cap0__

cap0__ — CS2 Stats

SM76561199224792881[U:1:1264527153]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

533Tracked matches37%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6 · 414 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (52 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 414 → 414
+43Tracked matches · now 533
−6.7ppWin rate · 43.3% → 36.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,551 +8,669 7 Feb – 6 Jul · 37 days played
2,17513,551peak 13,5517 Feb6 Jul
Faceit ELO: 414 +0 13 Sept – 23 Sept · 3 observations
414414peak 41413 Sept23 Sept
13,912Peak Premier in tracked matches
414Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
75Days played since 2026-01-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 414
  • Next: Level 2 at 501 — 87 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcap0__FACEITLevel 6 · 414 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO414csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning50
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–54–2Last 10044%Win rateLWWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −3.3pp headshot accuracy · −29ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility4.0
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.0
Utility4.0
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time542ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 25 Apr →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · ancient, 19 Apr →
375msFastest reaction time · 16–14 · dust2, 2 Apr →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 2 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
12–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 15ancientWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2210–1245%-0.00
ancientD186–1233%-0.00
dust2C177–1041%0.00
nukeS1510–567%0.03
anubisC104–640%0.01
infernoC73–443%0.00
overpass—42–250%0.01
cache—30–30%-0.05
vertigo—32–167%0.00
poseidon—10–10%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

927Matches
46%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
79.8ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage22948%1.0615.6
Dust217751%1.0916.0
Ancient11646%1.0115.8
Anubis9841%1.0415.6
Nuke7650%1.1316.8
Inferno6843%0.9514.0
Cache4353%1.2415.2
Overpass944%0.8313.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
68.3%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
532msReaction time
39.7%T opening success
35.1%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
7.46HE damage / grenade
11.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3939 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.7244% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.078%10 Nov →
ancient13–5-0.0018%31 Oct →
dust213–110.0115%11 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0222%11 Oct →
mirage7–130.0110%23 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0713%17 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0314%11 Sept →
ancient13–60.0016%2 Sept →
inferno8–130.0124%27 Aug →
dust213–30.0424%20 Aug →
vertigo13–3-0.0116%20 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0511%19 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0616%18 Aug →
vertigo13–110.0522%17 Aug →
vertigo11–13-0.0419%6 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0726%22 Jul →
ancient13–160.0020%13 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0124%11 Jul →
mirage13–80.0318%9 Jul →
dust28–130.0024%9 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0322%6 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0623%6 Jul →
ancient13–70.0230%6 Jul →
dust213–60.0629%5 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0327%4 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0228%3 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0017%3 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0228%1 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0219%1 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0216%1 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.0121%30 Jun →
overpass10–13-0.0026%25 Jun →
inferno13–110.0021%24 Jun →
nuke13–20.0317%24 Jun →
nuke13–70.0216%23 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0719%18 Jun →
mirage13–100.0519%16 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0124%16 Jun →
overpass13–50.0315%14 Jun →
cache9–13-0.0712%11 Jun →
anubis9–130.0414%4 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0424%3 Jun →
cache8–13-0.0612%2 Jun →
dust213–60.0129%2 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0518%25 May →
inferno11–13-0.0225%18 May →
ancient5–13-0.069%18 May →
ancient5–130.0215%17 May →
overpass5–130.0114%15 May →
anubis7–13-0.0118%9 May →
anubis6–13-0.0515%8 May →
mirage13–5-0.0015%3 May →
ancient10–130.0114%26 Apr →
anubis13–40.1030%25 Apr →
anubis15–150.0423%24 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0319%20 Apr →
inferno13–40.0723%20 Apr →
nuke13–110.0424%20 Apr →
ancient13–70.0640%19 Apr →
mirage16–140.0223%19 Apr →
nuke13–70.0518%19 Apr →
nuke13–30.0419%18 Apr →
mirage12–160.0025%17 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0315%17 Apr →
overpass13–40.027%12 Apr →
dust212–160.0319%11 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0327%9 Apr →
ancient16–14-0.0217%6 Apr →
nuke13–90.0522%5 Apr →
mirage13–90.0315%5 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0115%5 Apr →
nuke11–130.067%4 Apr →
ancient7–130.0213%4 Apr →
dust213–3-0.0022%4 Apr →
anubis13–50.0414%4 Apr →
anubis13–90.0313%4 Apr →
poseidon5–90.1018%3 Apr →
dust216–140.0216%2 Apr →
nuke13–110.0515%27 Mar →
inferno13–20.0217%27 Mar →
nuke11–130.0421%22 Mar →
mirage15–15-0.0514%22 Mar →
mirage13–110.0816%13 Mar →
dust213–40.0822%12 Mar →
nuke8–13-0.0013%9 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0016%7 Mar →
mirage13–10.0312%2 Mar →
mirage10–130.0526%1 Mar →
dust29–130.0117%27 Feb →
ancient5–130.0423%26 Feb →
mirage11–130.0417%25 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0115%23 Feb →
nuke13–80.0316%22 Feb →
ancient3–13-0.0322%20 Feb →
ancient11–130.0219%19 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.059%18 Feb →
anubis2–13-0.0525%14 Feb →
ancient8–13-0.0219%7 Feb →
nuke13–70.0727%6 Feb →
mirage11–130.0316%29 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.