ztr

ztr — CS2 Stats

PRO“warlock”Fokus ClanSwedenIGLSettings & gear profile →

76561199009468655[U:1:1049202927]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,271Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,764 → 3,764
+27Tracked matches · now 4,271
+6.7ppWin rate · 46.7% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,764 +0 28 Aug – 23 Sept · 7 observations
3,7643,764peak 3,76428 Aug23 Sept
3,764Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-06-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,764
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 236 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGztr30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO3,764csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning54
Utility81

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–50Last 10050%Win rateWLLLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +9.9pp headshot accuracy · −73ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 472ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.4 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility8.1
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 81 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.4
Utility8.1
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time558ms+81ms
first ⅓ avg 477ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–7 · overpass, 23 Jun →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 2 Oct →
328msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · mirage, 25 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 2 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
12–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 79% over 19infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2212–1055%-0.01
cacheS1915–479%-0.01
dust2B179–853%-0.01
ancientC156–940%-0.02
mirageD143–1121%-0.02
infernoD71–614%-0.01
anubisA53–260%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,329Matches
61%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
82.8ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
22Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage24169%1.3316.9
Ancient19363%1.2015.6
Dust27468%1.0917.0
Nuke6263%1.0915.0
Anubis6063%1.1115.4
Vertigo3977%1.3116.9
Overpass3546%1.0314.5
Inferno3471%1.1916.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$5,189Inventory value42ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ Butterfly Knife | Autotronic (Field-Tested)$1,365★ Talon Knife | Fade (Factory New)$1,208★ Specialist Gloves | Cloud Chaser (Battle-Scarred)$612★ Sport Gloves | Amphibious (Field-Tested)$458M4A1-S | Printstream (Minimal Wear)$421AK-47 | Leet Museo (Minimal Wear)$420

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
73.1%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
550msReaction time
32.4%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
12.5%Flash assists
11.06HE damage / grenade
15.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.3764% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–50.0340%2 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0316%2 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0222%2 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0316%2 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0222%2 Oct →
nuke13–50.0340%2 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0023%2 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0023%2 Oct →
cache13–1-0.0218%2 Oct →
cache13–1-0.0218%2 Oct →
cache13–10.0510%2 Oct →
cache13–10.0510%2 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0422%2 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0422%2 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0311%2 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0311%2 Oct →
mirage20–22-0.0513%28 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0019%28 Sept →
cache13–70.0013%27 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.047%27 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0333%26 Sept →
nuke13–60.0211%26 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0115%26 Sept →
dust213–3-0.079%21 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0318%21 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0418%21 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0318%21 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0418%21 Sept →
dust213–3-0.079%21 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0424%21 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0329%21 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0424%21 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0329%21 Sept →
dust213–110.0521%21 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0219%21 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0219%21 Sept →
dust213–110.0521%21 Sept →
anubis9–130.0620%16 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0619%13 Sept →
dust213–110.0022%13 Sept →
nuke7–130.0310%13 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0217%12 Sept →
anubis13–2-0.005%12 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0110%12 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0118%12 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0112%12 Sept →
cache19–170.0120%10 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0120%10 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0113%9 Sept →
mirage13–100.0223%9 Sept →
nuke10–130.0521%6 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0511%6 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0625%6 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0521%5 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0213%5 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0215%5 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0120%4 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0315%4 Sept →
nuke8–130.0622%4 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.068%4 Sept →
nuke19–16-0.0016%4 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0510%4 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0121%4 Sept →
ancient16–130.0115%3 Sept →
nuke13–60.0317%3 Sept →
inferno3–90.0233%29 Aug →
dust213–70.0321%29 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0110%27 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.0520%27 Aug →
inferno4–130.0111%9 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0520%9 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0419%9 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0416%8 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0220%8 Aug →
ancient13–1-0.018%7 Aug →
inferno16–120.0116%7 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0411%25 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0024%25 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0414%23 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0521%23 Jul →
nuke7–130.0217%23 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0223%23 Jul →
dust213–40.0517%23 Jul →
nuke1–13-0.0715%21 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0115%21 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0112%21 Jul →
nuke19–160.0231%14 Jul →
ancient13–100.0721%13 Jul →
mirage10–130.0121%13 Jul →
mirage10–130.0017%5 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0312%25 Jun →
nuke4–13-0.0616%25 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.0518%24 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0519%24 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0322%23 Jun →
overpass13–70.0712%23 Jun →
nuke13–60.0023%23 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0213%21 Jun →
dust213–100.0316%21 Jun →
nuke16–19-0.0514%21 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

3K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.