nilsdi

nilsdi — CS2 Stats

IL76561199195974138[U:1:1235708410]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

488Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,351 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,560 -1,723 26 Feb – 5 Jul · 29 days played
17,76320,283peak 20,28326 Feb5 Jul
20,283Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,351Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2026-02-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,351
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 180 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnilsdiFACEITLevel 7 · 1,351 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,351csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning46
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateWLWWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.11
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.7
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning4.6
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06+0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.06
Reaction time582ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 9 Mar →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · dust2, 2 Apr →
391msFastest reaction time · 5–9 · inferno, 27 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 14 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 20infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3416–1847%0.05
ancientA2012–860%0.04
nukeB1910–953%0.05
dust2C104–640%0.04
infernoD71–614%0.02
anubisB63–350%-0.02
cache—21–150%0.03
vertigo—11–0100%0.10
overpass—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

127Matches
52%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
94.5ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
37%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4163%1.4918.4
Nuke2070%1.5722.6
Ancient1850%1.3519.2
Inferno425%1.1824.8
Anubis425%0.9715.0
Dust2333%1.2320.3
Train10%1.1820.0
Vertigo10%1.3320.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
42.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.9%Spray accuracy
84.8%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
592msReaction time
26.6%T opening success
39.6%CT opening success
0.79Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
6.88HE damage / grenade
10.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.5508% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0913%23 Oct →
inferno6–90.0824%21 Oct →
ancient13–70.1721%12 Oct →
mirage13–110.0518%5 Oct →
mirage9–130.1820%21 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.0815%2 Sept →
nuke7–90.1310%27 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.0130%27 Aug →
mirage13–50.1215%26 Aug →
mirage13–10.1423%22 Aug →
dust24–130.0611%21 Aug →
mirage7–130.0113%19 Aug →
mirage11–130.0918%18 Aug →
dust213–00.1128%14 Aug →
nuke13–100.0118%12 Aug →
nuke13–80.0022%12 Aug →
mirage12–120.1615%11 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0313%11 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0214%11 Aug →
mirage10–130.1124%9 Aug →
dust21–130.0417%9 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0322%5 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0019%5 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0210%4 Jul →
ancient13–40.1412%4 Jul →
nuke16–140.108%4 Jul →
cache13–110.0721%1 May →
ancient16–130.0310%23 Apr →
anubis13–3-0.0415%13 Apr →
inferno9–20.0921%11 Apr →
mirage10–130.058%5 Apr →
mirage13–10.0813%3 Apr →
mirage11–130.0321%2 Apr →
dust23–00.1233%2 Apr →
nuke13–110.0520%30 Mar →
vertigo13–80.1017%27 Mar →
dust213–100.0421%26 Mar →
nuke11–13-0.0119%25 Mar →
ancient9–130.0814%22 Mar →
mirage13–60.0221%22 Mar →
ancient13–60.0721%21 Mar →
mirage12–120.1720%21 Mar →
inferno6–130.0222%20 Mar →
nuke13–60.0930%20 Mar →
anubis9–130.0317%20 Mar →
nuke13–20.1623%20 Mar →
mirage13–3-0.0113%20 Mar →
mirage13–100.0913%20 Mar →
mirage13–60.038%20 Mar →
nuke9–130.0229%19 Mar →
mirage13–80.017%19 Mar →
dust212–120.0016%18 Mar →
nuke9–130.0321%18 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.0414%17 Mar →
ancient13–110.0911%17 Mar →
ancient13–110.0515%17 Mar →
nuke9–130.0318%16 Mar →
dust211–130.0416%16 Mar →
ancient11–130.0323%15 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.0311%15 Mar →
ancient13–90.0414%14 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.038%14 Mar →
mirage13–50.029%14 Mar →
dust213–2-0.018%14 Mar →
nuke10–13-0.0114%13 Mar →
nuke13–9-0.0217%13 Mar →
ancient7–130.0628%12 Mar →
mirage5–13-0.0116%12 Mar →
inferno4–130.1019%11 Mar →
mirage13–50.0611%11 Mar →
nuke13–20.2128%9 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.0413%9 Mar →
dust28–130.0125%8 Mar →
anubis13–6-0.028%8 Mar →
mirage5–13-0.025%7 Mar →
anubis4–13-0.0614%7 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0221%7 Mar →
ancient12–16-0.0419%6 Mar →
mirage4–13-0.0512%6 Mar →
nuke13–40.0720%6 Mar →
mirage13–60.0610%5 Mar →
mirage13–40.0510%5 Mar →
nuke13–10.1123%5 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0612%4 Mar →
ancient16–140.0028%4 Mar →
ancient13–7-0.0517%3 Mar →
overpass7–13-0.0317%3 Mar →
mirage10–130.0932%3 Mar →
anubis13–9-0.0320%2 Mar →
mirage13–80.1016%2 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0421%2 Mar →
nuke8–130.0216%1 Mar →
anubis7–13-0.0314%28 Feb →
ancient13–20.0222%28 Feb →
ancient13–80.0915%28 Feb →
ancient7–130.0010%27 Feb →
ancient13–80.0417%27 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0129%27 Feb →
mirage9–130.0316%27 Feb →
nuke6–13-0.0216%26 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.