Schwarzenegger

Schwarzenegger — CS2 Stats

AR76561199183690937[U:1:1223425209]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,836Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 3 · 803 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (57 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 803 → 803
+92Tracked matches · now 1,836
+7.4ppWin rate · 46.2% → 53.6%

Rating over time

803Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-09-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 803
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 98 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSchwarzeneggerFACEITLevel 3 · 803 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPEAK ELO803csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning52
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–40–9Last 10051%Win rateTLWWLTWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +8.1pp headshot accuracy · −36ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 10

  • 5–3–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility5.8
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch0.0

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 53% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning5.2
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time615ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 24 Sept →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · anubis, 11 Nov →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · mirage, 3 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 4 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7vertigoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2915–1452%-0.04
mirageA2715–1256%-0.05
anubisC104–640%-0.05
infernoA95–456%-0.02
vertigoD93–633%-0.06
nukeS75–271%-0.04
cache—30–30%-0.07
ancient—31–233%-0.03
overpass—22–0100%-0.01
train—11–0100%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

25Matches
44%Win rate
0.58Avg K/D
62.5ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

12%1v1 clutch win
50%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1443%0.6010.9
Dust2540%0.5810.4
Inferno250%0.285.0
Nuke10%0.6712.0
Ancient1100%0.5010.0
Vertigo10%0.6813.0
Anubis1100%0.8117.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
29.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.9%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
601msReaction time
52.8%T opening success
37.3%CT opening success
0.81Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
12.07HE damage / grenade
4.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.2952% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache12–12-0.0524%12 Nov →
anubis4–13-0.0624%12 Nov →
inferno13–10-0.0422%11 Nov →
anubis13–3-0.0142%11 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0717%10 Nov →
ancient12–120.0020%10 Nov →
anubis13–9-0.0825%10 Nov →
dust213–6-0.0421%10 Nov →
dust213–9-0.0417%10 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0320%7 Nov →
dust26–13-0.058%6 Nov →
inferno13–8-0.0113%6 Nov →
mirage4–13-0.0624%6 Nov →
inferno10–13-0.0413%6 Nov →
mirage11–13-0.1012%5 Nov →
overpass13–3-0.0115%4 Nov →
nuke13–1-0.0216%4 Nov →
vertigo13–8-0.0635%4 Nov →
cache5–13-0.076%3 Nov →
inferno5–13-0.037%26 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0820%25 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0711%25 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0115%25 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.106%24 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0618%24 Oct →
dust26–13-0.1115%22 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0511%21 Oct →
inferno13–100.0022%21 Oct →
dust213–70.0024%20 Oct →
dust213–80.0722%20 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0325%19 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0315%19 Oct →
inferno16–13-0.0210%19 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0811%19 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0519%17 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0314%15 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.1017%15 Oct →
train13–11-0.0710%13 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0515%13 Oct →
inferno13–40.0122%12 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0820%12 Oct →
anubis12–12-0.0112%10 Oct →
vertigo13–10.0012%10 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0421%8 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0913%8 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0412%8 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0529%7 Oct →
dust213–5-0.087%5 Oct →
nuke13–40.0120%5 Oct →
ancient13–2-0.0125%5 Oct →
mirage13–40.0217%5 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0315%5 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0513%4 Oct →
overpass13–11-0.0124%4 Oct →
mirage13–0-0.0221%4 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0112%4 Oct →
mirage13–30.0713%3 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0210%3 Oct →
dust27–13-0.079%3 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.118%2 Oct →
dust213–70.0012%2 Oct →
dust213–110.0030%1 Oct →
vertigo13–8-0.0927%1 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0830%1 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.007%1 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0410%1 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0712%1 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0515%1 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0217%1 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0813%30 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0715%30 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0316%30 Sept →
vertigo7–13-0.085%29 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.109%29 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.106%27 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0419%25 Sept →
vertigo1–90.0110%25 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0912%25 Sept →
cache7–13-0.097%24 Sept →
dust213–50.0924%24 Sept →
vertigo0–9-0.070%24 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.098%24 Sept →
vertigo2–13-0.0729%23 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0616%23 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.0721%23 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0440%23 Sept →
mirage13–40.0418%23 Sept →
anubis12–12-0.0120%23 Sept →
nuke13–2-0.0315%21 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0219%21 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0713%20 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0413%20 Sept →
mirage13–1-0.1014%16 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0313%15 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0226%15 Sept →
mirage3–130.0012%14 Sept →
dust21–13-0.1116%14 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0122%13 Sept →
dust210–10.0027%11 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0817%10 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.