SemenSlayer

SemenSlayer — CS2 Stats

76561199096601384[U:1:1136335656]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

683Tracked matches38%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3 · 447 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (21 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 447 → 447
+3Tracked matches · now 683
0.0ppWin rate · 37.9% → 37.9%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 60 days played since 6 Aug 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

447Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
60Days played since 2025-08-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 447
  • Next: Level 2 at 501 54 to go

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSemenSlayerFACEITLevel 3 · 447 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPEAK ELO447csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning38
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD34633Last 10034%Win rateWLLTLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −7.3pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 717ms

Last 10

  • 181 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 681ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 678ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility2.9
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch3.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 683ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning3.8
Utility2.9
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time696ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 720ms → last ⅓ avg 696ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 23 Jan
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · anubis, 7 Jun
500msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 3 May
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 24 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
29In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 41% over 22ancientWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C28101836%-0.03
mirageC2291341%-0.02
infernoC2281436%-0.02
nukeD103730%-0.02
ancientD81713%-0.01
overpassD62433%-0.01
anubis21150%0.01
cache1010%-0.07
train1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

500Matches
49%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
73.5ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust215148%0.9714.7
Mirage14152%0.9514.5
Inferno7549%0.8513.6
Nuke5246%0.8813.9
Ancient2326%0.7813.2
Anubis2148%0.9915.1
Overpass1656%0.8913.7
Cache1258%0.9614.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
683msReaction time
27.6%T opening success
34.0%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
10.24HE damage / grenade
3.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4231 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.5812% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–7-0.016%28 Aug
cache10–13-0.077%28 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0621%13 Aug
nuke15–150.0512%17 Jul
dust29–13-0.0419%15 Jul
dust25–13-0.0322%1 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0139%1 Jul
dust27–13-0.0530%29 Jun
inferno15–19-0.0621%23 Jun
ancient11–130.0521%8 Jun
dust29–13-0.0639%8 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0628%7 Jun
anubis13–100.0453%7 Jun
dust213–10-0.0312%2 Jun
dust29–13-0.0913%29 May
inferno13–20.0339%24 May
dust27–13-0.0619%23 May
overpass6–13-0.0827%12 May
nuke13–6-0.0220%12 May
ancient6–130.0120%11 May
ancient13–11-0.0110%7 May
ancient9–13-0.0515%5 May
inferno13–60.0140%3 May
dust28–13-0.055%2 May
nuke4–13-0.0719%28 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0312%21 Apr
dust24–13-0.099%14 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0214%11 Apr
dust213–4-0.039%8 Apr
inferno13–90.0216%2 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0912%31 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0911%19 Mar
dust213–50.0420%12 Mar
dust213–9-0.0113%11 Mar
mirage13–70.0610%7 Mar
overpass13–60.049%6 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0512%24 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0015%23 Feb
ancient6–13-0.059%23 Feb
nuke13–7-0.0122%23 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0727%23 Feb
dust28–13-0.0517%20 Feb
inferno12–16-0.0110%18 Feb
dust214–16-0.0220%18 Feb
dust212–16-0.0516%17 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0519%17 Feb
inferno10–130.0232%16 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0314%15 Feb
dust28–130.0018%15 Feb
overpass14–16-0.0320%15 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0431%15 Feb
overpass13–60.0516%15 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0523%15 Feb
inferno13–4-0.0233%14 Feb
mirage13–70.0133%14 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0112%12 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0015%12 Feb
dust213–7-0.057%10 Feb
dust213–70.0320%4 Feb
dust22–13-0.040%3 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0611%3 Feb
nuke8–13-0.057%31 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0416%30 Jan
inferno3–13-0.094%27 Jan
inferno13–50.0513%23 Jan
mirage13–60.0311%23 Jan
dust213–30.1211%23 Jan
mirage11–13-0.066%23 Jan
dust27–13-0.0729%21 Jan
mirage13–110.0220%15 Jan
mirage6–13-0.087%15 Dec
mirage20–22-0.0110%15 Oct
dust211–13-0.0216%15 Oct
dust213–90.0124%9 Sept
train5–13-0.0617%20 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0914%20 Aug
dust23–13-0.0715%20 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0419%15 Aug
nuke3–9-0.1421%15 Aug
dust29–13-0.0121%15 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0021%14 Aug
overpass11–13-0.036%14 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0218%14 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0416%14 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0032%14 Aug
inferno9–60.0325%13 Aug
inferno17–19-0.0221%13 Aug
dust213–60.0834%13 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0122%13 Aug
nuke13–30.0629%13 Aug
dust24–13-0.088%11 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0112%11 Aug
ancient6–13-0.069%11 Aug
ancient4–130.0619%11 Aug
inferno13–70.036%11 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0310%9 Aug
inferno12–160.0611%7 Aug
inferno10–130.0223%7 Aug
overpass5–13-0.0527%7 Aug
dust213–6-0.0416%6 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →