Edeka-Peek lohnt sich — CS2 Stats

DE76561198438246735[U:1:477981007]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

434Tracked matches64%Win rate2021Tracked since

1,679Hours in CS30Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#33938 of 56680 tracked

FaceitLevel 3 · 1,078 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,149), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 3 median	Level 4 median	vs Level 4
Headshot rate	39.1%	42.2%	42.7%	3.6% short
Shot accuracy	15.5%	11.9%	10.8%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.17	0.98	1.00	above
Match win rate	47.4%	43.6%	44.1%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61

Positioning40

Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–43–7Last 10050%Win rateLLWWWLTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1

Aggression0.5

Utility6.8

Positioning4.0

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1

Positioning4.0

Utility6.8

Mechanics4.0

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact9.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time549ms−63ms

first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms

Headshot accuracy11.8%−1.8%

first ⅓ avg 13.6% → last ⅓ avg 11.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — mirage 3–13

13–0Biggest win — dust2

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

16Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 58% over 12mirageWeakest map · 38% over 26

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	28	15–13	54%	-0.00
mirage	C	26	10–16	38%	-0.01
inferno	A	16	9–7	56%	0.00
ancient	A	12	7–5	58%	-0.01
anubis	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.01
cache	B	6	3–3	50%	0.01
nuke	—	3	2–1	67%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,248Lifetime kills

1.17K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players

1,953Matches

47.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players

39.1%Headshot %

15.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 3 players

3,797MVPs

658Hours (in match)

2,970Bombs planted

470Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-477,191

M4A4 / M4A1-S5,191

AWP2,719

P2000 / USP-S2,012

XM10141,748

Desert Eagle1,622

Galil AR1,529

Glock-181,521

SG 5531,194

P90884

Lifetime map wins

10,044dust2

1,635inferno

383nuke

155office

124vertigo

37safehouse

32train

28ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

80Matches

46%Win rate

0.97Avg K/D

69.7ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	33	64%	1.08	12.8
Dust2	17	29%	1.01	16.8
Ancient	13	46%	0.86	12.6
Anubis	9	33%	0.76	15.0
Inferno	6	33%	0.95	11.2
Nuke	1	0%	0.88	14.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.3%Headshot accuracy

37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.1%Spray accuracy

67.8%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

554msReaction time

16.0%T opening success

22.9%CT opening success

0.58Enemies flashed / flash

4.4%Flash assists

11.83HE damage / grenade

12.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.2531% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 15.9838% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	10–13	-0.01	10%	30 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.03	15%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.03	3%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.10	20%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.05	9%	28 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	16%	28 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.01	13%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.02	24%	27 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.01	10%	27 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.01	6%	27 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	4%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	5%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.05	11%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	7%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.04	16%	19 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.00	12%	19 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.00	22%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.03	6%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	14%	18 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	8%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.01	24%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.03	11%	17 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.10	18%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.07	3%	11 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	10%	11 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	14%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	8%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.01	11%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.02	10%	9 Aug →
anubis	29–31	-0.04	9%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	12%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	19%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.04	11%	31 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	8%	29 Jul →
anubis	16–13	-0.02	12%	24 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	12%	24 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	7%	23 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	12%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	7%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.08	9%	23 Jul →
nuke	9–5	0.06	3%	23 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.04	13%	22 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.05	16%	22 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.01	12%	22 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.04	10%	22 Jul →
anubis	15–15	-0.00	16%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.06	21%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.05	8%	22 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.09	7%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.06	11%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	13%	21 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.00	16%	17 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.11	0%	17 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	14%	17 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	5%	17 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.02	5%	17 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.03	18%	17 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	13%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.02	23%	9 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.08	7%	9 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	8%	9 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.05	11%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.06	15%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	11%	7 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	9%	28 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.01	6%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–6	-0.02	5%	27 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	9%	27 Jun →
ancient	15–15	-0.04	17%	27 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	8%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–6	-0.02	8%	26 Jun →
dust2	14–16	-0.01	7%	26 Jun →
mirage	16–12	0.02	16%	21 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	11%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	9%	20 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.00	14%	17 Jun →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	17%	17 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	22%	16 Jun →
mirage	13–3	-0.03	15%	16 Jun →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	11%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.05	14%	14 Jun →
anubis	2–13	-0.06	16%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.01	8%	13 Jun →
inferno	13–11	-0.07	3%	13 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.01	14%	13 Jun →
dust2	16–13	-0.01	7%	12 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.01	12%	11 Jun →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	8%	11 Jun →
mirage	12–16	-0.06	10%	21 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	18%	17 May →
mirage	13–6	0.04	21%	17 May →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	13%	16 May →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	23%	8 May →
mirage	7–13	0.04	12%	6 May →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	15%	6 May →
cache	6–13	-0.02	21%	3 May →
cache	9–13	-0.02	24%	3 May →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	20%	2 May →
cache	13–5	0.06	9%	2 May →
mirage	13–9	0.05	15%	25 Apr →