Kutekitten13

Kutekitten13 — CS2 Stats

76561199038155461[U:1:1077889733]Steam profile ↗

744Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,581Purple band · top ~18.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17130 of 32538 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,159 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKutekitten13FACEITLevel 7 · 1,159 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,581 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning42
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48493Last 10048%Win rateLWLWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1
Aggression5.7
Utility4.5
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.2
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time615ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms
Headshot accuracy26.6%−4.4%
first ⅓ avg 30.9% → last ⅓ avg 26.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.33Best rating — mirage 13–0
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
62In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9mirageWeakest map · 41% over 34
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC34142041%0.03
nukeC146843%-0.01
infernoB136746%-0.02
cacheB126650%0.03
dust2B126650%0.05
ancientS96367%0.05
anubis330100%0.04
vertigo2020%-0.02
alpine110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 34). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

89Matches
56%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
86.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2763%1.5417.7
Ancient1656%1.1618.8
Dust21553%1.3119.0
Nuke1369%1.3319.8
Inferno838%1.0813.8
Cache333%0.8513.3
Overpass250%1.1412.5
Train2100%1.0318.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
614msReaction time
25.7%T opening success
46.5%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
7.62HE damage / grenade
8.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4724 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.6872% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 34 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.0114%29 Aug
cache13–110.0113%22 Aug
dust23–130.0124%22 Aug
ancient16–120.0119%22 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0322%22 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0427%22 Aug
inferno9–60.0762%22 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1338%22 Aug
cache8–130.0225%22 Aug
mirage6–13-0.1113%17 Aug
nuke13–100.0522%13 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0156%11 Aug
mirage13–50.0416%11 Aug
mirage13–00.3344%11 Aug
dust213–100.0128%9 Aug
ancient13–90.0333%1 Aug
nuke2–13-0.1210%1 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0124%30 Jul
nuke6–130.0320%30 Jul
dust213–60.0721%30 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0432%30 Jul
dust24–13-0.0228%30 Jul
mirage10–130.0017%29 Jul
inferno13–80.0224%29 Jul
mirage7–130.1220%27 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0436%27 Jul
cache6–130.0824%27 Jul
dust213–80.1721%27 Jul
dust20–7-0.0533%26 Jul
mirage9–130.0832%26 Jul
mirage13–110.1829%26 Jul
dust213–10.1938%26 Jul
vertigo9–130.0214%25 Jul
nuke13–60.0744%25 Jul
mirage13–30.0132%25 Jul
mirage12–120.1218%25 Jul
ancient13–40.1662%25 Jul
dust20–13-0.0222%25 Jul
nuke13–00.000%25 Jul
ancient7–130.0426%25 Jul
cache13–70.2032%24 Jul
inferno1–9-0.1914%24 Jul
inferno9–50.0738%24 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0020%21 Jul
cache13–100.0616%21 Jul
anubis13–110.029%21 Jul
inferno13–80.0622%21 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0811%21 Jul
mirage10–130.0522%21 Jul
dust26–130.0239%21 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0327%21 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0218%21 Jul
ancient16–130.0711%19 Jul
cache6–130.0126%17 Jul
mirage2–13-0.1113%17 Jul
nuke6–130.0023%17 Jul
mirage13–100.0323%16 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0612%15 Jul
nuke7–12-0.0525%13 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0113%12 Jul
cache13–60.0215%12 Jul
cache10–13-0.0126%12 Jul
inferno13–90.0129%12 Jul
mirage10–130.0118%11 Jul
cache16–13-0.0217%11 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0431%11 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0621%11 Jul
mirage13–10.0929%11 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0332%11 Jul
mirage13–60.0530%11 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0311%10 Jul
mirage16–120.0413%10 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0419%9 Jul
cache11–13-0.0142%9 Jul
anubis13–20.1221%9 Jul
cache13–70.0416%9 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0325%8 Jul
mirage1–130.0229%8 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0725%8 Jul
dust213–80.1235%8 Jul
inferno8–8-0.0733%7 Jul
alpine11–80.1031%6 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0220%6 Jul
nuke13–30.0338%6 Jul
mirage3–13-0.058%5 Jul
cache11–130.0152%5 Jul
mirage13–110.0727%5 Jul
mirage13–50.0733%5 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0275%5 Jul
vertigo8–13-0.0745%4 Jul
mirage6–130.0833%4 Jul
dust23–130.0658%3 Jul
dust213–80.0228%3 Jul
mirage10–130.0559%3 Jul
mirage13–90.0120%2 Jul
ancient12–120.0446%2 Jul
nuke13–00.000%2 Jul
mirage13–110.0336%2 Jul
ancient13–30.1121%2 Jul
mirage6–130.0431%2 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →