♿Xops♿

♿Xops♿ — CS2 Stats

BW76561199113671073[U:1:1153405345]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,515Tracked matches75%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,940 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,940 → 1,940
+6Tracked matches · now 3,515
0.0ppWin rate · 75.0% → 75.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 65 days played since 4 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,878 -4,285 7 Apr29 Jun · 11 days played
12,87817,980peak 17,9807 Apr29 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,940 +0 6 Sept18 Sept · 4 observations
1,9401,940peak 1,9406 Sept18 Sept
17,980Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,940Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
65Days played since 2026-04-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,940
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 61 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG♿Xops♿FACEITLevel 7 · 1,940 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,940csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim39
Positioning36
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55414Last 10055%Win rateWWWWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · −72ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 91 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 20

  • 155 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim3.9
Utility6.6
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 63% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 59% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.9
Positioning3.6
Utility6.6
Mechanics2.0
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time630ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 630ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–7 · anubis, 3 Jun
58%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · nuke, 16 Jun
469msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · ancient, 24 May
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 12 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W4Current streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 100% over 5mirageWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS36241267%-0.01
ancientC167944%-0.03
mirageC146843%-0.03
anubisC94544%-0.04
nukeS75271%-0.02
vertigoS550100%-0.02
train42250%-0.00
cache41325%-0.03
overpass3030%-0.05
dust2110100%0.04
office1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,854Matches
50%Win rate
0.79Avg K/D
72.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno70261%0.8313.7
Ancient56251%0.7613.6
Mirage32842%0.7312.8
Anubis23145%0.7512.9
Overpass14950%0.7813.3
Nuke10943%0.8014.0
Dust29631%0.7012.1
Train8443%0.7613.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
59.0%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
629msReaction time
23.8%T opening success
42.4%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
10.74HE damage / grenade
7.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.766% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–3-0.0226%14 Sept
inferno13–8-0.066%5 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0517%5 Sept
inferno8–20.0513%25 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0312%25 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0523%25 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0212%18 Aug
train13–9-0.0017%15 Aug
train13–7-0.0216%14 Aug
vertigo13–80.0021%29 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0915%26 Jul
inferno16–12-0.0317%26 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0217%23 Jul
inferno10–130.0018%22 Jul
vertigo13–5-0.0526%17 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0012%15 Jul
dust213–10.0416%12 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0619%11 Jul
mirage6–13-0.1023%10 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0421%10 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0113%10 Jul
cache6–13-0.0514%10 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0413%10 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0112%9 Jul
mirage13–80.0224%9 Jul
ancient17–19-0.0610%8 Jul
cache12–12-0.0324%8 Jul
office12–12-0.0510%8 Jul
nuke13–11-0.048%1 Jul
inferno13–80.037%1 Jul
cache13–30.0515%1 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0120%29 Jun
nuke10–130.0014%29 Jun
cache5–13-0.078%29 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0214%29 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0917%27 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0214%26 Jun
vertigo13–11-0.0119%24 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0426%24 Jun
nuke16–130.0210%21 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0231%20 Jun
train10–13-0.0017%19 Jun
train12–120.0127%19 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0858%16 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0645%15 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0429%14 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0112%12 Jun
inferno13–60.0014%12 Jun
mirage13–3-0.078%8 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0313%7 Jun
inferno13–30.0628%6 Jun
vertigo13–90.0111%4 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0111%4 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0421%3 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0316%3 Jun
anubis13–70.0827%3 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0111%2 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0415%27 May
ancient9–13-0.0916%24 May
mirage13–7-0.0513%22 May
nuke13–80.0024%19 May
vertigo13–11-0.0329%19 May
inferno3–13-0.0114%18 May
mirage11–13-0.058%17 May
mirage11–13-0.0016%16 May
ancient10–13-0.0216%16 May
ancient13–1-0.0720%13 May
inferno9–13-0.0623%12 May
mirage13–90.0317%7 May
overpass7–13-0.0815%6 May
ancient5–13-0.0613%5 May
mirage13–16-0.0316%5 May
mirage6–130.0114%3 May
mirage13–7-0.0216%2 May
anubis5–13-0.067%2 May
inferno16–140.0213%1 May
inferno13–8-0.0111%30 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0422%30 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0515%27 Apr
anubis13–10-0.1022%24 Apr
ancient9–130.0110%20 Apr
inferno13–20.0319%18 Apr
inferno16–13-0.0315%18 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0121%18 Apr
ancient13–5-0.0214%18 Apr
ancient15–15-0.0419%16 Apr
ancient13–8-0.038%16 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0723%16 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0414%14 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0018%12 Apr
anubis3–13-0.096%11 Apr
ancient13–60.0717%10 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0318%10 Apr
mirage19–150.0313%10 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0321%8 Apr
inferno2–5-0.0429%7 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0217%6 Apr
anubis4–13-0.057%6 Apr
inferno13–110.0419%5 Apr
inferno9–130.0114%4 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →