kyzz

kyzz — CS2 Stats

FR76561199189632962[U:1:1229367234]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,987Tracked matches68%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,062Top 50% of 208,191 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#54422 of 255771 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,015 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,062 -1,243 4 Sept – 18 Oct · 9 days played
22,06224,999peak 24,9994 Sept18 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,015 +0 4 Sept – 15 Sept · 3 observations
2,0152,015peak 2,0154 Sept15 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,015Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
18Days played since 2026-09-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,015
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 485 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,937 below peak (24,999)
  • -2,937 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,938 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkyzzFACEITLevel 9 · 2,015 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,062 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,015csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning54
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–33–9Last 10058%Win rateWTWWLLLTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · −4ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 5–3–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility6.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.4
Utility6.7
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time565ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 539ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−4.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 4 Oct →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · cache, 5 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · cache, 3 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · train, 5 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 86% over 7anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA5028–2256%0.03
infernoB137–654%0.01
anubisD93–633%0.00
vertigoS75–271%0.00
trainS76–186%0.04
dust2A53–260%0.06
ancient—44–0100%0.01
nuke—21–150%0.01
office—21–150%0.15
mirage—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

861Matches
51%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
77.6ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust223855%1.2216.8
Anubis11646%1.2316.1
Inferno11551%1.1214.7
Ancient11246%1.0915.8
Nuke11053%1.1715.8
Mirage9246%1.0415.1
Train3129%1.0415.0
Vertigo2572%1.5719.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
73.8%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
551msReaction time
31.0%T opening success
50.1%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
9.46HE damage / grenade
11.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.0284% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–5-0.0216%19 Oct →
inferno12–12-0.0520%19 Oct →
cache13–60.0320%19 Oct →
dust29–3-0.067%19 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0516%18 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0110%18 Oct →
inferno10–130.0218%18 Oct →
inferno12–120.0023%18 Oct →
anubis13–20.1019%18 Oct →
cache13–100.0416%18 Oct →
train13–110.0225%18 Oct →
ancient13–20.0217%18 Oct →
inferno13–90.0137%17 Oct →
vertigo11–13-0.0116%17 Oct →
cache3–8-0.050%17 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0218%17 Oct →
cache13–110.0318%17 Oct →
cache7–10.0914%17 Oct →
vertigo13–50.0323%16 Oct →
inferno7–130.0529%16 Oct →
vertigo2–13-0.0521%16 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0523%16 Oct →
nuke13–40.0316%16 Oct →
inferno13–20.0328%16 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0325%16 Oct →
train13–10.0114%15 Oct →
vertigo13–3-0.0113%15 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0529%15 Oct →
ancient13–30.0211%15 Oct →
inferno13–50.0620%15 Oct →
cache12–120.0026%15 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0111%15 Oct →
cache13–110.0719%15 Oct →
cache13–70.1325%15 Oct →
inferno13–70.0432%15 Oct →
cache11–130.0018%14 Oct →
anubis8–130.0428%14 Oct →
inferno13–60.0316%14 Oct →
inferno13–50.0718%14 Oct →
anubis12–12-0.0215%13 Oct →
vertigo13–7-0.0423%13 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0135%13 Oct →
dust213–70.0827%12 Oct →
ancient13–70.0424%12 Oct →
cache1–13-0.0223%12 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0023%11 Oct →
train13–30.0720%11 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0133%11 Oct →
cache11–130.0514%11 Oct →
dust212–120.0916%11 Oct →
cache13–80.0416%11 Oct →
cache13–60.0318%11 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0227%11 Oct →
cache13–70.0511%9 Oct →
cache13–60.0720%9 Oct →
cache12–120.0526%9 Oct →
cache13–60.0723%8 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0633%8 Oct →
cache3–130.0111%8 Oct →
cache12–120.0821%8 Oct →
cache11–8-0.0213%7 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0420%7 Oct →
cache13–80.0426%7 Oct →
cache11–130.0621%7 Oct →
anubis13–20.0315%7 Oct →
vertigo13–90.1015%6 Oct →
inferno10–130.0020%6 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0324%6 Oct →
cache6–130.0317%6 Oct →
cache13–90.0421%6 Oct →
cache6–130.0222%6 Oct →
cache5–130.0419%6 Oct →
cache13–80.0126%6 Oct →
train13–00.0140%5 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0215%5 Oct →
cache5–130.0042%5 Oct →
dust213–80.0725%5 Oct →
cache13–90.0127%5 Oct →
dust212–120.1127%4 Oct →
office13–30.2120%4 Oct →
cache3–130.0815%4 Oct →
cache13–30.2128%4 Oct →
train12–12-0.0520%4 Oct →
anubis13–2-0.0317%4 Oct →
cache13–40.0416%4 Oct →
office5–130.1033%3 Oct →
train13–30.1038%3 Oct →
cache2–13-0.119%3 Oct →
train13–30.0923%2 Oct →
cache13–90.0129%2 Oct →
cache13–40.0117%2 Oct →
cache13–70.0625%2 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0123%2 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0119%2 Oct →
cache13–90.0423%2 Oct →
cache13–100.1027%2 Oct →
cache13–50.0822%2 Oct →
cache11–130.0117%2 Oct →
cache13–70.0229%1 Oct →
cache13–80.0425%1 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.