.0715%9 Oct →
train10–00.0929%9 Oct →
train7–130.1016%8 Oct →
train13–10.0329%8 Oct →
cache7–130.0023%8 Oct →
vertigo1–130.000%7 Oct →
inferno13–100.0324%7 Oct →
nuke8–10.0537%7 Oct →
dust213–110.0623%6 Oct →
anubis6–130.0820%6 Oct →
dust213–80.0724%6 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.22100%6 Oct →
inferno9–60.2444%6 Oct →
overpass9–20.0838%6 Oct →
inferno13–70.1029%6 Oct →
mirage13–20.0717%6 Oct →
dust213–40.1137%4 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0244%4 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0033%4 Oct →
vertigo13–110.0829%4 Oct →
vertigo13–60.0132%4 Oct →
dust213–70.1126%3 Oct →
dust28–130.0430%3 Oct →
anubis2–70.0316%3 Oct →
anubis8–130.0139%3 Oct →
nuke13–100.0621%2 Oct →
rush_0015–1-0.0325%1 Oct →
inferno7–130.0526%30 Sept →
ancient10–130.0726%30 Sept →
nuke13–100.0724%29 Sept →
nuke11–130.0629%29 Sept →
inferno13–60.0916%29 Sept →
nuke13–90.1024%29 Sept →
nuke13–70.1124%28 Sept →
nuke8–130.0534%28 Sept →
cache13–50.1026%28 Sept →
cache8–130.0425%27 Sept →
ancient13–20.2132%26 Sept →
inferno12–120.1219%26 Sept →
cache13–60.1334%26 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0022%26 Sept →
mirage4–130.0217%24 Sept →
vertigo13–90.1342%23 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0734%23 Sept →
inferno13–00.1434%22 Sept →
inferno8–10.0723%22 Sept →
ancient13–40.0222%22 Sept →
cache13–110.0018%22 Sept →
cache13–90.0630%22 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0029%22 Sept →
inferno13–40.0617%22 Sept →
inferno13–40.0032%22 Sept →
cache13–30.0416%22 Sept →
ancient13–60.0625%22 Sept →
ancient13–60.1030%17 Sept →
anubis12–120.1029%16 Sept →
anubis13–10.1118%16 Sept →
cache11–130.0421%15 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.1044%14 Sept →
cache13–90.0330%14 Sept →
ancient13–40.1637%13 Sept →
inferno13–30.0935%13 Sept →
inferno11–130.0624%13 Sept →
cache12–120.0021%13 Sept →
inferno10–130.0334%12 Sept →
anubis13–100.0519%11 Sept →
ancient3–130.0242%11 Sept →
cache13–100.0229%11 Sept →
mirage8–130.0740%11 Sept →
overpass13–00.0850%9 Sept →
cache13–90.1036%8 Sept →
nuke6–130.1143%8 Sept →
cache9–130.1439%7 Sept →
anubis13–80.1224%7 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.