Shepherd

Shepherd — CS2 Stats

CI76561199114816159[U:1:1154550431]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

268Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
344Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,205Top 50% of 215,248 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#68036 of 261485 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,585 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Oct 2026 (26 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 268 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,205 -2,241 5 Nov – 19 Oct · 20 days played
19,88323,446peak 23,4465 Nov19 Oct
23,869Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,669Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2025-03-18

Faceit ELO

  • 84 below peak (1,669)
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 166 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-10-19
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-10-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,241 below peak (23,446)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,795 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-10-19
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 19 Oct 2026 and 14 Nov 2026.

Measured 19 Oct 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate58.2%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy8.7%13.0%13.2%4.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.061.07meets
Match win rate44.8%46.3%46.9%2.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGShepherdFACEITLevel 8 · 1,585 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,205 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,669csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning55
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–47–3Last 10050%Win rateLWLLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.4pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility6.5
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.5
Utility6.5
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time656ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 656ms
Headshot accuracy29.5%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 26.1% → last ⅓ avg 29.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 26 Oct →
64%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · dust2, 26 Sept →
461msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · inferno, 26 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 8 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7trainWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3318–1555%0.00
dust2B2010–1050%0.02
infernoC167–944%-0.01
nukeC125–742%-0.01
overpassS75–271%-0.00
trainD51–420%-0.02
anubis—31–233%0.01
ancient—22–0100%0.01
agency—10–10%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

12,759Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
525Matches
44.8%Match win rate
58.2%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players
8.7%Shot accuracy
1,108MVPs
344Hours (in match)
363Bombs planted
176Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

585inferno
537dust2
502vertigo
500nuke
179train
12stmarc
11bank
11sugarcane

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

129Matches
58%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
62.8ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1644%0.9515.9
Inferno838%0.7814.9
Overpass786%0.9814.4
Nuke683%1.0419.0
Vertigo425%0.8915.0
Ancient450%0.8412.0
Anubis367%0.7812.7
Dust2250%0.8211.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.9%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.0%Spray accuracy
88.0%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
653msReaction time
32.4%T opening success
54.9%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
9.73HE damage / grenade
11.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.3668% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Train

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Train callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–160.0122%20 May →
nuke13–40.0244%20 May →
mirage5–130.0429%20 May →
dust28–13-0.0923%20 May →
mirage3–130.1133%19 May →
mirage13–70.0049%11 May →
nuke2–30.0420%11 May →
dust213–16-0.0318%11 May →
mirage13–4-0.0322%11 May →
dust216–140.0322%21 Apr →
dust213–90.0531%11 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0222%10 Apr →
mirage13–10.0317%10 Apr →
inferno9–130.0014%10 Apr →
mirage13–6-0.0035%3 Apr →
mirage3–13-0.0821%28 Mar →
nuke13–100.0137%28 Mar →
overpass13–11-0.0418%28 Mar →
dust213–110.1137%25 Mar →
mirage4–13-0.0326%25 Mar →
nuke15–150.0839%25 Mar →
mirage13–8-0.0342%24 Mar →
dust215–150.0846%24 Mar →
overpass9–13-0.0635%22 Mar →
mirage13–90.0622%22 Mar →
overpass13–40.0529%8 Mar →
dust213–00.1029%8 Mar →
dust22–13-0.0833%8 Mar →
mirage13–50.1149%1 Mar →
nuke3–10-0.0824%1 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0236%1 Mar →
inferno3–13-0.0617%1 Mar →
inferno13–90.0133%1 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0426%1 Jan →
dust213–10.0356%21 Dec →
nuke16–14-0.0435%20 Dec →
mirage13–110.0128%20 Dec →
inferno13–100.0231%12 Dec →
mirage13–16-0.0814%12 Dec →
inferno3–13-0.0626%11 Dec →
mirage13–10.1632%11 Dec →
nuke9–130.1233%5 Dec →
train13–10.1124%5 Dec →
inferno13–4-0.0143%5 Dec →
mirage10–13-0.1031%5 Dec →
mirage16–130.0218%4 Dec →
inferno6–13-0.0326%28 Nov →
mirage8–130.0818%27 Nov →
mirage13–100.0146%26 Nov →
overpass13–30.0629%24 Nov →
train9–13-0.0034%24 Nov →
dust23–13-0.0125%24 Nov →
mirage4–13-0.0713%23 Nov →
mirage1–8-0.0240%12 Nov →
nuke6–13-0.0416%12 Nov →
train10–13-0.0417%12 Nov →
dust213–100.0536%12 Nov →
dust213–00.0741%5 Nov →
mirage13–60.1025%5 Nov →
inferno10–13-0.0328%5 Nov →
inferno13–40.1132%5 Nov →
mirage13–50.0133%29 Oct →
dust210–130.0456%29 Oct →
overpass13–5-0.0514%29 Oct →
overpass8–13-0.0321%29 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0519%29 Oct →
inferno13–90.1032%26 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0131%26 Oct →
dust26–130.0628%26 Oct →
mirage13–70.1728%26 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0218%19 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0830%19 Oct →
inferno13–40.0121%19 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0530%7 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.1733%4 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0264%26 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0727%26 Sept →
overpass13–110.059%26 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0624%26 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0035%23 Sept →
inferno16–130.0721%22 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.080%15 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.1418%15 Jul →
nuke11–6-0.0631%11 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0311%11 Jul →
agency12–12-0.0127%3 Jul →
nuke13–1-0.0329%24 Jun →
anubis10–130.0128%24 Jun →
dust210–130.0338%24 Jun →
mirage13–100.0129%24 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0123%9 May →
mirage11–13-0.0512%22 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0116%21 Apr →
train1–13-0.0820%21 Apr →
train7–13-0.0729%28 Mar →
vertigo13–40.1143%23 Mar →
mirage7–130.0033%23 Mar →
anubis13–60.0430%23 Mar →
ancient13–40.0416%21 Mar →
dust213–100.0030%18 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.