Narmis

Narmis — CS2 Stats

CA76561198121064584[U:1:160798856]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

439Tracked matches37%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingSupport
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 71 days played since 17 Apr 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,252 -166 17 Apr14 Jun · 9 days played
7,1167,872peak 7,87217 Apr14 Jun
7,872Peak Premier in tracked matches
809Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
71Days played since 2024-04-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 809
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 92 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNarmisPEAK ELO809csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning32
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42535Last 10042%Win rateWLWLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −93ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 691ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility4.4
Positioning3.2
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 695ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning3.2
Utility4.4
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact0.7

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time707ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 709ms → last ⅓ avg 707ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 31 May
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 1 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · mirage, 3 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 14 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 10ancientWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD35122334%0.01
dust2B29141548%0.01
nukeC125742%0.01
infernoS108280%0.03
cacheC52340%-0.02
ancientD5050%0.03
vertigo21150%0.03
anubis1010%-0.08
overpass1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

253Matches
47%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
89.1ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7634%1.1217.1
Dust27358%1.2317.4
Nuke3361%1.1617.2
Inferno3256%1.3618.5
Ancient1331%1.0415.2
Anubis1136%0.9615.9
Cache729%1.1419.7
Overpass633%0.9014.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
85.0%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
695msReaction time
33.8%T opening success
28.1%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
14.17HE damage / grenade
5.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.8239% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–7-0.0417%19 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0132%16 Sept
dust213–7-0.0112%3 Sept
mirage3–130.0312%3 Sept
cache6–13-0.0017%3 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0814%24 Aug
dust213–40.0938%24 Aug
mirage10–130.0112%24 Aug
dust24–13-0.117%23 Aug
dust213–4-0.0421%23 Aug
cache13–8-0.0019%21 Aug
dust23–13-0.078%2 Aug
dust212–12-0.0030%2 Aug
dust213–50.0639%1 Aug
dust25–13-0.0115%10 Jul
dust210–13-0.0118%7 Jul
cache9–13-0.0114%22 Jun
cache0–13-0.0818%22 Jun
cache13–70.0111%16 Jun
dust26–13-0.0226%11 Jun
nuke13–80.0521%11 Jun
dust212–12-0.0429%9 Jun
dust25–13-0.078%2 Jun
dust212–12-0.0422%29 May
nuke13–11-0.0321%25 May
inferno13–20.0622%24 May
mirage8–130.0120%23 May
mirage8–130.0019%12 May
ancient6–130.0214%11 May
mirage11–13-0.0114%5 May
mirage12–16-0.0129%3 May
nuke4–13-0.054%28 Apr
dust213–70.0913%15 Apr
dust24–130.0424%14 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0716%11 Apr
inferno13–100.0217%10 Apr
nuke10–130.0320%9 Apr
dust213–60.0623%1 Apr
mirage4–130.0319%21 Mar
dust216–140.0417%12 Mar
mirage13–2-0.0111%10 Mar
dust213–40.0927%6 Mar
mirage9–130.0712%26 Feb
mirage10–130.0018%26 Feb
mirage9–130.0025%24 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0422%23 Feb
nuke13–70.0810%23 Feb
inferno8–130.0315%23 Feb
mirage6–130.0010%22 Feb
nuke13–100.1017%22 Feb
dust27–13-0.0415%22 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0219%21 Feb
inferno13–90.0713%21 Feb
nuke4–13-0.028%13 Feb
mirage2–130.0513%13 Feb
inferno13–70.0620%13 Feb
nuke9–130.0215%12 Feb
inferno13–100.0920%11 Feb
mirage11–130.0619%8 Feb
dust213–9-0.0519%7 Feb
ancient6–13-0.039%4 Feb
dust211–130.0223%25 Jan
ancient5–130.1120%25 Jan
mirage11–130.0112%23 Jan
ancient7–130.0721%18 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0023%18 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0512%15 Jan
inferno13–60.0425%6 Jan
mirage15–150.0623%14 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0019%12 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0317%23 May
nuke16–120.0715%6 May
mirage13–70.067%28 Apr
inferno13–80.0114%18 Dec
dust210–13-0.0519%18 Nov
mirage13–70.0316%18 Nov
vertigo1–130.0011%18 Nov
inferno10–130.008%17 Nov
mirage13–90.0110%17 Nov
dust213–100.0911%16 Nov
dust213–10.0019%14 Sept
dust26–130.008%14 Sept
vertigo13–100.0718%3 Sept
mirage13–100.0129%20 Aug
dust29–130.0421%14 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0520%8 Jun
dust213–80.0117%8 Jun
dust213–40.1724%31 May
mirage13–5-0.0116%31 May
mirage11–130.0933%31 May
inferno13–9-0.0522%31 May
dust213–90.058%4 May
nuke15–15-0.0227%4 May
nuke9–13-0.0438%3 May
mirage13–110.0716%22 Apr
overpass8–130.0410%21 Apr
mirage10–130.0915%21 Apr
mirage13–100.1117%20 Apr
mirage13–50.0123%20 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0519%17 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →