The assassin — CS2 Stats

76561199208147920[U:1:1247882192]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

781Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating17,679Purple band · top ~17.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#28715 of 57889 tracked

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning60

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–47–5Last 10048%Win rateLLWLLLWLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.1

Aggression8.4

Utility3.1

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels3.3

Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning6.0

Utility3.1

Mechanics5.0

Opening Duels3.3

Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time512ms−29ms

first ⅓ avg 541ms → last ⅓ avg 512ms

Headshot accuracy19.4%−0.7%

first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — mirage 13–0

13–0Biggest win — mirage

4Longest win streak

L2Current streak

12–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

16Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 10cacheWeakest map · 36% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
anubis	C	19	8–11	42%	-0.01
mirage	B	19	10–9	53%	0.02
ancient	B	17	9–8	53%	-0.01
dust2	B	17	8–9	47%	0.01
cache	C	11	4–7	36%	0.01
nuke	A	10	6–4	60%	0.02
inferno	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

206Matches

48%Win rate

1.20Avg K/D

85.5ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	71	51%	1.15	15.7
Ancient	45	42%	1.35	17.3
Dust2	32	47%	1.14	16.4
Anubis	31	55%	1.28	18.4
Inferno	14	43%	1.17	14.9
Cache	6	33%	1.01	15.8
Nuke	5	60%	0.76	11.6
Overpass	2	50%	1.07	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy

30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.6%Spray accuracy

72.5%Counter-strafing

7.1°Preaim

513msReaction time

33.9%T opening success

52.3%CT opening success

0.38Enemies flashed / flash

3.3%Flash assists

10.02HE damage / grenade

4.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.378 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.9077% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	11–13	-0.00	18%	30 Aug →
anubis	13–16	-0.00	22%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.03	7%	30 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.00	13%	9 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.05	9%	8 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.08	17%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	24%	8 Aug →
anubis	29–31	-0.05	21%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	9%	7 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.03	19%	5 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	9%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	22%	5 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.01	15%	5 Aug →
anubis	14–16	-0.03	25%	4 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.06	12%	4 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.04	17%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–3	-0.03	56%	4 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	17%	4 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.01	28%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	13%	3 Aug →
nuke	16–14	-0.07	13%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.03	22%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.08	20%	1 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.13	29%	31 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.08	28%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	11%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.11	17%	31 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	30%	31 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	19%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	19%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.02	35%	31 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.02	7%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.00	17%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.05	23%	26 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.05	23%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.07	8%	26 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	28%	26 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.08	26%	26 Jul →
nuke	16–12	0.03	23%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.02	26%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–1	0.05	4%	25 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.04	23%	25 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	13%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	22%	25 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.01	19%	24 Jul →
anubis	16–12	0.04	19%	24 Jul →
ancient	16–13	-0.04	4%	24 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	32%	24 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	20%	24 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.01	8%	18 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.03	15%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.05	9%	18 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	17%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.06	28%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.02	24%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.02	9%	18 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	40%	18 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.04	29%	18 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.05	25%	18 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	15%	18 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.00	23%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.07	23%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.02	17%	18 Jul →
dust2	10–4	0.01	26%	18 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	26%	16 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.00	19%	16 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.05	16%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.00	8%	16 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.07	17%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.05	36%	16 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.06	18%	16 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.06	14%	16 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.03	31%	16 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.03	25%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	19%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.04	40%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.02	16%	15 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.04	23%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.07	10%	15 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.03	22%	15 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.01	24%	15 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	16%	14 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	18%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.04	39%	14 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.05	16%	14 Jul →
cache	14–16	0.05	15%	14 Jul →
dust2	1–9	-0.03	10%	14 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.01	17%	14 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	20%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.06	19%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.09	27%	13 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	24%	13 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.02	13%	13 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.05	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	15%	11 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	26%	11 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.01	14%	11 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.02	18%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.18	15%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	22%	10 Jul →