Dxro

Dxro — CS2 Stats

76561199116708069[U:1:1156442341]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

423Tracked matches63%Win rate2022Tracked since
761Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning55
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56404Last 10056%Win rateWWWLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5
Aggression7.0
Utility3.2
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.5
Utility3.2
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time539ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 549ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy24.7%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 24.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — nuke 9–4
132Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
113In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 13infernoWeakest map · 47% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2315865%0.03
infernoB1991047%-0.00
ancientA1810856%0.03
dust2S139469%0.05
anubisA116555%0.02
cacheB105550%0.03
nuke31233%0.01
vertigo21150%0.01
overpass1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,890Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
1,829Matches
43.6%Match win rate
43.9%Headshot %
13.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
4,634MVPs
761Hours (in match)
1,001Bombs planted
318Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,345vertigo
1,332inferno
1,214dust2
531nuke
170train
143lake
68safehouse
48ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

101Matches
49%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
80.7ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3244%1.3517.5
Ancient2446%1.2415.5
Dust21747%1.0816.6
Anubis1560%1.3616.3
Inferno838%1.2416.3
Nuke3100%1.1619.0
Train10%0.578.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
82.9%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
542msReaction time
21.4%T opening success
57.7%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
4.31HE damage / grenade
6.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4378 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.441% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8–10.0267%15 Aug
anubis13–80.0224%8 Aug
ancient13–110.0223%7 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0027%5 Aug
inferno2–9-0.0720%5 Aug
anubis13–110.0224%3 Aug
ancient13–100.0413%31 Jul
mirage6–130.0629%29 Jul
inferno9–5-0.025%26 Jun
inferno5–9-0.167%26 Jun
nuke9–40.2030%26 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0615%17 Jun
dust213–40.0917%17 Jun
ancient7–130.0124%5 Jun
cache13–30.1827%31 May
dust213–70.0222%15 May
ancient13–40.0510%14 May
mirage13–6-0.0533%14 May
ancient6–13-0.0322%8 May
cache6–130.0430%3 May
cache9–13-0.0218%3 May
cache2–130.0142%2 May
cache8–13-0.0616%2 May
cache13–100.0826%2 May
cache13–50.0237%30 Apr
cache13–90.0331%30 Apr
cache4–130.0438%30 Apr
ancient13–110.0615%25 Apr
mirage13–90.0529%25 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0826%22 Apr
dust213–40.1728%17 Apr
mirage13–40.0814%17 Apr
dust213–90.0825%12 Apr
anubis13–90.0322%9 Apr
mirage9–130.0224%8 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0323%6 Apr
inferno8–130.0625%3 Apr
dust213–160.0325%3 Apr
dust216–140.0619%2 Apr
anubis3–130.0537%2 Apr
mirage8–130.0214%31 Mar
inferno9–60.0933%31 Mar
anubis11–130.0117%26 Mar
anubis13–40.0332%22 Mar
dust29–130.0327%21 Mar
mirage13–60.0423%21 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0323%20 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0018%20 Mar
mirage13–100.0524%20 Mar
inferno13–60.0919%20 Mar
mirage13–70.0131%15 Mar
mirage13–40.1338%15 Mar
dust213–20.1042%15 Mar
anubis13–5-0.0124%14 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0613%14 Mar
mirage13–90.0327%14 Mar
ancient13–60.0827%14 Mar
inferno13–80.0318%14 Mar
ancient13–70.0317%13 Mar
inferno15–150.0218%12 Mar
ancient11–130.0424%11 Mar
inferno13–60.0136%11 Mar
inferno9–5-0.0118%11 Mar
inferno8–80.0442%11 Mar
vertigo9–20.1030%11 Mar
nuke5–9-0.1117%11 Mar
mirage13–70.0618%7 Mar
inferno13–110.0115%7 Mar
mirage13–80.0427%7 Mar
ancient13–30.0510%7 Mar
nuke8–8-0.0535%7 Mar
inferno4–9-0.1014%7 Mar
vertigo8–8-0.0719%7 Mar
inferno9–70.0718%7 Mar
inferno3–9-0.0017%6 Mar
ancient13–90.0027%5 Mar
mirage6–130.0215%2 Mar
inferno3–130.0339%2 Mar
dust28–13-0.0327%1 Mar
dust213–6-0.0210%1 Mar
mirage25–230.0322%1 Mar
ancient9–130.0922%1 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0124%1 Mar
ancient13–30.0519%27 Feb
inferno2–13-0.0321%26 Feb
overpass7–13-0.0524%26 Feb
mirage13–60.0839%26 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0119%26 Feb
dust25–130.0326%26 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0519%21 Feb
dust213–20.0017%21 Feb
mirage13–110.0311%21 Feb
ancient13–110.0723%21 Feb
ancient7–130.0320%20 Feb
ancient6–130.0228%20 Feb
mirage13–30.1416%20 Feb
dust213–110.0616%18 Feb
anubis13–110.0627%17 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0122%16 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0121%15 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →