0sku

0sku — CS2 Stats

FI76561199161384231[U:1:1201118503]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,957Tracked matches38%Win rate2022Tracked since
3,160Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,673Purple band · top ~17.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,867 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,673 +1,802 13 Aug – 5 Oct · 25 days played
15,87121,402peak 21,40213 Aug5 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,867 +0 1 Sept – 17 Sept · 4 observations
1,8671,867peak 1,8671 Sept17 Sept
21,522Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,867Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,867
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 134 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,729 below peak (21,402)
  • +39 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,327 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches8——
Win rate38%——
K/D0.94——
Headshot %50%——

Measured 11 Sep 2026 → 13 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,773), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate53.4%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy5.1%13.0%13.3%8.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.081.061.07meets
Match win rate48.8%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG0skuFACEITLevel 8 · 1,867 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER17,673 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,867csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning45
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–51–4Last 10045%Win rateWWLLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · −84ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 692ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 665ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.7
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.5
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time646ms+56ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 646ms
Headshot accuracy29.4%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 31.9% → last ⅓ avg 29.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 22 Aug →
64%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · cache, 13 Aug →
438msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 16 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 22 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 12ancientWeakest map · 20% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD227–1532%-0.00
mirageB2211–1150%-0.02
ancientD153–1220%-0.01
dust2B137–654%-0.01
cacheS128–467%-0.01
infernoA106–460%0.01
anubisB63–350%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

78,304Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
3,686Matches
48.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
53.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
5.1%Shot accuracy
10,742MVPs
1,517Hours (in match)
6,153Bombs planted
800Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,551
AWP15,066
MP91,684
Knife1,146
P2501,091

Lifetime map wins

7,711inferno
6,370nuke
4,527dust2
2,484vertigo
1,198train
57office
21cbble
12lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,034Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
82.9ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17050%1.0317.3
Nuke10254%1.0717.3
Inferno9846%0.9716.0
Ancient7441%0.9615.4
Dust26749%1.0917.1
Vertigo3142%0.9916.4
Anubis2846%0.8714.7
Train1856%1.0615.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.2%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.2%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
636msReaction time
26.0%T opening success
51.9%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
11.8%Flash assists
6.68HE damage / grenade
8.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.9624% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–100.0223%5 Oct →
nuke13–80.0040%5 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0134%5 Oct →
ancient12–16-0.0228%29 Sept →
nuke11–2-0.0436%19 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0425%9 Sept →
ancient11–130.0327%8 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0620%7 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0321%5 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0018%5 Sept →
nuke4–130.0042%5 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0428%4 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.1043%4 Sept →
anubis8–10.0328%4 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0619%4 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.1020%4 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0122%3 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0725%3 Sept →
nuke13–110.0436%3 Sept →
dust213–60.0542%3 Sept →
cache13–30.0534%2 Sept →
cache6–130.0014%2 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0535%1 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0930%31 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0245%30 Aug →
dust214–160.0331%30 Aug →
ancient7–130.0046%30 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0319%30 Aug →
anubis7–130.0324%29 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0437%29 Aug →
nuke8–130.0124%29 Aug →
ancient7–130.0528%29 Aug →
dust25–130.0424%23 Aug →
mirage16–12-0.0033%23 Aug →
inferno13–50.1324%22 Aug →
ancient13–00.0727%22 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0738%22 Aug →
nuke14–160.0127%22 Aug →
dust213–40.0524%21 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0139%20 Aug →
inferno13–50.0423%20 Aug →
nuke5–130.0030%20 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0420%20 Aug →
nuke13–100.0840%20 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0332%20 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0734%20 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0815%19 Aug →
mirage13–20.0630%19 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0042%19 Aug →
nuke6–130.0130%19 Aug →
mirage13–50.0927%19 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0215%19 Aug →
ancient13–10.0520%19 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0338%19 Aug →
anubis13–4-0.0533%19 Aug →
mirage11–130.0353%19 Aug →
nuke13–20.0817%19 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0516%19 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0838%19 Aug →
inferno13–60.0458%19 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0524%19 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0729%18 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0926%18 Aug →
ancient13–110.0038%18 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0540%18 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0226%18 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0333%17 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0314%17 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0442%17 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0136%17 Aug →
inferno13–70.0336%17 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0531%17 Aug →
mirage13–50.0750%17 Aug →
cache13–90.0438%17 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0450%17 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0322%16 Aug →
cache13–90.0327%16 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0622%16 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0817%16 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0345%16 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0336%16 Aug →
ancient9–130.0039%16 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0821%16 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0618%16 Aug →
nuke15–150.0523%16 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0232%16 Aug →
mirage10–130.0430%15 Aug →
anubis16–120.0337%15 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0124%15 Aug →
nuke13–60.1037%14 Aug →
nuke4–130.0540%14 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0324%13 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0414%13 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0211%13 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0227%13 Aug →
dust213–30.0219%13 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0164%13 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0647%13 Aug →
ancient7–130.0438%13 Aug →
mirage13–10.0540%12 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.