☭

— CS2 Stats

FR76561199227871428[U:1:1267605700]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

341Tracked matches50%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,035Hours in CS37Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 30 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,543 +1,011 28 Jun4 Jul · 3 days played
11,53212,543peak 12,54328 Jun4 Jul
12,683Peak Premier in tracked matches
37Days played since 2026-03-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches7
Win rate71%
K/D1.97
Headshot %69%

Measured 9 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,413), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate74.1%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy0.2%11.2%12.0%11.8% short
Kill/death ratio2.071.001.02above
Match win rate43.4%43.9%44.7%1.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning42
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53425Last 10053%Win rateWLLLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · +66ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility4.0
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.2
Utility4.0
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time612ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 679ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+5.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 2–6 · nuke, 15 Jun
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–8 · anubis, 13 Aug
422msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · ancient, 2 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 13 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 86% over 7ancientWeakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB22111150%-0.01
ancientC1871139%-0.00
dust2C167944%0.02
nukeS1510567%0.01
anubisC73443%-0.01
overpassS76186%0.02
mirageS54180%0.01
vertigo41325%-0.04
inferno330100%0.05
train31233%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

53,517Lifetime kills
2.07K/D · Top 5% of Level 4 players
723Matches
43.4%Match win rate
74.1%Headshot % · Top 1% of Level 4 players
0.2%Shot accuracy
1,260MVPs
498Hours (in match)
476Bombs planted
120Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,161dust2
692nuke
573inferno
464vertigo
371train
13italy
2lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

114Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
76.9ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22843%1.0115.7
Ancient2446%0.8914.3
Mirage1346%0.8413.5
Train1173%1.1115.6
Overpass1164%0.9713.2
Nuke838%0.9313.0
Inferno862%1.6816.6
Cache743%1.0719.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
76.9%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
612msReaction time
20.3%T opening success
44.5%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
6.72HE damage / grenade
8.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.2695% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–4-0.0013%10 Sept
dust24–13-0.0418%9 Sept
dust29–13-0.0127%7 Sept
ancient11–130.0415%2 Sept
cache10–13-0.0221%31 Aug
dust213–20.0012%31 Aug
nuke13–50.0324%29 Aug
mirage13–100.0519%29 Aug
cache10–13-0.0214%29 Aug
cache13–9-0.0529%29 Aug
ancient8–130.0211%18 Aug
anubis0–8-0.0550%13 Aug
mirage13–1-0.0113%13 Aug
dust25–13-0.099%13 Aug
cache13–40.0216%12 Aug
ancient13–90.0716%12 Aug
ancient13–50.0618%12 Aug
ancient0–5-0.0211%12 Aug
nuke5–9-0.0514%11 Aug
dust213–80.0920%11 Aug
dust27–130.1117%11 Aug
vertigo8–8-0.0721%8 Jul
dust23–130.0224%6 Jul
inferno13–110.0525%6 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0218%6 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0012%4 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0838%4 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0316%4 Jul
cache3–8-0.0425%1 Jul
cache9–10.028%1 Jul
cache13–30.0116%1 Jul
ancient14–160.0613%29 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0125%29 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0618%29 Jun
inferno13–50.0616%29 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0239%29 Jun
nuke13–3-0.0227%29 Jun
anubis13–6-0.019%28 Jun
overpass13–60.0426%28 Jun
ancient13–40.0214%28 Jun
dust213–110.0914%28 Jun
inferno13–30.0419%28 Jun
overpass13–70.0511%28 Jun
overpass13–20.075%28 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0414%27 Jun
cache7–130.0419%26 Jun
cache12–12-0.015%23 Jun
anubis4–60.028%22 Jun
cache0–5-0.0915%21 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0216%21 Jun
dust213–110.029%18 Jun
nuke4–130.0018%18 Jun
ancient10–13-0.038%18 Jun
anubis13–80.068%18 Jun
ancient6–130.0019%17 Jun
nuke13–100.0613%16 Jun
ancient5–6-0.030%15 Jun
nuke13–60.018%15 Jun
cache13–10-0.063%15 Jun
nuke2–60.118%15 Jun
overpass13–10.0811%15 Jun
cache13–100.0115%14 Jun
dust213–20.0420%14 Jun
train13–9-0.0110%14 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0110%14 Jun
cache8–13-0.0315%13 Jun
dust29–130.0316%13 Jun
train8–13-0.0013%13 Jun
vertigo13–100.0518%13 Jun
mirage0–13-0.028%13 Jun
ancient13–40.019%12 Jun
overpass4–13-0.1212%12 Jun
cache13–110.0618%12 Jun
cache3–13-0.0311%11 Jun
nuke13–60.028%11 Jun
overpass13–60.0418%11 Jun
cache13–70.0211%11 Jun
vertigo9–13-0.0620%9 Jun
overpass13–40.0014%9 Jun
cache6–130.0422%9 Jun
nuke13–70.0815%9 Jun
ancient11–13-0.016%9 Jun
cache13–8-0.0214%9 Jun
train1–6-0.0517%8 Jun
mirage13–50.0316%8 Jun
dust212–12-0.0417%8 Jun
cache13–6-0.0213%8 Jun
cache6–13-0.0111%8 Jun
cache4–11-0.130%4 May
nuke5–8-0.0350%3 Apr
nuke13–80.0213%2 Apr
dust212–120.0224%1 Apr
nuke9–7-0.0010%1 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0713%1 Apr
dust213–50.0515%31 Mar
vertigo7–13-0.0710%31 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0510%30 Mar
dust212–12-0.065%30 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0513%30 Mar
dust213–20.0611%30 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →