Stu Pidman

Stu Pidman — CS2 Stats

76561199188610698[U:1:1228344970]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

256Tracked matches33%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAll-Rounder
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,000 +267 15 Sept – 23 Aug · 26 days played
9,62816,265peak 16,26515 Sept23 Aug
16,382Peak Premier in tracked matches
46Days played since 2025-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning66
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–52–3Last 10045%Win rateLLLLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 1–9 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 615ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.0
Utility6.7
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels6.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.6
Utility6.7
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time615ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 669ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 25 Jul →
51%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · inferno, 27 Jun →
445msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 26 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 24 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L6Current streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC3514–2140%0.03
mirageB157–847%0.05
anubisD124–833%0.05
ancientB115–645%0.05
cacheA106–460%0.09
nukeC94–544%0.03
overpassS64–267%0.07
vertigo—21–150%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
87.3%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
611msReaction time
38.7%T opening success
61.7%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
17.2%Flash assists
10.39HE damage / grenade
7.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.7102% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–130.0720%4 Oct →
ancient4–130.1443%4 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0023%23 Aug →
cache10–130.0621%23 Aug →
inferno10–130.0221%15 Aug →
ancient11–130.0420%15 Aug →
inferno13–90.0331%11 Aug →
anubis4–130.0223%10 Aug →
nuke1–13-0.0721%10 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0423%2 Aug →
inferno9–130.0936%2 Aug →
mirage13–160.0013%1 Aug →
cache13–90.2115%1 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0319%26 Jul →
anubis13–3-0.0219%25 Jul →
cache13–50.2726%25 Jul →
mirage7–130.0127%23 Jul →
anubis10–130.0224%19 Jul →
mirage13–30.0016%19 Jul →
mirage13–30.1932%17 Jul →
ancient8–130.0615%17 Jul →
nuke4–130.0115%16 Jul →
anubis7–130.1523%16 Jul →
inferno13–50.1333%16 Jul →
anubis7–130.0122%16 Jul →
anubis5–130.0311%14 Jul →
cache2–13-0.0221%13 Jul →
nuke13–90.1029%13 Jul →
cache16–140.0226%11 Jul →
inferno13–80.0828%11 Jul →
ancient10–130.0227%11 Jul →
inferno13–90.0824%11 Jul →
mirage15–150.0619%11 Jul →
inferno13–100.1323%10 Jul →
cache13–110.1324%10 Jul →
cache13–70.1516%10 Jul →
inferno9–130.0422%5 Jul →
anubis13–110.0017%5 Jul →
overpass13–110.1420%4 Jul →
anubis7–130.0220%4 Jul →
inferno11–130.0525%3 Jul →
anubis13–50.1825%3 Jul →
mirage13–60.0118%2 Jul →
overpass6–130.0327%2 Jul →
inferno7–130.0527%2 Jul →
mirage10–130.1332%2 Jul →
mirage13–40.0418%27 Jun →
inferno13–50.0951%27 Jun →
inferno13–50.1825%26 Jun →
anubis13–20.1518%26 Jun →
mirage16–140.0822%23 Jun →
inferno13–70.1221%22 Jun →
inferno6–130.1131%21 Jun →
mirage6–130.0414%21 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0516%20 Jun →
inferno3–13-0.0629%20 Jun →
inferno14–160.0113%14 Jun →
cache13–100.1023%9 May →
inferno13–80.0619%11 Nov →
inferno7–9-0.0533%11 Nov →
inferno13–40.0623%11 Nov →
inferno6–130.0523%11 Nov →
nuke13–9-0.0413%9 Nov →
nuke9–130.0733%2 Nov →
mirage7–130.0019%2 Nov →
inferno4–13-0.0425%30 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0221%30 Oct →
vertigo12–12-0.0033%26 Oct →
vertigo13–50.1421%26 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0610%26 Oct →
mirage13–40.0123%23 Oct →
inferno8–130.0726%19 Oct →
mirage13–100.0624%19 Oct →
overpass13–70.1131%19 Oct →
nuke13–80.1329%19 Oct →
ancient13–70.1217%19 Oct →
inferno13–60.1220%18 Oct →
overpass13–60.0215%18 Oct →
ancient13–30.0515%18 Oct →
inferno10–130.1020%18 Oct →
mirage11–130.0120%18 Oct →
inferno13–100.0319%18 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.0329%11 Oct →
mirage6–130.1236%11 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.155%29 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.1023%27 Sept →
overpass15–150.0621%27 Sept →
ancient13–80.0815%27 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0228%24 Sept →
ancient13–00.0629%24 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0214%23 Sept →
overpass13–60.0727%21 Sept →
nuke13–60.0929%21 Sept →
inferno4–130.0025%18 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0118%18 Sept →
ancient6–130.0136%16 Sept →
nuke5–130.0121%16 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0118%16 Sept →
inferno0–4-0.120%15 Sept →
ancient13–10.0231%15 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.