FluFFy♡

FluFFy♡ — CS2 Stats

NO76561199033505301[U:1:1073239573]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,310Tracked matches61%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating14,875Blue band · top ~29.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,875 -532 22 Oct – 25 Oct · 3 days played
14,87515,407peak 15,40722 Oct25 Oct
15,787Peak Premier in tracked matches
15Days played since 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 532 below peak (15,407)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 125 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFluFFy♡FACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER14,875 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning63
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–47–9Last 10044%Win rateLLWLWTLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating · −2.2pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.7
Utility6.1
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch5.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning6.3
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact8.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time574ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 11–13 · nuke, 25 Oct →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · vertigo, 10 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · vertigo, 16 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · vertigo, 25 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 16infernoWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeB2111–1052%-0.02
mirageA1610–663%0.01
nukeC146–843%0.03
infernoD133–1023%-0.01
vertigoD93–633%0.00
dust2C83–538%-0.00
ancientB84–450%0.01
cacheC83–538%0.00
anubis—11–0100%0.07
overpass—10–10%-0.09
italy—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

83Matches
48%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
78.7ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2152%1.2012.8
Anubis1450%1.0815.3
Ancient1258%0.7912.9
Nuke1173%1.5420.2
Dust2911%0.7612.4
Vertigo838%1.1715.3
Inferno633%0.9814.3
Train250%1.3213.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
72.4%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
562msReaction time
38.2%T opening success
57.9%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
11.34HE damage / grenade
10.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.2208% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–130.2120%25 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0511%25 Oct →
mirage13–90.1017%25 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0312%25 Oct →
vertigo13–00.0211%25 Oct →
inferno12–12-0.0412%25 Oct →
mirage7–130.0117%24 Oct →
nuke13–80.019%24 Oct →
ancient13–70.0414%24 Oct →
mirage13–30.0822%24 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0718%24 Oct →
inferno16–12-0.0422%24 Oct →
nuke13–80.0220%23 Oct →
office12–12-0.0121%23 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0119%22 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0314%22 Oct →
dust23–13-0.076%22 Oct →
office5–13-0.0612%22 Oct →
office13–9-0.0618%22 Oct →
office9–13-0.0419%22 Oct →
ancient13–40.0213%22 Oct →
dust213–80.0226%22 Oct →
mirage7–00.0211%22 Oct →
mirage13–90.0513%22 Oct →
mirage13–100.035%22 Oct →
nuke13–80.1115%22 Oct →
nuke13–20.0520%22 Oct →
inferno14–160.0111%22 Oct →
cache13–110.0920%21 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0116%21 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0210%21 Oct →
dust26–130.0112%21 Oct →
anubis13–30.0724%21 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0110%21 Oct →
ancient6–130.0013%21 Oct →
mirage13–70.022%21 Oct →
office13–70.0132%21 Oct →
office9–13-0.0618%21 Oct →
mirage13–60.0527%21 Oct →
vertigo4–13-0.0516%21 Oct →
cache3–130.0030%21 Oct →
cache13–40.068%21 Oct →
dust29–00.0318%21 Oct →
overpass5–13-0.0920%18 Oct →
ancient13–100.0411%18 Oct →
ancient12–120.0618%17 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0522%17 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0122%17 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0219%17 Oct →
mirage9–130.0116%17 Oct →
vertigo10–13-0.0220%16 Oct →
office6–13-0.0321%16 Oct →
office13–8-0.0829%16 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.078%16 Oct →
italy2–7-0.0725%16 Oct →
nuke11–130.0621%16 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0318%16 Oct →
office13–50.0326%16 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0712%16 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0218%16 Oct →
inferno4–130.0217%15 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.0714%15 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0617%15 Oct →
nuke5–130.0311%15 Oct →
cache13–110.0212%15 Oct →
office13–10-0.0219%15 Oct →
office12–12-0.0412%15 Oct →
office13–10-0.058%15 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0629%14 Oct →
vertigo4–130.0119%14 Oct →
mirage13–100.0117%14 Oct →
cache12–12-0.0123%14 Oct →
office13–7-0.0322%14 Oct →
office13–90.0424%14 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0019%14 Oct →
office13–110.0321%13 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0110%12 Oct →
inferno11–130.0825%12 Oct →
vertigo13–70.0414%12 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.047%12 Oct →
office7–130.0326%12 Oct →
office13–50.1018%12 Oct →
inferno13–30.0117%12 Oct →
office13–4-0.0120%12 Oct →
vertigo4–13-0.0221%12 Oct →
nuke13–70.1010%12 Oct →
vertigo9–130.0122%12 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0617%10 Oct →
dust23–70.015%10 Oct →
office12–120.027%10 Oct →
vertigo6–13-0.0119%10 Oct →
office11–13-0.0730%10 Oct →
vertigo13–60.0640%10 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0417%9 Oct →
nuke13–30.0810%9 Oct →
inferno5–130.0431%9 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0215%9 Oct →
dust213–20.0716%9 Oct →
office4–13-0.0911%9 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0433%5 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.