magic negro

magic negro — CS2 Stats

FI76561199122012545[U:1:1161746817]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

523Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,372Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,122 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 58 days played since 29 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 3,965 -7,852 23 Dec1 Jul · 8 days played
2,87611,817peak 11,81723 Dec1 Jul
11,817Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,122Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
58Days played since 2025-11-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,122
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 79 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate48.1%43.8%44.9%above
Shot accuracy10.7%12.0%12.4%1.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.971.021.040.07 short
Match win rate41.4%44.7%45.3%3.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmagic negroFACEITLevel 5 · 1,122 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,122csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning55
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46504Last 10046%Win rateLWLLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · −96ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 667ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility4.1
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.5
Utility4.1
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time642ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 642ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%+5.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–6 · nuke, 21 Dec
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · nuke, 8 Jun
422msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · overpass, 16 Dec
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 18 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
910In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 5dust2Weakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB45232251%0.00
mirageB178947%-0.02
dust2D102820%-0.02
vertigoD62433%-0.02
cacheA53260%0.04
overpassA53260%0.01
anubis41325%-0.03
inferno32167%0.01
ancient21150%-0.00
office1010%-0.10
alpine110100%-0.06
stronghold1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

42,888Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
2,920Matches
41.4%Match win rate
48.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
10.7%Shot accuracy
7,226MVPs
854Hours (in match)
1,218Bombs planted
379Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,199
AWP3,909
MP92,269
Knife828

Lifetime map wins

4,502nuke
2,463inferno
2,206vertigo
1,495dust2
754train
576cbble
183lake
138office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

415Matches
50%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
72.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15355%0.8613.7
Nuke8954%0.9914.4
Dust26237%0.8413.9
Train3161%0.8714.5
Anubis2236%0.8414.1
Ancient1963%0.8813.3
Inferno1833%0.6711.4
Overpass1060%0.9714.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
637msReaction time
47.5%T opening success
47.2%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
5.65HE damage / grenade
7.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0313%16 Sept
nuke13–2-0.0224%16 Sept
nuke1–13-0.0216%15 Sept
inferno10–130.0120%15 Sept
dust27–13-0.039%15 Sept
dust213–11-0.0122%30 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.0123%25 Aug
nuke13–60.0123%25 Aug
mirage13–7-0.1020%25 Aug
nuke9–30.0721%25 Aug
vertigo3–13-0.0216%6 Aug
inferno13–70.0324%4 Aug
mirage13–80.0124%4 Aug
dust28–13-0.1019%4 Aug
nuke5–13-0.064%29 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0727%29 Jul
cache13–20.0132%13 Jul
cache8–130.0518%13 Jul
office4–13-0.1012%12 Jul
overpass13–5-0.0124%1 Jul
vertigo10–13-0.0830%9 Jun
cache13–40.0322%9 Jun
nuke13–70.0937%8 Jun
overpass13–60.0420%21 May
mirage13–60.1024%21 May
anubis9–13-0.0420%20 May
cache13–60.0624%20 May
dust29–13-0.0315%20 May
nuke4–9-0.0712%18 May
inferno13–1-0.0131%18 May
cache10–130.0423%11 May
ancient12–12-0.0021%9 Apr
dust213–11-0.0124%8 Apr
nuke13–7-0.038%8 Apr
mirage6–13-0.134%8 Apr
vertigo8–13-0.0630%8 Apr
vertigo13–30.0420%8 Apr
mirage13–70.0126%8 Apr
mirage13–2-0.0320%7 Apr
alpine13–11-0.0615%6 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0512%31 Mar
stronghold6–13-0.0613%25 Mar
anubis1–13-0.1115%12 Mar
nuke4–90.0714%9 Mar
dust211–130.0520%8 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0220%28 Feb
mirage14–160.0718%25 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0117%24 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0415%24 Feb
overpass13–60.0423%24 Feb
nuke2–9-0.1713%23 Feb
nuke9–20.0116%23 Feb
dust26–13-0.0627%19 Feb
dust21–130.0235%17 Feb
mirage13–70.0515%17 Feb
ancient13–100.0025%15 Feb
mirage13–100.0215%12 Feb
nuke12–16-0.0416%8 Feb
nuke9–6-0.0914%3 Feb
nuke9–50.0121%3 Feb
nuke0–9-0.338%3 Feb
nuke13–40.0126%2 Feb
dust28–13-0.0317%31 Jan
nuke9–7-0.0222%29 Jan
dust211–130.0114%27 Jan
anubis4–13-0.0722%25 Jan
mirage9–13-0.058%22 Jan
overpass11–13-0.0316%20 Jan
nuke16–14-0.009%18 Jan
nuke4–13-0.103%15 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0021%14 Jan
nuke9–60.0719%7 Jan
nuke4–90.0221%29 Dec
nuke7–9-0.0811%29 Dec
nuke9–40.0718%29 Dec
nuke7–9-0.0017%28 Dec
nuke8–8-0.0030%28 Dec
nuke8–80.0711%28 Dec
nuke7–9-0.0317%28 Dec
nuke9–70.0223%28 Dec
mirage4–13-0.0228%24 Dec
nuke5–13-0.0410%23 Dec
nuke9–60.2019%21 Dec
vertigo7–90.0217%21 Dec
nuke6–9-0.0412%21 Dec
nuke4–9-0.1221%21 Dec
nuke9–50.116%21 Dec
nuke9–7-0.0210%21 Dec
nuke9–50.149%21 Dec
nuke9–30.1410%21 Dec
nuke9–70.0113%21 Dec
nuke4–90.1615%20 Dec
nuke9–10.1021%20 Dec
nuke8–80.149%20 Dec
nuke2–9-0.0817%19 Dec
nuke2–9-0.1023%18 Dec
overpass7–13-0.0126%16 Dec
mirage11–13-0.059%15 Dec
anubis13–40.1117%7 Dec
nuke13–110.0219%29 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →