CuddlesTheBear

CuddlesTheBear — CS2 Stats

76561199001151387[U:1:1040885659]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

424Tracked matches64%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 4 Dec 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,497 +3,854 8 Dec30 May · 19 days played
12,64316,497peak 16,4978 Dec30 May
16,497Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2024-12-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCuddlesTheBearFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning64
Utility20

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55414Last 10055%Win rateWWLWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.7pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 655ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility2.0
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 664ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning6.4
Utility2.0
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact9.8

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time652ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 687ms → last ⅓ avg 652ms
Headshot accuracy28.3%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 25.3% → last ⅓ avg 28.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 3–0 · mirage, 1 Jan
62%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · mirage, 1 Jan
500msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 6 May
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 3 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA25151060%0.01
dust2B178947%0.00
anubisC167944%0.00
ancientA138562%0.00
infernoA127558%-0.01
trainS86275%-0.01
nukeB63350%-0.00
vertigo21150%-0.07
overpass1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

73Matches
53%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
68.6ADR
62%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2343%1.0612.9
Ancient1867%1.0514.3
Anubis1050%1.0114.4
Inferno1070%0.9212.3
Dust2667%0.7812.5
Vertigo40%0.5910.3
Nuke1100%2.8317.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.6%Headshot accuracy
30.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.2%Spray accuracy
86.0%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
664msReaction time
35.3%T opening success
59.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
10.7%Flash assists
5.75HE damage / grenade
6.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.3004% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–11-0.0228%6 May
dust213–11-0.0418%21 Feb
overpass3–13-0.0519%27 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0123%27 Sept
nuke13–90.0220%27 Sept
vertigo13–9-0.0531%25 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0426%25 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0228%25 Sept
dust213–00.0426%3 Aug
mirage13–100.0221%30 May
inferno13–60.0043%30 May
train13–9-0.0132%30 May
ancient10–13-0.0215%29 May
ancient13–10.0625%29 May
train13–100.0130%29 May
train10–110.0531%28 May
dust25–13-0.0426%28 May
anubis8–130.0534%27 May
ancient13–9-0.0823%27 May
train13–9-0.0228%27 May
dust211–13-0.0422%27 May
train13–9-0.0426%27 May
mirage15–150.0030%26 May
nuke8–130.0035%26 May
dust210–130.0320%23 May
anubis13–80.0229%23 May
inferno15–15-0.0226%23 May
ancient11–3-0.0517%22 May
mirage10–130.0029%22 May
anubis16–120.0932%22 May
dust210–13-0.0752%22 May
anubis10–13-0.0636%22 May
ancient13–10.1252%22 May
nuke13–8-0.0038%21 May
train10–13-0.0419%21 May
dust213–30.0119%21 May
anubis13–20.0229%18 May
inferno6–13-0.0528%15 May
anubis10–13-0.0032%14 May
mirage13–20.0828%14 May
dust215–150.0029%14 May
mirage11–130.0123%14 May
dust213–11-0.0421%14 May
inferno11–13-0.0336%7 Mar
anubis1–13-0.1118%1 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0415%27 Feb
mirage13–110.0115%27 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0023%27 Feb
ancient13–10.0624%24 Feb
anubis4–13-0.096%21 Feb
vertigo7–13-0.0820%21 Feb
train13–7-0.0412%21 Feb
inferno13–40.0223%21 Feb
dust213–100.0424%20 Feb
dust213–30.1519%20 Feb
anubis14–160.0919%20 Feb
anubis13–40.0224%20 Feb
anubis13–3-0.0023%18 Feb
mirage13–40.0227%18 Feb
ancient11–130.0030%17 Feb
ancient13–16-0.0130%15 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0148%14 Feb
nuke13–20.0415%14 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0225%13 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0012%13 Feb
dust213–90.0123%13 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0221%13 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0631%11 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0023%11 Feb
mirage13–10.0218%11 Feb
mirage16–13-0.0423%9 Feb
ancient13–7-0.0228%9 Feb
ancient8–130.0230%7 Feb
ancient3–13-0.0624%7 Feb
mirage13–80.0236%6 Feb
anubis11–130.0523%6 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0415%6 Feb
mirage10–130.0422%4 Feb
train13–90.0222%4 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0228%3 Jan
inferno13–3-0.0313%3 Jan
dust27–130.0225%3 Jan
dust213–8-0.0520%2 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0034%2 Jan
inferno9–130.0126%2 Jan
dust23–13-0.0124%2 Jan
anubis13–40.0724%2 Jan
mirage13–70.0920%2 Jan
mirage3–00.2362%1 Jan
inferno13–10.0315%1 Jan
nuke5–13-0.084%1 Jan
inferno12–16-0.0228%30 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0325%30 Dec
anubis16–12-0.0031%30 Dec
mirage13–40.0818%30 Dec
nuke15–150.0329%30 Dec
ancient13–110.0127%8 Dec
dust211–13-0.0026%8 Dec
dust24–130.0121%8 Dec
anubis11–13-0.0040%4 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →