Tekielu

Tekielu — CS2 Stats

PL76561199175165673[U:1:1214899945]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

8,507Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#34068 of 40550 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,704 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,704Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,704
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 296 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTekieluFACEITLevel 10 · 2,704 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,704csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning54
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5347Last 10053%Win rateLWWWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression6.0
Utility2.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.4
Utility2.4
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time616ms+46ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy26.0%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.9% → last ⅓ avg 26.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — anubis 11–0
110Biggest win — anubis
5Longest win streak
117In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 42% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA26151158%-0.00
ancientA23131057%-0.01
anubisC1981142%0.01
nukeC146843%-0.00
infernoA117464%-0.01
dust242250%-0.01
cache32167%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,172Matches
50%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
84.9ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage148652%1.1718.2
Ancient108452%1.1818.3
Dust237946%1.0116.6
Nuke35750%1.1417.4
Anubis32847%1.0517.0
Vertigo22049%1.1417.8
Inferno19648%0.9916.1
Overpass6740%0.9816.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
618msReaction time
34.3%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.34Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
8.59HE damage / grenade
1.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3389 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.349% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage2–13-0.0536%28 Aug
anubis13–110.0817%25 Aug
anubis13–40.0435%21 Aug
anubis11–00.1419%21 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0436%20 Aug
inferno13–30.0420%18 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0625%17 Aug
ancient16–130.0228%16 Aug
anubis9–130.0126%15 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0225%14 Aug
nuke11–130.0231%12 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0629%11 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0133%10 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0220%10 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0431%9 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0522%9 Aug
ancient13–90.0536%7 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0221%7 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0228%6 Aug
nuke13–110.0424%6 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0420%4 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0032%3 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0429%2 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0523%1 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0218%1 Aug
anubis13–90.0630%1 Aug
mirage1–13-0.096%30 Jul
anubis16–12-0.0216%29 Jul
mirage13–100.0518%26 Jul
nuke13–100.0318%25 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0532%25 Jul
ancient13–60.0240%24 Jul
inferno13–110.0531%17 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0613%17 Jul
mirage13–60.0923%16 Jul
anubis13–160.0027%16 Jul
inferno10–130.0128%12 Jul
ancient13–80.0140%11 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0127%10 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0229%10 Jul
mirage13–90.0142%9 Jul
cache13–6-0.0426%9 Jul
nuke9–130.0126%9 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0539%9 Jul
cache13–80.0825%9 Jul
cache3–13-0.0340%9 Jul
mirage13–40.0429%8 Jul
mirage13–80.0425%7 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0911%6 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0529%5 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0231%5 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0027%5 Jul
ancient13–110.0125%4 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0121%10 Jun
anubis13–90.0116%10 Jun
anubis9–130.0313%10 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0320%7 Jun
mirage13–80.0224%7 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0333%6 Jun
ancient10–130.0423%5 Jun
ancient13–110.0019%3 Jun
mirage13–40.0319%2 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0124%1 Jun
inferno13–50.0221%30 May
ancient8–13-0.0522%22 May
ancient16–19-0.0719%21 May
inferno13–80.0016%17 May
ancient13–3-0.0036%15 May
inferno11–13-0.0336%14 May
inferno9–13-0.0521%14 May
anubis11–130.0324%12 May
anubis6–13-0.0624%11 May
nuke12–160.0323%9 May
ancient11–130.0623%9 May
nuke5–13-0.0135%8 May
nuke8–130.0234%8 May
anubis10–13-0.0216%6 May
mirage13–100.0534%2 May
ancient8–13-0.0016%2 May
mirage10–130.0320%2 May
dust216–14-0.0322%1 May
anubis8–130.0218%30 Apr
anubis13–90.0929%27 Apr
dust26–130.0020%23 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0614%21 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0326%18 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0518%17 Apr
mirage13–70.0228%15 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0321%12 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0428%12 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0329%12 Apr
inferno13–80.0120%12 Apr
mirage13–110.0020%10 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0213%10 Apr
dust213–60.0221%10 Apr
mirage13–90.1121%8 Apr
dust25–13-0.0328%8 Apr
inferno16–13-0.0620%7 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0333%6 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0117%6 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →