Mantipanti

Mantipanti — CS2 Stats

NO76561199083693844[U:1:1123428116]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,013Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,090 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,090 → 2,090
+1Tracked matches · now 5,013
−1.7ppWin rate · 51.7% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 11 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,571 -10 11 Jun3 Sept · 14 days played
20,16820,948peak 20,94811 Jun3 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,090 +0 30 Aug17 Sept · 3 observations
2,0902,090peak 2,09030 Aug17 Sept
21,228Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,090Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-06-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,090
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 410 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMantipantiFACEITLevel 9 · 2,090 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,090csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning66
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48457Last 10048%Win rateLLWLLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −5.3pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility6.1
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.6
Utility6.1
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time559ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–8 · cache, 28 Jun
42%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · dust2, 22 Jun
414msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 11 Jun
13–0Biggest win · cache, 28 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
1113In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7ancientWeakest map · 24% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2191243%-0.00
ancientD2151624%0.01
dust2C167944%0.01
cacheA1610663%0.00
infernoB105550%0.00
anubisS76186%0.03
mirageS54180%0.01
vertigo21150%0.01
overpass21150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

987Matches
52%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
80.8ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient16851%1.1216.9
Dust216550%1.1816.6
Inferno13857%1.2217.3
Mirage12855%1.2016.7
Anubis12048%1.1716.6
Nuke9451%1.3116.8
Cache3951%1.1314.8
Overpass2857%1.0914.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
89.3%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
550msReaction time
37.4%T opening success
53.6%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
9.54HE damage / grenade
14.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.3671% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–13-0.1018%18 Sept
nuke9–130.0625%12 Sept
nuke16–140.0419%12 Sept
dust211–13-0.0128%11 Sept
nuke2–13-0.078%11 Sept
cache11–13-0.0919%9 Sept
dust214–160.0624%6 Sept
cache11–130.0232%6 Sept
nuke2–13-0.048%6 Sept
anubis13–11-0.039%5 Sept
dust213–60.0815%4 Sept
dust213–50.0338%2 Sept
cache11–13-0.0521%2 Sept
ancient13–60.1031%31 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0525%12 Aug
dust211–13-0.0219%11 Aug
ancient13–30.0529%11 Aug
nuke10–130.0122%11 Aug
ancient9–130.0023%10 Aug
ancient22–25-0.0122%9 Aug
anubis13–60.0635%9 Aug
nuke13–110.0323%7 Aug
anubis13–100.0528%6 Aug
mirage13–110.0016%6 Aug
inferno13–100.0119%6 Aug
vertigo13–10.0718%5 Aug
inferno16–140.0120%5 Aug
dust213–80.0527%4 Aug
cache13–6-0.0126%4 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0712%4 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0133%4 Aug
cache11–13-0.0229%4 Aug
cache13–50.0229%3 Aug
dust213–11-0.0115%2 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0314%2 Aug
ancient13–50.0610%2 Aug
cache11–130.0215%1 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0238%1 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0217%1 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0519%29 Jul
cache2–13-0.0629%29 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0122%28 Jul
cache13–00.0530%28 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0124%28 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0627%27 Jul
dust215–150.0329%27 Jul
anubis13–90.0518%27 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0211%27 Jul
cache5–30.0125%27 Jul
dust211–13-0.0219%26 Jul
ancient15–150.0615%24 Jul
ancient4–130.0327%19 Jul
inferno8–130.0222%19 Jul
dust213–80.0931%16 Jul
overpass13–90.0220%16 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0124%16 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0520%16 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0632%14 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0410%14 Jul
cache13–20.0433%14 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0117%14 Jul
mirage13–90.0125%3 Jul
nuke9–130.0241%3 Jul
inferno13–80.0223%3 Jul
dust213–90.0115%3 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0129%3 Jul
nuke13–20.0427%2 Jul
dust213–6-0.0123%1 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0217%29 Jun
cache13–60.0031%29 Jun
ancient11–130.0231%28 Jun
dust29–13-0.0023%28 Jun
cache13–7-0.0319%28 Jun
nuke7–130.0829%28 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0326%28 Jun
cache13–80.1220%28 Jun
nuke13–80.0435%27 Jun
anubis13–50.0929%27 Jun
ancient9–130.0418%27 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0116%23 Jun
mirage10–130.0327%22 Jun
dust28–130.0242%22 Jun
dust215–15-0.0428%21 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0212%20 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0318%20 Jun
inferno13–70.0326%18 Jun
cache13–20.0617%17 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0115%17 Jun
ancient13–110.1022%16 Jun
nuke13–40.0419%15 Jun
anubis6–130.0430%14 Jun
nuke1–13-0.0725%13 Jun
inferno13–60.0939%13 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0125%13 Jun
nuke13–110.0533%13 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0323%12 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0023%12 Jun
mirage13–40.0328%12 Jun
cache13–5-0.0111%12 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0513%11 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →