choaking guy

choaking guy — CS2 Stats

GB76561199046228120[U:1:1085962392]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,318Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating8.4 StrongOpening Duellist
Premier CS Rating20,211Top 50% of 212,910 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#79947 of 259626 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,191 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,211 -3,095 14 Jan – 16 Oct · 35 days played
13,60623,535peak 23,53514 Jan16 Oct
Faceit ELO: 3,191 +0 7 Sept – 12 Sept · 2 observations
3,1913,191peak 3,1917 Sept12 Sept
23,913Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,191Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
63Days played since 2026-01-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,191
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 — 309 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-09-07
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,324 below peak (23,535)
  • -2,420 over 30 days · declining
  • +715 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,789 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGchoaking guyFACEITLevel 10 · 3,191 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER20,211 · Pink bandPEAK ELO3,191csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim97
Positioning80
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateLWLLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +94ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 36%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 35%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Opening Duellist — Winning opening duels is what stands out in this profile (+2.2 against its own average). How often you WIN the first duel — CSDB cannot yet see how often you take it.

Aim9.7
Utility3.6
Positioning8.0
Opening Duels8.2
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong positioning

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 97 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 71% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.7
Positioning8.0
Utility3.6
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels9.2
Win Impact9.4

Composite 8.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.06
Reaction time555ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy33.3%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 33.6% → last ⅓ avg 33.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 5 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–7 · anubis, 5 Mar →
391msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · nuke, 16 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 6 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
14–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 65% over 20mirageWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB2613–1350%0.06
nukeS2013–765%0.06
mirageD123–925%0.06
infernoB115–645%0.06
anubisB115–645%0.08
dust2C104–640%0.05
ancientB84–450%0.06
overpass—11–0100%0.11
vertigo—10–10%0.20

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,238Matches
53%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
87.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
19Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis42856%1.3718.9
Nuke29651%1.5019.4
Dust218347%1.2418.1
Inferno17161%1.4320.1
Vertigo16451%1.4519.7
Mirage10147%1.1918.8
Ancient8733%1.2217.9
Overpass5857%1.3418.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

33.5%Headshot accuracy
41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.5%Spray accuracy
88.9%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
538msReaction time
71.0%T opening success
63.9%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
9.96HE damage / grenade
5.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke2–9-0.0720%16 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0147%15 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0335%10 Oct →
inferno0–7-0.0350%6 Oct →
nuke16–140.0330%5 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0324%5 Oct →
cache14–160.1121%4 Oct →
nuke13–20.0936%3 Oct →
dust24–00.1344%2 Oct →
cache3–7-0.0242%16 Sept →
anubis13–60.0329%16 Sept →
nuke13–50.0932%16 Sept →
cache8–130.0131%16 Sept →
ancient13–100.0547%12 Sept →
anubis13–80.0730%12 Sept →
mirage2–70.0722%11 Sept →
nuke13–70.0743%7 Sept →
inferno13–00.0129%6 Sept →
inferno13–110.0932%5 Sept →
ancient13–60.2437%5 Sept →
dust213–70.1738%5 Sept →
nuke13–90.1224%5 Sept →
anubis10–130.0940%29 Aug →
cache13–60.1843%29 Aug →
inferno13–60.0951%29 Aug →
cache13–50.0659%29 Aug →
cache13–110.0519%28 Aug →
ancient8–130.0628%28 Aug →
anubis7–130.0239%16 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0316%10 Aug →
mirage11–130.0115%10 Aug →
cache13–60.0622%8 Aug →
anubis13–50.2027%8 Aug →
cache13–90.0844%5 Aug →
anubis7–110.1115%5 Aug →
ancient15–150.0283%5 Aug →
anubis8–130.0917%4 Aug →
nuke13–100.0242%4 Aug →
cache13–100.1535%3 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0121%3 Aug →
dust21–8-0.0112%2 Aug →
dust27–10-0.0027%1 Aug →
inferno6–50.0722%1 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0125%1 Aug →
anubis4–110.1117%1 Aug →
nuke13–110.1119%31 Jul →
cache9–130.0727%30 Jul →
nuke13–100.0746%30 Jul →
cache13–110.0924%29 Jul →
cache4–130.0538%28 Jul →
inferno13–100.0619%27 Jul →
nuke13–80.1429%27 Jul →
cache13–70.1440%22 Jul →
cache7–130.0228%18 Jul →
anubis13–110.0723%18 Jul →
cache14–160.0531%18 Jul →
nuke13–100.1132%11 Jul →
inferno9–100.0760%5 Jul →
nuke13–160.0835%10 Jun →
anubis22–200.0916%22 May →
cache13–110.1147%13 May →
cache7–130.0150%9 May →
cache5–130.0265%9 May →
cache13–10-0.0229%8 May →
cache13–110.1227%8 May →
cache2–13-0.0225%8 May →
cache12–120.1026%8 May →
cache9–13-0.0323%8 May →
cache13–60.0524%7 May →
cache19–150.0218%2 May →
mirage5–130.0324%26 Apr →
mirage13–90.1747%25 Apr →
nuke11–130.0838%17 Apr →
ancient13–50.0339%15 Apr →
nuke16–140.0933%13 Apr →
overpass16–140.1126%31 Mar →
nuke10–130.2341%28 Mar →
inferno16–140.0929%28 Mar →
mirage2–20.0744%28 Mar →
dust213–110.0048%27 Mar →
mirage9–130.0624%27 Mar →
anubis0–7-0.00100%5 Mar →
dust211–130.0425%26 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.090%23 Feb →
vertigo12–120.2033%12 Feb →
ancient16–120.1233%11 Feb →
inferno14–160.1219%10 Feb →
nuke13–100.1123%9 Feb →
mirage13–110.0516%7 Feb →
mirage10–130.0440%7 Feb →
nuke1–60.0633%6 Feb →
dust210–130.0630%3 Feb →
inferno1–70.0740%28 Jan →
mirage0–10-0.0218%25 Jan →
inferno7–130.0131%17 Jan →
mirage5–130.0925%16 Jan →
ancient0–30.01100%16 Jan →
dust28–13-0.0121%16 Jan →
mirage13–80.1335%16 Jan →
dust23–70.1329%14 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.