SpurdoClan Rami Raminder pelaa

SpurdoClan Rami Raminder pelaa — CS2 Stats

76561199152492863[U:1:1192227135]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

275Tracked matches62%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating9,161Light Blue band · top ~58.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 275 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 26 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,161 +845 26 Feb18 Sept · 16 days played
6,3529,161peak 9,16126 Feb18 Sept
9,161Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2026-02-26

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 9,161
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 839 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSpurdoClan Rami Raminder …FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER9,161 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning48
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53425Last 10053%Win rateWWLLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · +18ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 702ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility3.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.8
Utility3.3
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time600ms+44ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy24.0%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.31Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 22 Mar
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · inferno, 27 Feb
344msFastest reaction time · 9–1 · inferno, 14 Mar
12–0Biggest win · dust2, 26 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 30anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA30181260%0.06
mirageA2011955%0.03
dust2A127558%0.03
nukeC104640%0.03
anubisD62433%0.05
ancientB63350%0.07
overpass32167%0.13
poseidon31233%-0.05
italy2020%-0.07
vertigo21150%0.09
warden21150%-0.01
office1010%0.08
stronghold110100%-0.01
alpine110100%-0.07
sanctum110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

18Matches
39%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
81.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage560%1.0816.2
Ancient40%0.6912.8
Anubis367%1.8218.7
Dust220%0.8013.5
Nuke20%0.7811.0
Overpass1100%2.3023.0
Inferno1100%1.5841.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
87.0%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
603msReaction time
38.9%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
4.18HE damage / grenade
11.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4258 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.9005% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–30.0432%5 Apr
dust216–14-0.029%5 Apr
office2–130.0839%30 Mar
nuke1–130.0217%30 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0319%27 Mar
mirage13–60.1039%27 Mar
mirage12–11-0.0425%27 Mar
italy7–11-0.0514%27 Mar
nuke13–100.0318%26 Mar
anubis9–130.0023%26 Mar
anubis13–40.0535%26 Mar
ancient7–130.1633%26 Mar
dust212–00.128%26 Mar
nuke9–30.1827%26 Mar
stronghold8–0-0.0133%26 Mar
vertigo5–130.0031%26 Mar
italy3–12-0.1012%23 Mar
warden13–3-0.0123%23 Mar
alpine13–2-0.0713%23 Mar
inferno8–80.1718%22 Mar
mirage13–110.1318%22 Mar
dust28–130.0120%22 Mar
inferno9–60.0836%22 Mar
inferno9–20.3133%22 Mar
mirage13–40.0514%15 Mar
inferno6–9-0.0418%15 Mar
inferno9–40.0814%15 Mar
warden8–13-0.0024%15 Mar
nuke13–20.0640%15 Mar
inferno9–60.2022%15 Mar
mirage13–60.0728%14 Mar
inferno2–9-0.1031%14 Mar
inferno7–90.0127%14 Mar
inferno9–40.2324%14 Mar
inferno9–10.1819%14 Mar
inferno13–90.0221%14 Mar
mirage13–90.0421%14 Mar
dust213–80.0929%13 Mar
dust25–130.0525%13 Mar
overpass12–120.0723%13 Mar
inferno9–20.1328%13 Mar
dust216–130.0224%13 Mar
inferno8–80.0618%13 Mar
nuke14–16-0.0115%12 Mar
inferno13–4-0.0114%12 Mar
poseidon4–9-0.0914%12 Mar
mirage13–70.0317%12 Mar
ancient7–130.0120%12 Mar
inferno6–90.0920%11 Mar
inferno9–50.1919%11 Mar
inferno9–40.1917%10 Mar
inferno2–9-0.0318%10 Mar
inferno3–9-0.0113%10 Mar
poseidon9–70.0719%10 Mar
poseidon4–9-0.130%10 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0123%10 Mar
mirage13–100.1517%10 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0412%10 Mar
inferno2–9-0.1711%10 Mar
inferno3–9-0.006%10 Mar
mirage13–110.0217%9 Mar
anubis12–20.1625%9 Mar
nuke5–130.0131%9 Mar
overpass13–70.1120%9 Mar
dust211–13-0.0330%9 Mar
anubis11–130.0320%9 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0114%9 Mar
inferno9–40.1021%9 Mar
mirage13–90.0413%8 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0218%8 Mar
mirage8–130.1125%8 Mar
inferno9–70.0319%8 Mar
mirage2–120.0134%7 Mar
inferno8–130.0823%6 Mar
inferno5–0-0.020%6 Mar
anubis7–130.0426%6 Mar
nuke13–50.0731%6 Mar
mirage10–130.0134%6 Mar
dust213–100.0411%1 Mar
dust29–130.0428%28 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0010%28 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0217%28 Feb
ancient15–150.0916%28 Feb
mirage12–16-0.0320%28 Feb
mirage9–130.0317%28 Feb
inferno2–9-0.1321%28 Feb
vertigo9–30.1715%28 Feb
sanctum9–50.0716%28 Feb
dust213–100.0118%27 Feb
overpass13–70.2022%27 Feb
mirage10–130.059%27 Feb
dust215–15-0.0216%27 Feb
inferno13–2-0.0043%27 Feb
inferno13–90.0416%27 Feb
ancient13–100.0818%27 Feb
nuke13–160.0114%27 Feb
ancient13–90.0525%26 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0613%26 Feb
ancient13–50.0626%26 Feb
inferno9–70.1226%26 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →