Kr0m

Kr0m — CS2 Stats

76561199013700202[U:1:1053434474]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,156Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,365 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (46 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,365 → 2,365
+38Tracked matches · now 1,156
+6.7ppWin rate · 50.0% → 56.7%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,365 +0 9 Sept – 11 Sept · 2 observations
2,3652,365peak 2,3659 Sept11 Sept
2,365Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-02-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,365
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 135 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKr0mFACEITLevel 10 · 2,365 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,365csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning61
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–47Last 10053%Win rateWWWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +8.4pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate up 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 461ms

Last 10

  • 9–1 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility6.1
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.1
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time493ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 493ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 4–13 · inferno, 25 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · inferno, 25 Jul →
359msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 2 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 1 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W7Current streak
15–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 9mirageWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB2713–1448%0.00
ancientA2615–1158%0.01
infernoA116–555%0.04
cacheB115–645%0.00
mirageC104–640%-0.01
nukeS96–367%0.02
vertigo—43–175%0.00
dust2—21–150%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

964Matches
52%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
81.0ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient21158%1.2416.8
Mirage17250%1.1016.6
Inferno15049%1.1817.4
Nuke12653%1.1716.4
Anubis11046%1.1015.6
Dust24852%1.1816.6
Train4264%1.2418.8
Overpass2850%1.1617.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.4%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
487msReaction time
42.3%T opening success
29.0%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
8.83HE damage / grenade
18.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4484 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 29.0314% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–60.0820%26 Oct →
anubis16–14-0.0720%26 Oct →
inferno13–80.0532%23 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0421%21 Oct →
inferno13–50.0638%20 Oct →
ancient13–50.1035%1 Oct →
inferno13–20.0818%1 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0427%13 Sept →
anubis22–190.0016%13 Sept →
cache13–90.0022%13 Sept →
ancient13–110.1020%12 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0413%5 Sept →
inferno10–130.0218%5 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.028%5 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0214%5 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0116%2 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0425%31 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.027%26 Aug →
ancient11–130.0336%23 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.077%19 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0411%19 Aug →
anubis13–100.0314%19 Aug →
mirage13–100.0417%14 Aug →
anubis13–100.0223%13 Aug →
nuke13–20.0823%12 Aug →
cache14–16-0.0214%11 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0322%9 Aug →
nuke9–130.0223%9 Aug →
vertigo7–13-0.0020%9 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0115%8 Aug →
vertigo13–3-0.0114%8 Aug →
ancient13–70.0319%8 Aug →
mirage16–140.0012%8 Aug →
dust213–110.0322%7 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0019%6 Aug →
anubis14–160.0525%6 Aug →
nuke13–90.0833%5 Aug →
vertigo13–100.0336%5 Aug →
vertigo13–90.0020%5 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0213%3 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0514%3 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0412%3 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0124%3 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0114%3 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0118%3 Aug →
cache13–90.0521%3 Aug →
anubis13–60.0920%3 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0018%3 Aug →
cache8–130.0213%3 Aug →
cache13–110.0326%3 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0627%3 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0523%2 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0121%2 Aug →
inferno13–110.0220%2 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0623%2 Aug →
anubis13–110.0518%30 Jul →
nuke13–110.0113%30 Jul →
ancient13–60.0819%30 Jul →
nuke13–90.0023%29 Jul →
cache13–70.0621%29 Jul →
nuke13–40.0933%29 Jul →
ancient3–130.0313%28 Jul →
cache13–110.0725%28 Jul →
ancient13–40.0424%27 Jul →
ancient13–30.0115%27 Jul →
ancient13–100.0228%27 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0222%27 Jul →
inferno4–130.1450%25 Jul →
anubis13–30.0821%24 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0626%17 Jul →
anubis13–70.0034%17 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0716%17 Jul →
anubis10–130.0424%16 Jul →
anubis13–30.0824%16 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0624%13 Jul →
ancient13–160.0420%13 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0433%13 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0611%12 Jul →
ancient13–100.0823%12 Jul →
anubis7–130.0017%12 Jul →
ancient13–80.018%10 Jul →
inferno11–130.0411%3 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0417%3 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0218%3 Jul →
ancient13–4-0.0130%3 Jul →
mirage8–130.0123%2 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0615%30 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0225%15 May →
anubis9–130.0725%7 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0125%7 Apr →
anubis13–11-0.0027%4 Apr →
anubis9–130.0121%4 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0228%14 Feb →
ancient19–170.0022%12 Feb →
inferno13–70.0522%11 Feb →
inferno16–14-0.0214%11 Feb →
mirage11–130.0423%11 Feb →
anubis12–16-0.0527%10 Feb →
ancient13–50.0119%10 Feb →
mirage13–8-0.017%8 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.