nopo

nopo — CS2 Stats

76561199032328620[U:1:1072062892]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,620Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21736 of 260020 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,027 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (46 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,620 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 +687 30 Jan – 20 Sept · 19 days played
24,31326,236peak 26,23630 Jan20 Sept
26,260Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,027Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-01-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,027
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 473 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-20
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,236 below peak (26,236)
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnopoFACEITLevel 10 · 2,027 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,027csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning55
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–47–5Last 10048%Win rateLLLLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · +43ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.4
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.5
Utility6.4
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time603ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 9–6 · inferno, 10 Feb →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 9–7 · sanctum, 10 Feb →
352msFastest reaction time · 5–2 · nuke, 13 Feb →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 30 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L5Current streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 69% over 16ancientWeakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2712–1544%0.01
mirageB2612–1446%0.00
ancientD175–1229%-0.00
anubisS1611–569%0.01
nukeS64–267%0.01
infernoB63–350%0.01
overpass—10–10%-0.01
sanctum—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

528Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
82.5ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13952%1.0916.1
Ancient9844%1.1016.1
Inferno6853%1.1014.6
Dust25758%1.1816.7
Anubis5351%1.1116.6
Nuke3549%1.0516.2
Vertigo757%0.6811.6
Train757%1.1320.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.6%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
611msReaction time
36.1%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
8.03HE damage / grenade
10.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.0565% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–13-0.0326%27 Mar →
ancient14–16-0.0518%26 Mar →
anubis6–13-0.0013%25 Mar →
dust29–130.0326%25 Mar →
anubis8–130.0224%22 Mar →
anubis13–100.0319%20 Mar →
dust213–9-0.0022%20 Mar →
anubis13–90.0133%19 Mar →
dust213–30.0720%19 Mar →
nuke8–130.0926%19 Mar →
ancient11–13-0.0518%19 Mar →
inferno2–9-0.0715%18 Mar →
ancient13–50.0526%18 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0315%18 Mar →
dust213–16-0.0427%18 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0222%13 Mar →
dust213–40.0222%13 Mar →
inferno10–130.0423%12 Mar →
anubis13–110.0119%12 Mar →
mirage13–60.0321%11 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0212%11 Mar →
dust213–70.0124%11 Mar →
mirage13–9-0.0117%5 Mar →
mirage13–110.0112%4 Mar →
dust213–60.0826%4 Mar →
ancient2–13-0.0620%4 Mar →
dust212–12-0.0118%4 Mar →
inferno13–100.0113%4 Mar →
mirage13–70.0722%3 Mar →
dust213–100.0538%2 Mar →
nuke9–13-0.0026%1 Mar →
anubis3–13-0.0718%1 Mar →
ancient15–150.0522%1 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0125%1 Mar →
dust214–160.1021%28 Feb →
mirage12–120.0629%28 Feb →
mirage13–20.0319%25 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0527%25 Feb →
ancient6–13-0.0629%25 Feb →
overpass5–13-0.0118%20 Feb →
dust212–120.0218%20 Feb →
dust213–70.0129%20 Feb →
ancient9–130.0015%19 Feb →
mirage11–130.0120%19 Feb →
anubis13–90.0818%18 Feb →
ancient13–11-0.0527%17 Feb →
dust211–130.0419%17 Feb →
ancient13–90.0122%17 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0322%17 Feb →
mirage16–140.0026%16 Feb →
mirage7–130.0520%16 Feb →
mirage12–120.0332%16 Feb →
mirage0–13-0.080%16 Feb →
mirage1–13-0.0624%16 Feb →
dust213–60.0730%16 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.0213%15 Feb →
dust213–50.0617%15 Feb →
nuke5–2-0.0314%13 Feb →
dust213–30.0223%13 Feb →
anubis9–130.0026%13 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0530%12 Feb →
mirage11–130.0633%12 Feb →
ancient8–130.0020%12 Feb →
nuke13–5-0.1020%12 Feb →
sanctum9–7-0.0341%10 Feb →
inferno9–60.1218%10 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.0136%10 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.0320%9 Feb →
dust213–5-0.0518%9 Feb →
mirage13–8-0.0322%9 Feb →
anubis16–130.0217%9 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0627%6 Feb →
anubis13–60.0224%6 Feb →
nuke13–90.1219%5 Feb →
ancient13–90.0319%5 Feb →
ancient11–130.0420%5 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0130%5 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0116%5 Feb →
ancient11–130.0416%5 Feb →
mirage16–130.0621%4 Feb →
mirage13–80.0315%4 Feb →
dust27–13-0.0414%4 Feb →
mirage16–140.0320%4 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0519%4 Feb →
anubis13–11-0.0425%4 Feb →
anubis13–20.0927%4 Feb →
dust210–130.0127%4 Feb →
ancient10–130.0123%1 Feb →
dust213–90.0418%1 Feb →
anubis16–130.0319%1 Feb →
ancient13–80.0214%1 Feb →
mirage7–130.0234%1 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0022%1 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0327%1 Feb →
dust210–130.0331%1 Feb →
anubis16–130.0518%1 Feb →
anubis16–14-0.0017%30 Jan →
mirage13–1-0.0313%30 Jan →
dust22–13-0.0123%30 Jan →
ancient9–13-0.0316%30 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.