Marsuu

Marsuu — CS2 Stats

76561199044054855[U:1:1083789127]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,955Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating13,467Blue band · top ~36.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 15 days played since 4 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,467 -730 4 Jul12 Sept · 10 days played
9,88014,197peak 14,1974 Jul12 Sept
14,197Peak Premier in tracked matches
15Days played since 2026-07-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 730 below peak (14,197)
  • +3,468 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,533 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMarsuuFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER13,467 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning51
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48466Last 10048%Win rateLLLLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+3.4 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility2.4
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch8.0

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.1
Utility2.4
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time522ms−80ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms
Headshot accuracy11.0%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 13.1% → last ⅓ avg 11.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 8–13 · mirage, 31 Jul
25%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · anubis, 1 Aug
359msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · nuke, 22 Aug
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 31 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
72In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 12infernoWeakest map · 0% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC30131743%-0.01
ancientA138562%0.01
vertigoA138562%-0.01
anubisS128467%-0.01
cacheD113827%-0.01
nukeB84450%0.02
infernoD7070%0.00
dust232167%0.02
overpass21150%-0.05
boulder110100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

47Matches
53%Win rate
0.70Avg K/D
76.5ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

60%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1258%0.8413.4
Ancient450%0.6812.0
Inferno250%1.0617.0
Nuke2100%0.9210.5
Vertigo2100%0.5411.0
Anubis10%0.477.0
Overpass10%0.9417.0
Dust21100%0.204.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.6%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.0%Spray accuracy
72.0%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
532msReaction time
42.3%T opening success
36.1%CT opening success
0.30Enemies flashed / flash
0.8%Flash assists
5.80HE damage / grenade
1.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.5665% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2958 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.1465% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient3–13-0.0316%19 Sept
cache3–13-0.0321%19 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0514%19 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0810%12 Sept
overpass13–8-0.0113%12 Sept
mirage10–130.0416%12 Sept
vertigo9–30.1115%4 Sept
anubis13–80.0110%4 Sept
overpass5–9-0.082%4 Sept
vertigo5–9-0.069%4 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0415%4 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0210%4 Sept
anubis13–60.037%4 Sept
mirage16–14-0.017%4 Sept
vertigo13–11-0.067%4 Sept
vertigo9–13-0.048%4 Sept
vertigo2–0-0.010%4 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0513%29 Aug
mirage9–13-0.049%29 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0115%28 Aug
mirage13–10-0.038%28 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0517%28 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0312%28 Aug
mirage13–9-0.038%28 Aug
anubis13–160.0116%28 Aug
mirage13–110.0113%28 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0015%28 Aug
ancient13–6-0.036%28 Aug
nuke16–120.0711%28 Aug
ancient13–80.0711%28 Aug
vertigo13–5-0.0011%28 Aug
vertigo6–13-0.0218%28 Aug
nuke3–13-0.060%22 Aug
cache13–90.0824%22 Aug
vertigo13–9-0.0613%22 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0210%22 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0114%22 Aug
anubis13–90.0014%22 Aug
mirage13–50.0514%22 Aug
vertigo13–90.018%22 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0616%22 Aug
ancient13–7-0.019%14 Aug
nuke13–80.0911%14 Aug
mirage0–13-0.1110%14 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0016%14 Aug
ancient3–130.0311%14 Aug
dust210–130.0317%14 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0210%14 Aug
vertigo13–80.049%14 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0416%8 Aug
cache7–13-0.062%8 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0513%8 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0118%8 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0213%7 Aug
mirage15–15-0.063%7 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0511%7 Aug
cache13–9-0.048%7 Aug
mirage13–30.087%7 Aug
dust213–80.0210%7 Aug
mirage13–160.0112%7 Aug
ancient13–70.0210%7 Aug
mirage13–60.0111%7 Aug
vertigo13–80.0212%7 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0416%1 Aug
anubis13–90.0525%1 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0221%1 Aug
boulder13–11-0.0511%31 Jul
cache16–120.0714%31 Jul
mirage8–130.138%31 Jul
nuke13–80.039%31 Jul
nuke6–130.0918%31 Jul
ancient13–40.0614%31 Jul
mirage13–20.0110%31 Jul
vertigo6–13-0.0515%31 Jul
cache4–13-0.0215%12 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0110%12 Jul
mirage14–160.0616%11 Jul
nuke7–130.0315%11 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0512%11 Jul
cache6–130.0317%10 Jul
anubis8–130.0113%10 Jul
cache10–13-0.0611%10 Jul
cache5–13-0.047%10 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0618%10 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0316%10 Jul
mirage8–130.0019%10 Jul
inferno10–130.0417%10 Jul
anubis1–13-0.077%10 Jul
cache4–13-0.086%10 Jul
anubis8–13-0.019%10 Jul
ancient10–130.0015%10 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0715%10 Jul
cache12–120.0310%10 Jul
inferno2–130.048%10 Jul
mirage13–70.029%4 Jul
ancient6–130.0615%4 Jul
dust213–50.0115%4 Jul
anubis13–20.0214%4 Jul
mirage13–60.0210%4 Jul
inferno8–130.0123%4 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →