B34V1S

B34V1S — CS2 Stats

76561199031163410[U:1:1070897682]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,261Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,810Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12996 of 222646 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,310 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 12 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,810 -937 12 Aug16 Sept · 15 days played
25,23626,747peak 26,74712 Aug16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 3,310 +0 31 Aug7 Sept · 3 observations
3,3103,310peak 3,31031 Aug7 Sept
27,220Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,310Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-08-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,310
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 190 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-31
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 937 below peak (26,747)
  • -629 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,190 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGB34V1SFACEITLevel 10 · 3,310 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,810 · Red bandPEAK ELO3,310csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning71
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52417Last 10052%Win rateWTWWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · +73ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 1352 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.1
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels7.1
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning7.1
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact8.6

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time543ms+60ms
first ⅓ avg 483ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–4 · overpass, 23 Aug
60%Best headshot accuracy · 2–8 · mirage, 30 Aug
313msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · vertigo, 19 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 30 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 38% over 37
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC37142338%0.02
ancientA127558%0.01
vertigoA127558%0.02
anubisA95456%0.01
dust2S86275%-0.01
trainS64267%0.03
nukeS65183%0.04
infernoC52340%-0.04
overpass220100%0.23
cache1010%0.07
debris1010%0.06
poseidon1010%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 37). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,623Matches
53%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
76.5ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
24Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage74752%1.0315.6
Ancient50550%1.0015.0
Anubis41656%1.0415.1
Dust229357%1.0715.5
Inferno16055%1.0214.9
Vertigo11157%1.0715.7
Overpass3456%0.9613.6
Nuke2040%0.9213.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
522msReaction time
48.9%T opening success
61.5%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
13.3%Flash assists
6.03HE damage / grenade
4.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 37 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–90.0914%16 Sept
mirage12–120.0116%16 Sept
ancient6–10.1019%16 Sept
anubis13–50.0013%16 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0113%16 Sept
dust213–40.0018%16 Sept
anubis10–130.1020%16 Sept
dust213–70.0325%16 Sept
ancient4–13-0.038%16 Sept
mirage3–130.0735%13 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0714%10 Sept
dust213–50.054%9 Sept
mirage13–100.0615%9 Sept
ancient13–50.0115%9 Sept
mirage13–110.0423%9 Sept
train13–100.0116%8 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0210%8 Sept
mirage13–10.1022%8 Sept
mirage13–80.0226%6 Sept
mirage13–60.1227%5 Sept
mirage13–60.1127%4 Sept
mirage0–13-0.0150%4 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0220%4 Sept
ancient13–40.0013%4 Sept
mirage9–130.0130%4 Sept
vertigo13–10-0.0214%3 Sept
train13–9-0.0023%3 Sept
mirage11–130.0932%1 Sept
cache11–130.0717%1 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0011%31 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0424%31 Aug
mirage2–80.0460%30 Aug
mirage13–00.0232%30 Aug
mirage8–130.0426%30 Aug
vertigo9–70.0530%29 Aug
overpass9–10.2213%29 Aug
mirage9–130.0415%28 Aug
dust21–2-0.0527%27 Aug
vertigo4–00.0215%27 Aug
mirage5–130.0118%27 Aug
vertigo9–50.1329%27 Aug
vertigo9–50.0621%27 Aug
train10–130.0226%26 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0223%25 Aug
debris8–80.0623%25 Aug
mirage5–130.1026%25 Aug
ancient13–80.0114%25 Aug
vertigo5–9-0.1414%25 Aug
vertigo12–120.0226%25 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0514%25 Aug
mirage1–6-0.0111%25 Aug
train13–110.0833%24 Aug
overpass9–40.2337%23 Aug
vertigo12–120.0311%21 Aug
inferno0–13-0.010%20 Aug
mirage2–130.0447%20 Aug
nuke13–80.0118%20 Aug
poseidon1–9-0.1210%20 Aug
vertigo9–30.079%20 Aug
vertigo12–120.0118%20 Aug
anubis13–50.0613%19 Aug
dust213–11-0.0228%19 Aug
vertigo0–13-0.0620%19 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0420%18 Aug
ancient12–120.0326%18 Aug
vertigo13–110.0513%18 Aug
train13–90.0522%18 Aug
train6–130.0116%18 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0023%17 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0123%17 Aug
mirage17–190.0022%17 Aug
mirage3–130.0333%16 Aug
ancient13–40.0717%16 Aug
anubis13–40.0433%16 Aug
mirage13–100.1027%16 Aug
inferno13–2-0.035%16 Aug
anubis19–15-0.0325%16 Aug
mirage13–30.0115%16 Aug
dust213–10-0.0024%15 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0215%15 Aug
ancient13–30.0312%15 Aug
mirage7–13-0.119%15 Aug
mirage13–00.1624%14 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0620%14 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0116%14 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0417%14 Aug
ancient16–130.029%14 Aug
nuke8–130.0918%14 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0416%13 Aug
nuke13–20.1216%13 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0336%13 Aug
dust29–13-0.0118%13 Aug
mirage12–160.0527%13 Aug
mirage13–110.0215%13 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0624%13 Aug
nuke13–50.0616%12 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0618%12 Aug
anubis0–13-0.050%12 Aug
dust213–2-0.0613%12 Aug
mirage7–13-0.046%12 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →