di_lan — CS2 Stats

76561199104888675[U:1:1144622947]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

519Tracked matches48%Win rate2025Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.4 Developing

Premier CS Rating19,072Purple band · top ~12.2% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51

Positioning47

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–44–5Last 10051%Win rateWWWLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.1

Aggression5.1

Utility4.9

Positioning4.7

Opening Duels1.4

Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1

Positioning4.7

Utility4.9

Mechanics4.2

Opening Duels1.4

Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time599ms−35ms

first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms

Headshot accuracy15.5%+3.2%

first ⅓ avg 12.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — dust2 13–4

13–1Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

W3Current streak

14–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 14nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	32	16–16	50%	-0.01
dust2	A	20	12–8	60%	-0.01
ancient	A	14	9–5	64%	-0.01
inferno	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.03
cache	A	8	5–3	63%	-0.03
anubis	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.01
nuke	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.03
poseidon	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.14
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
office	—	1	1–0	100%	0.00
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

26Matches

42%Win rate

0.95Avg K/D

77.0ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

14%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	9	56%	1.00	15.7
Dust2	7	43%	1.01	14.0
Ancient	4	25%	0.70	10.8
Inferno	3	0%	1.04	17.3
Cache	2	100%	1.06	14.0
Nuke	1	0%	0.50	8.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy

35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.3%Spray accuracy

68.8%Counter-strafing

11.6°Preaim

608msReaction time

34.2%T opening success

37.3%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

5.1%Flash assists

8.15HE damage / grenade

9.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4926 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.2264% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–7	-0.00	15%	28 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.00	13%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.07	24%	28 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	9%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	15%	27 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	21%	27 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	26%	27 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	5%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–3	-0.05	12%	23 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.05	14%	23 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	9%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.01	7%	22 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	35%	22 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.04	28%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.18	13%	22 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.05	17%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.08	14%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.02	17%	20 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	13%	19 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	21%	19 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.06	19%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.02	16%	18 Aug →
poseidon	9–5	-0.14	0%	18 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.07	4%	18 Aug →
nuke	4–9	-0.13	9%	16 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	8%	15 Aug →
inferno	8–8	-0.16	11%	15 Aug →
overpass	7–13	-0.02	27%	15 Aug →
italy	6–13	-0.05	26%	13 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	12%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	11%	13 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	14%	13 Aug →
mirage	2–0	0.00	25%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.00	24%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.05	17%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	17%	13 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	16%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.08	15%	12 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	11%	12 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.05	18%	12 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.03	21%	11 Aug →
office	13–5	0.00	12%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.00	7%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	10%	9 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.01	13%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	9%	8 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.09	10%	8 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	10%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	15%	8 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	9%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.14	18%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	14%	5 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	11%	5 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	7%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	29%	1 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	6%	1 Aug →
poseidon	8–8	-0.14	18%	1 Aug →
debris	8–8	-0.08	15%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	25%	30 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	14%	30 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.03	19%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	6%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.07	23%	29 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	17%	29 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	27%	28 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	10%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	7%	27 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.01	18%	26 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.06	11%	26 Jul →
mirage	16–14	-0.06	15%	26 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.06	5%	25 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.02	13%	25 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	11%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.06	2%	25 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.06	9%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–2	-0.04	14%	25 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	8%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	13%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	23%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.06	12%	24 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	14%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.02	13%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	13%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.08	20%	23 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.05	16%	23 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.04	11%	23 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	13%	23 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	13%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	14%	22 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	4%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	17%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–16	0.00	8%	22 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.03	9%	22 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.07	12%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	10%	22 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.07	4%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	29%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.09	10%	21 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.08	12%	21 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	11%	21 Jul →