Lazarus

Lazarus — CS2 Stats

CI76561199020359282[U:1:1060093554]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,132Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,485Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#51020 of 261581 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,000 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,132 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,485 +3,098 2 Jul – 25 Oct · 38 days played
17,97123,157peak 23,1572 Jul25 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,000 +0 28 Aug – 25 Oct · 4 observations
1,0001,000peak 1,00028 Aug25 Oct
23,157Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,000Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-07-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,000
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 51 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 672 below peak (23,157)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • +3,158 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,515 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLazarusFACEITLevel 5 · 1,000 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER22,485 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,000csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning42
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateLWWLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · +50ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility6.2
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.2
Utility6.2
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time515ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 557ms → last ⅓ avg 515ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 26 Jul →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 16 Aug →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · dust2, 30 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 25 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
12–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 39% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2811–1739%0.00
dust2B2714–1352%-0.00
cacheS128–467%0.00
nukeS96–367%0.00
infernoA95–456%-0.02
anubisA74–357%-0.02
ancientA74–357%-0.02
office—11–0100%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 28). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

32Matches
59%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
81.1ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
6%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2771%1.1216.3
Mirage667%1.2519.7
Inferno40%0.7912.3
Ancient425%0.8615.3
Nuke367%0.9215.0
Anubis1100%0.808.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
507msReaction time
34.7%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
14.25HE damage / grenade
14.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.7307% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.039%10 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0518%10 Sept →
cache13–30.0310%10 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0612%9 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0524%8 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0420%8 Sept →
inferno13–90.0214%2 Sept →
mirage13–50.0014%2 Sept →
anubis13–70.0211%31 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0023%31 Aug →
dust213–90.0821%30 Aug →
nuke13–50.025%30 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0723%29 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0214%29 Aug →
mirage12–120.0610%26 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0610%26 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0116%23 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0419%23 Aug →
mirage13–70.0512%20 Aug →
dust213–30.0816%20 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0118%19 Aug →
dust213–11-0.016%17 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0216%17 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0325%16 Aug →
dust29–130.0136%16 Aug →
ancient16–140.0515%12 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0417%11 Aug →
cache15–15-0.048%10 Aug →
anubis13–40.0510%10 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0612%9 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.075%9 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0118%8 Aug →
cache13–60.0020%5 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0523%30 Jul →
inferno16–13-0.026%29 Jul →
cache16–14-0.0414%28 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0120%28 Jul →
dust213–70.0519%27 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0618%26 Jul →
inferno13–90.0314%26 Jul →
mirage16–140.0422%26 Jul →
mirage13–60.1134%26 Jul →
mirage14–160.016%25 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0317%25 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0120%25 Jul →
ancient13–110.038%25 Jul →
cache13–20.0421%25 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.0120%25 Jul →
dust28–130.0122%24 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0324%24 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0316%24 Jul →
dust213–50.0518%23 Jul →
cache13–60.0018%23 Jul →
dust215–15-0.027%23 Jul →
mirage13–80.0020%22 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0013%22 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0019%22 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0117%21 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0017%21 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0213%20 Jul →
cache10–130.0824%19 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.035%19 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0422%19 Jul →
nuke13–90.026%19 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0212%19 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0911%19 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0421%19 Jul →
dust216–140.0531%18 Jul →
mirage13–70.0934%18 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0612%18 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0418%18 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.007%17 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0520%16 Jul →
mirage6–130.0424%16 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.019%12 Jul →
nuke13–30.033%12 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0414%12 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0714%12 Jul →
dust213–50.0435%12 Jul →
nuke13–100.0014%12 Jul →
mirage10–130.0210%12 Jul →
nuke13–4-0.0014%12 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.004%11 Jul →
dust28–130.0012%11 Jul →
cache10–130.0118%11 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0411%11 Jul →
mirage16–120.0313%9 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0216%8 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0319%6 Jul →
nuke13–40.0518%6 Jul →
inferno13–100.0414%6 Jul →
mirage13–50.0415%6 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0510%5 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0013%5 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0011%5 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.066%3 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0213%3 Jul →
dust213–90.0822%2 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0533%2 Jul →
office13–8-0.0721%2 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.