pung pung pung sahur

pung pung pung sahur — CS2 Stats

76561199135100648[U:1:1174834920]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

473Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (43 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+2Tracked matches · now 473
0.0ppWin rate · 46.7% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,414 -430 13 Jun – 28 Aug · 12 days played
18,40419,926peak 19,92613 Jun28 Aug
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-06-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning46
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–51–3Last 10046%Win rateWLWWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility6.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch1.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.6
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time606ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 8 Jul →
49%Best headshot accuracy · 7–9 · vertigo, 18 Jun →
422msFastest reaction time · 19–16 · inferno, 31 Jul →
13–3Biggest win · mirage, 10 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 70% over 10infernoWeakest map · 20% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3216–1650%-0.00
ancientB2312–1152%-0.01
infernoD153–1220%-0.02
cacheS107–370%0.01
nukeA74–357%-0.02
overpassD62–433%-0.03
vertigo—32–167%0.02
anubis—20–20%-0.01
dust2—20–20%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

586Matches
52%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
78.9ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5254%1.0916.4
Ancient3853%0.9815.1
Vertigo3266%1.2416.8
Inferno2050%0.8713.0
Anubis1638%1.0114.8
Nuke1547%0.8012.4
Dust21346%1.0015.2
Cache771%1.0916.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.7%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
607msReaction time
28.9%T opening success
44.2%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
7.00HE damage / grenade
8.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.8803% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–11-0.0110%26 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.073%26 Sept →
cache13–70.0529%29 Aug →
mirage13–80.1026%29 Aug →
mirage10–130.0016%9 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0320%9 Aug →
inferno19–16-0.0316%31 Jul →
mirage11–130.0230%29 Jul →
mirage9–130.0018%29 Jul →
mirage13–70.0417%29 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0813%29 Jul →
cache5–130.0117%28 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0221%27 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0111%27 Jul →
mirage11–130.0425%27 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0520%27 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0416%27 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0317%27 Jul →
cache13–100.0314%26 Jul →
dust28–13-0.058%26 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0116%26 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0326%21 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0715%21 Jul →
inferno2–13-0.0212%21 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0115%21 Jul →
ancient13–100.0116%21 Jul →
mirage13–80.0226%21 Jul →
mirage13–100.0122%20 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0421%20 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0410%20 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0123%20 Jul →
cache13–110.0620%20 Jul →
ancient11–130.0129%20 Jul →
inferno8–130.0326%20 Jul →
ancient13–70.0818%12 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0018%12 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0116%11 Jul →
mirage12–16-0.0021%11 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0413%10 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0313%10 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0215%10 Jul →
mirage13–30.0324%10 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0233%10 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0318%10 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0212%10 Jul →
ancient13–90.0513%10 Jul →
mirage13–90.0227%10 Jul →
ancient13–50.0216%9 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0216%9 Jul →
cache13–80.0423%9 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0917%9 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0218%8 Jul →
mirage13–40.1225%8 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0133%8 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0521%8 Jul →
inferno11–130.0111%8 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0217%8 Jul →
ancient13–3-0.0018%6 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0117%6 Jul →
vertigo13–90.0027%6 Jul →
cache10–130.0227%6 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0121%6 Jul →
vertigo19–17-0.0020%4 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0612%4 Jul →
inferno15–15-0.016%4 Jul →
nuke16–140.0020%4 Jul →
mirage13–60.0422%25 Jun →
ancient13–80.0622%25 Jun →
nuke14–160.0115%25 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0515%25 Jun →
overpass13–70.0115%25 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0123%25 Jun →
ancient13–8-0.0217%25 Jun →
ancient13–16-0.0528%25 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.1320%23 Jun →
ancient13–16-0.0317%23 Jun →
overpass9–13-0.1024%23 Jun →
inferno4–130.0327%22 Jun →
nuke13–9-0.0530%22 Jun →
mirage13–50.0115%22 Jun →
mirage5–130.0428%22 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0433%21 Jun →
overpass13–9-0.0217%21 Jun →
ancient13–6-0.0213%21 Jun →
overpass11–130.0215%21 Jun →
inferno3–130.0125%21 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0515%21 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0915%20 Jun →
ancient13–90.0725%20 Jun →
overpass15–15-0.0324%18 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0319%18 Jun →
nuke16–13-0.0216%18 Jun →
mirage13–7-0.0336%18 Jun →
vertigo7–90.0749%18 Jun →
mirage13–100.0825%18 Jun →
overpass5–13-0.0513%18 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0829%15 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0512%15 Jun →
ancient15–15-0.0416%14 Jun →
ancient6–130.0423%13 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.