gambler0304

gambler0304 — CS2 Stats

DK76561199141656567[U:1:1181390839]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,486Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating3,179Grey band · top ~86.5% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 3,179 +173 19 Sept – 9 Oct · 18 days played
2,1803,451peak 3,45119 Sept9 Oct
3,451Peak Premier in tracked matches
19Days played since 2026-09-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 272 below peak (3,451)
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 1,821 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgambler0304PREMIER3,179 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning41
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–54–1Last 10045%Win rateLLWLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · +71ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 722ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 726ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 690ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.3 against its own average).

Aim4.2
Utility6.7
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 63% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 49% on T to 33% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 701ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning4.1
Utility6.7
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time724ms+46ms
first ⅓ avg 679ms → last ⅓ avg 724ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 26 Sept →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · mirage, 7 Oct →
531msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · inferno, 19 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 2 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 16mirageWeakest map · 29% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD288–2029%-0.00
dust2B2211–1150%0.01
anubisD165–1131%0.00
infernoA1610–663%0.02
ancientA159–660%0.02
nuke—32–167%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 28). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

15Matches
7%Win rate
0.60Avg K/D
62.1ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust240%0.649.5
Anubis425%0.8014.3
Mirage30%0.507.7
Ancient20%0.4610.0
Nuke10%0.152.0
Inferno10%0.6911.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.8%Spray accuracy
74.3%Counter-strafing
12.4°Preaim
701msReaction time
48.7%T opening success
33.1%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
12.46HE damage / grenade
14.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.3718° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 701.4499ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–13-0.0115%9 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0122%9 Oct →
ancient13–70.0715%9 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0217%9 Oct →
ancient13–80.0327%9 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0016%9 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0215%9 Oct →
mirage7–130.0311%9 Oct →
ancient13–100.0724%8 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0533%8 Oct →
inferno13–100.0321%8 Oct →
mirage13–30.0118%8 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0121%7 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0656%7 Oct →
mirage12–100.0219%6 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0617%6 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0515%5 Oct →
inferno11–130.0118%5 Oct →
ancient13–60.0324%4 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.039%4 Oct →
inferno13–90.0320%4 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0115%4 Oct →
nuke11–20.0117%4 Oct →
mirage13–110.0118%3 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0514%3 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.027%3 Oct →
mirage16–140.0210%3 Oct →
dust26–10.1613%3 Oct →
mirage11–130.0818%3 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0715%2 Oct →
dust213–00.1210%2 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0624%2 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0517%2 Oct →
anubis13–80.0219%2 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0515%2 Oct →
nuke13–50.0421%2 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0120%2 Oct →
anubis6–130.0516%1 Oct →
dust213–100.0622%1 Oct →
ancient13–100.0113%1 Oct →
inferno13–100.0317%1 Oct →
dust213–70.0316%29 Sept →
mirage16–130.0011%29 Sept →
dust26–130.0320%28 Sept →
dust213–90.0029%28 Sept →
anubis13–90.0312%28 Sept →
anubis13–110.0216%27 Sept →
inferno16–140.0214%27 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0511%27 Sept →
ancient7–130.029%27 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0111%27 Sept →
mirage8–130.087%27 Sept →
dust21–130.0012%27 Sept →
inferno13–110.0222%27 Sept →
ancient13–60.1821%26 Sept →
anubis9–130.0219%26 Sept →
anubis13–60.0818%26 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.067%26 Sept →
dust210–60.0819%26 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0523%26 Sept →
mirage13–60.0720%26 Sept →
inferno13–90.1022%26 Sept →
mirage13–70.0510%26 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0521%25 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0615%25 Sept →
dust23–13-0.1017%25 Sept →
anubis2–130.0420%25 Sept →
dust214–160.0318%25 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0517%25 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0225%25 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0134%25 Sept →
mirage10–130.0315%25 Sept →
inferno9–130.0915%24 Sept →
mirage7–130.039%24 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.068%23 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0227%23 Sept →
mirage8–130.0120%23 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0618%21 Sept →
dust210–130.0720%20 Sept →
anubis13–50.0212%20 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0215%20 Sept →
mirage9–130.0632%20 Sept →
inferno8–130.0827%20 Sept →
anubis10–130.0018%20 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0621%20 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0222%20 Sept →
ancient13–50.0226%20 Sept →
dust27–130.0333%20 Sept →
inferno16–130.0323%19 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0219%19 Sept →
ancient8–130.0515%19 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0027%19 Sept →
inferno13–100.0224%19 Sept →
dust213–90.1023%19 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0319%19 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0321%19 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0218%19 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0525%19 Sept →
ancient13–80.0420%19 Sept →
dust213–60.0141%19 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.