intentwig285

intentwig285 — CS2 Stats

76561199047414329[U:1:1087148601]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

77Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
76Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.2 LearningPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (22 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+6Tracked matches · now 77
−16.2ppWin rate · 64.0% → 47.8%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 27 Feb 2023. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

32Days played since 2023-02-27

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim26
Positioning47
Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD412610Last 7753%Win rateTTLTLLWWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 023 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 334 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Last 20

  • 866 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 660ms

Newest first, from the last 77 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim2.6
Utility2.2
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.6
Positioning4.7
Utility2.2
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact4.3

Composite 3.2/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time644ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 684ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms
Headshot accuracy14.7%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 77 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–1 · anubis, 3 Apr
30%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · cache, 30 Apr
484msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · nuke, 18 May
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 20 Apr

Across the last 77 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
51In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9ancientWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB1991047%-0.02
mirageB179853%-0.04
ancientC104640%-0.03
infernoA106460%-0.02
anubisS96367%-0.01
cacheS64267%-0.00
overpass31233%-0.03
office21150%-0.07
dust2110100%-0.06

Across the last 77 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

1,946Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
161Matches
47.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
38.5%Headshot %
8.8%Shot accuracy
178MVPs
50Hours (in match)
122Bombs planted
50Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

236nuke
130inferno
48office
24cbble
24militia
23dust2
12vertigo
9italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
29.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.4%Spray accuracy
66.3%Counter-strafing
12.8°Preaim
644msReaction time
18.0%T opening success
40.6%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
6.18HE damage / grenade
0.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.7607° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.383% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4075 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient12–12-0.0121%8 Sept
nuke12–12-0.056%8 Sept
inferno8–13-0.1017%4 Sept
nuke12–12-0.0516%4 Sept
cache7–13-0.0320%2 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0120%2 Sept
nuke13–80.0015%25 Aug
cache13–7-0.0310%26 Jun
nuke13–40.0111%25 Jun
ancient12–120.0417%25 Jun
mirage7–13-0.047%25 Jun
nuke13–70.0813%12 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0426%12 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0112%11 Jun
ancient1–13-0.0825%11 Jun
nuke12–120.0318%11 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0812%11 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0511%4 Jun
overpass13–40.0321%1 Jun
mirage13–7-0.043%1 Jun
cache13–110.0315%1 Jun
mirage10–13-0.089%18 May
cache10–13-0.029%18 May
nuke13–30.0314%18 May
nuke10–130.0021%18 May
nuke12–12-0.0015%18 May
cache13–40.0021%15 May
nuke8–13-0.069%15 May
inferno9–130.0219%15 May
mirage6–13-0.100%30 Apr
cache13–100.0330%30 Apr
nuke13–6-0.014%30 Apr
nuke12–12-0.0611%20 Apr
mirage13–00.0713%20 Apr
mirage13–6-0.024%3 Apr
ancient13–0-0.019%3 Apr
anubis13–10.1318%3 Apr
overpass12–12-0.0610%2 Apr
mirage7–13-0.088%2 Apr
anubis7–13-0.106%2 Apr
nuke13–3-0.0610%2 Apr
anubis11–13-0.034%1 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0115%1 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0215%1 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0619%30 Mar
inferno13–110.008%30 Mar
office13–60.008%29 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0713%29 Mar
anubis13–20.0618%24 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0715%24 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0123%24 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0419%23 Mar
mirage13–20.0314%23 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0013%23 Mar
anubis13–70.0015%20 Mar
mirage5–5-0.045%20 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0217%20 Mar
inferno13–7-0.0411%10 Mar
nuke13–80.017%10 Mar
dust213–3-0.0611%10 Mar
mirage5–13-0.1724%10 Mar
inferno13–2-0.0023%8 Mar
anubis13–3-0.0317%5 Mar
ancient13–4-0.0116%5 Mar
inferno13–7-0.019%5 Mar
mirage13–50.0816%5 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0126%24 Feb
anubis13–2-0.039%12 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0712%12 Feb
nuke8–13-0.059%12 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0510%3 Feb
mirage13–20.0120%3 Feb
nuke2–13-0.1213%16 Jan
mirage5–13-0.1113%10 Dec
overpass12–12-0.066%22 Nov
inferno8–13-0.0717%22 Nov
office5–16-0.140%27 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →