Skuffy — CS2 Stats

CK76561198946924374[U:1:986658646]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

586Tracked matches44%Win rate2021Tracked since

1,580Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating17,596Purple band · top ~18.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#28954 of 57917 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,587), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	50.9%	43.7%	44.7%	above
Shot accuracy	18.2%	11.8%	12.1%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.14	1.02	1.04	above
Match win rate	40.3%	45.0%	45.2%	4.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66

Positioning45

Utility19

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–50–5Last 10045%Win rateWLLLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6

Aggression6.4

Utility1.9

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch5.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 652ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6

Positioning4.5

Utility1.9

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact3.1

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time652ms−26ms

first ⅓ avg 678ms → last ⅓ avg 652ms

Headshot accuracy28.3%−1.4%

first ⅓ avg 29.7% → last ⅓ avg 28.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — cache 13–5

13–2Biggest win — mirage

4Longest win streak

3–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 53% over 15anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	27	11–16	41%	0.00
mirage	B	25	12–13	48%	0.00
cache	B	15	8–7	53%	-0.00
ancient	C	14	6–8	43%	0.01
inferno	B	11	5–6	45%	0.04
anubis	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.02
nuke	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

52,643Lifetime kills

1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players

2,707Matches

40.3%Match win rate

50.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players

18.2%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 5 players

5,985MVPs

769Hours (in match)

1,506Bombs planted

348Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,096

M4A4 / M4A1-S10,035

AWP4,238

Desert Eagle3,901

P2000 / USP-S3,637

Glock-182,275

Galil AR2,003

FAMAS1,030

MP7933

MP9806

Lifetime map wins

2,184vertigo

2,085dust2

2,032inferno

392nuke

358lake

233cbble

116train

62office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

101Matches

50%Win rate

1.18Avg K/D

94.4ADR

56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win

28%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	30	60%	1.19	18.9
Ancient	16	62%	1.32	18.8
Anubis	14	71%	1.34	19.4
Dust2	13	46%	1.25	20.9
Inferno	11	36%	1.22	16.8
Nuke	2	0%	1.40	20.0
Cache	2	50%	1.22	17.0
Train	1	0%	0.93	13.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.4%Headshot accuracy

30.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

30.0%Spray accuracy

82.2%Counter-strafing

10.1°Preaim

652msReaction time

41.2%T opening success

40.1%CT opening success

0.37Enemies flashed / flash

1.5%Flash assists

6.62HE damage / grenade

2.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3659 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–8	-0.03	19%	30 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.07	27%	30 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	43%	30 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.01	29%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.06	47%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	35%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.04	30%	31 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.01	29%	31 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.03	22%	29 Jul →
inferno	11–8	0.06	27%	21 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.03	12%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	37%	16 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.06	17%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.02	40%	16 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.03	18%	16 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	11%	16 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.10	30%	16 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.03	33%	16 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.02	36%	15 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	8%	15 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	6%	15 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.00	29%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.04	40%	14 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	32%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.00	45%	13 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.06	37%	13 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	34%	13 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.00	38%	11 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	21%	11 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.01	34%	9 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	22%	9 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	23%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	24%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.10	15%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.05	30%	8 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.03	24%	3 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.01	38%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	20%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.00	23%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.01	30%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.05	21%	29 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	30%	29 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.04	20%	27 Jun →
ancient	15–15	-0.05	20%	27 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	29%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.04	29%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.05	24%	26 Jun →
dust2	14–16	-0.07	23%	26 Jun →
inferno	9–5	0.17	18%	26 Jun →
inferno	5–9	0.05	23%	26 Jun →
nuke	9–4	-0.02	26%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.04	17%	25 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	26%	25 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	27%	25 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.06	22%	25 Jun →
cache	7–0	0.05	35%	25 Jun →
cache	1–3	-0.12	40%	25 Jun →
cache	13–8	-0.01	19%	23 Jun →
nuke	1–9	-0.14	18%	21 Jun →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	26%	21 Jun →
mirage	16–12	0.00	24%	21 Jun →
dust2	4–13	0.03	20%	21 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.12	19%	17 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.02	40%	17 Jun →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	21%	14 Jun →
anubis	2–13	-0.09	22%	14 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	42%	14 Jun →
dust2	16–13	0.06	24%	12 Jun →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	32%	7 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	17%	5 Jun →
inferno	11–3	0.09	67%	1 Jun →
dust2	7–13	0.06	29%	1 Jun →
ancient	7–13	0.01	41%	29 May →
mirage	16–12	-0.02	28%	29 May →
dust2	11–13	0.02	34%	17 May →
mirage	4–13	0.04	26%	16 May →
mirage	13–6	0.11	29%	14 May →
ancient	6–13	0.03	28%	8 May →
dust2	13–8	0.14	40%	6 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	26%	6 May →
cache	9–5	-0.03	45%	4 May →
cache	13–7	-0.02	32%	3 May →
ancient	13–10	0.11	24%	2 May →
cache	13–5	0.21	26%	2 May →
cache	5–13	-0.00	31%	2 May →
cache	7–13	-0.04	28%	2 May →
cache	2–13	-0.11	27%	2 May →
cache	8–13	0.05	32%	2 May →
cache	13–10	-0.02	47%	2 May →
mirage	13–3	0.00	43%	27 Apr →
dust2	11–13	0.08	38%	21 Apr →
dust2	13–2	0.06	35%	20 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	15%	20 Apr →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	20%	20 Apr →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	18%	17 Apr →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	19%	17 Apr →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	22%	12 Apr →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	13%	5 Apr →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	13%	3 Apr →
dust2	13–16	0.01	30%	3 Apr →