DinkenZ1 — CS2 Stats

76561199060848095[U:1:1100582367]✓ No bans

929Tracked matches48%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,220Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.9% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,651 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning43

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateLLWWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9

Aggression6.2

Utility5.9

Positioning4.3

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning4.3

Utility5.9

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time585ms−9ms

first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms

Headshot accuracy20.2%+1.0%

first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — overpass 13–4

13–2Biggest win — anubis

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 68% over 22dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	22	15–7	68%	0.02
anubis	C	18	8–10	44%	-0.02
cache	S	12	8–4	67%	0.01
vertigo	A	12	7–5	58%	0.03
inferno	A	10	6–4	60%	-0.00
dust2	D	8	2–6	25%	0.01
overpass	A	8	5–3	63%	0.02
ancient	C	5	2–3	40%	0.02
nuke	—	4	1–3	25%	0.01
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

347Matches

54%Win rate

1.13Avg K/D

84.8ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	92	59%	1.17	17.1
Inferno	36	56%	1.09	16.0
Anubis	36	47%	1.15	16.2
Vertigo	21	43%	0.99	16.5
Dust2	17	59%	1.15	17.2
Ancient	17	29%	0.85	13.6
Overpass	15	60%	1.09	17.4
Nuke	8	50%	1.12	15.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy

36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.8%Spray accuracy

78.8%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

572msReaction time

32.7%T opening success

47.1%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

4.5%Flash assists

10.01HE damage / grenade

14.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.7087% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	8–13	-0.03	18%	21 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.04	21%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.05	9%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.06	21%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	33%	15 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.06	18%	15 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	17%	14 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.04	35%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.13	20%	14 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.01	15%	12 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	19%	10 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	15%	9 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.04	21%	4 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	15%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.04	24%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	13%	2 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.00	17%	1 Aug →
mirage	5–0	-0.07	40%	1 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.04	21%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.06	21%	1 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.03	27%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	30%	31 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	12%	31 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.02	27%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.04	13%	31 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.07	17%	31 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.06	17%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.06	29%	19 Jul →
dust2	12–16	-0.02	20%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	7%	18 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.02	24%	17 Jul →
overpass	13–9	-0.05	11%	15 Jul →
vertigo	13–11	0.05	16%	15 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	10%	15 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.04	18%	15 Jul →
inferno	16–13	0.03	17%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	15%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–2	-0.01	26%	14 Jul →
vertigo	13–5	0.00	29%	14 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.08	18%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.00	26%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.03	9%	13 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	22%	13 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.02	8%	13 Jul →
overpass	13–4	0.19	9%	11 Jul →
inferno	10–3	0.05	36%	11 Jul →
vertigo	10–13	0.04	15%	11 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	18%	11 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	16%	11 Jul →
mirage	12–16	0.09	16%	11 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.03	7%	11 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	-0.01	8%	11 Jul →
overpass	6–13	-0.02	18%	10 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	11%	10 Jul →
overpass	13–11	0.04	23%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	8%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.00	11%	9 Jul →
vertigo	13–4	0.09	18%	9 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.01	17%	8 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	3%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.02	27%	8 Jul →
overpass	13–8	0.10	19%	7 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.09	30%	7 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	13%	7 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	8%	6 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	11%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	21%	5 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.07	39%	5 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	23%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.10	13%	5 Jul →
vertigo	7–13	-0.02	17%	4 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.04	22%	4 Jul →
overpass	5–13	-0.07	20%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.04	21%	4 Jul →
mirage	25–21	0.02	15%	4 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	0.01	14%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.01	12%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.02	19%	4 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.01	22%	3 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	12%	3 Jul →
overpass	10–13	-0.02	16%	3 Jul →
vertigo	10–13	0.05	23%	3 Jul →
train	13–8	0.02	21%	30 Jun →
vertigo	11–13	0.07	19%	30 Jun →
anubis	16–13	-0.03	13%	30 Jun →
anubis	16–13	-0.01	15%	28 Jun →
overpass	13–10	-0.02	24%	28 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.01	25%	27 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	15%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.03	25%	26 Jun →
nuke	13–5	0.08	19%	26 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.04	26%	26 Jun →
vertigo	13–11	0.05	20%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.09	24%	24 Jun →
dust2	5–13	0.01	10%	24 Jun →
vertigo	13–7	0.02	17%	24 Jun →
anubis	14–16	-0.05	19%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	25%	24 Jun →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	19%	23 Jun →
vertigo	5–13	0.04	12%	23 Jun →