Locul

Locul — CS2 Stats

76561199044995018[U:1:1084729290]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

940Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,307Top 50% of 211,494 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#95056 of 258624 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 964 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (29 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,307 -164 4 Sept – 30 Sept · 10 days played
18,60720,412peak 20,4124 Sept30 Sept
20,520Peak Premier in tracked matches
964Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-08-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 964
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 87 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,105 below peak (20,412)
  • -164 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 693 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLoculFACEITLevel 9 · 964 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,307 · Purple bandPEAK ELO964csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning52
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–46Last 10054%Win rateWWWLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 486ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility4.7
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.2
Utility4.7
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time516ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–9 · ancient, 5 Oct →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · ancient, 4 Oct →
398msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · nuke, 23 Oct →
13–3Biggest win · nuke, 23 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
12–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2110–1148%-0.01
cacheA1911–858%0.01
nukeB178–947%0.00
ancientA148–657%0.01
anubisS118–373%0.02
infernoS107–370%0.01
dust2D72–529%0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

177Matches
56%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
85.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4060%1.2617.8
Nuke3956%1.2817.2
Anubis2467%1.2219.3
Dust21926%1.0515.2
Ancient1856%1.2415.9
Cache1759%0.9817.3
Inferno1765%1.2316.2
Overpass2100%1.5615.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
71.4%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
517msReaction time
38.2%T opening success
34.0%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
3.47HE damage / grenade
9.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4776 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.1872% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–90.0122%28 Oct →
anubis13–60.0517%28 Oct →
mirage16–130.0315%28 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0315%28 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0324%27 Oct →
dust28–130.0319%27 Oct →
cache16–140.0420%27 Oct →
cache14–160.0218%26 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0310%26 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.019%26 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.029%26 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0013%25 Oct →
inferno13–50.0016%25 Oct →
nuke10–130.0316%25 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0022%24 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0223%24 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0015%23 Oct →
nuke13–30.068%23 Oct →
nuke13–110.0014%23 Oct →
inferno7–130.0121%23 Oct →
cache13–90.0324%23 Oct →
dust213–110.0126%22 Oct →
mirage13–40.047%21 Oct →
cache11–130.0129%20 Oct →
mirage11–130.0516%19 Oct →
mirage10–130.028%19 Oct →
mirage13–100.0922%18 Oct →
cache16–140.0214%18 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0626%17 Oct →
nuke11–130.0713%17 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0023%17 Oct →
ancient16–12-0.029%17 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0517%16 Oct →
cache13–100.0217%16 Oct →
ancient13–60.0223%16 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.1125%16 Oct →
ancient13–160.0217%16 Oct →
dust210–130.0021%16 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0214%15 Oct →
anubis13–60.0121%13 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0210%13 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0510%13 Oct →
nuke16–130.0418%13 Oct →
anubis19–17-0.0313%12 Oct →
nuke10–130.0815%11 Oct →
cache13–110.0316%8 Oct →
ancient13–70.059%8 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.0126%8 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0223%5 Oct →
ancient13–90.1215%5 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0116%4 Oct →
anubis13–70.0322%4 Oct →
ancient7–130.0237%4 Oct →
cache13–160.0115%4 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0016%3 Oct →
mirage13–110.0117%3 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0420%3 Oct →
nuke11–130.0028%3 Oct →
anubis12–16-0.059%3 Oct →
inferno13–50.0526%2 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0412%2 Oct →
mirage13–110.0110%1 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0022%1 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0012%1 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.087%30 Sept →
mirage8–130.0320%30 Sept →
mirage13–70.0317%30 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.0419%30 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0112%29 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0117%29 Sept →
anubis13–50.0515%28 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0726%27 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0417%27 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0120%27 Sept →
anubis11–130.0021%27 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0113%26 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0133%26 Sept →
ancient11–130.0010%26 Sept →
cache6–130.0320%24 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0212%24 Sept →
inferno13–90.0214%23 Sept →
dust213–50.0524%23 Sept →
inferno13–50.0123%23 Sept →
ancient13–40.0321%23 Sept →
anubis13–90.077%21 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0412%21 Sept →
cache16–120.0320%17 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0414%17 Sept →
cache13–110.0124%17 Sept →
dust29–130.0018%17 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0520%17 Sept →
anubis13–80.0515%17 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0221%16 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0020%16 Sept →
inferno8–130.0318%10 Sept →
anubis6–130.0326%10 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0516%4 Sept →
mirage13–60.0026%4 Sept →
inferno8–130.0623%13 Aug →
cache8–130.0517%13 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.