Wallbaber

Wallbaber — CS2 Stats

FI76561198995589974[U:1:1035324246]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

448Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,667Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13961 of 47553 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWallbaberFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER21,667 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning40
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60355Last 10060%Win rateLLTWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression5.5
Utility4.7
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.0
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time556ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — mirage 13–3
130Biggest win — nuke
9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 17ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2113862%0.00
infernoS1712571%0.00
dust2B158753%-0.00
cacheA159660%0.03
nukeS1410471%0.03
anubisA116555%-0.01
ancientD72529%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

52Matches
48%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
84.4ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2100%1.4418.0
Dust21100%1.0016.0
Ancient10%0.5610.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
548msReaction time
37.3%T opening success
41.7%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
10.1%Flash assists
9.32HE damage / grenade
5.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4467 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.2729% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0111%29 Aug
mirage6–13-0.1017%28 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0120%25 Aug
dust213–10-0.0117%25 Aug
anubis16–140.0117%25 Aug
nuke13–60.0014%25 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0419%24 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0613%24 Aug
dust23–13-0.0523%23 Aug
dust213–110.0121%21 Aug
dust24–13-0.0712%21 Aug
inferno13–110.0328%20 Aug
dust213–60.0215%20 Aug
cache13–80.0720%19 Aug
dust213–10-0.0133%19 Aug
anubis9–130.0215%18 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0334%18 Aug
inferno13–80.0425%17 Aug
inferno16–130.0023%16 Aug
cache13–80.0525%16 Aug
mirage13–70.0235%15 Aug
nuke13–90.0214%15 Aug
cache8–130.0029%15 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0318%14 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0915%14 Aug
inferno10–130.0118%13 Aug
cache13–5-0.0132%13 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0410%13 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0416%12 Aug
cache8–130.0121%12 Aug
nuke13–70.0130%11 Aug
dust213–11-0.0120%11 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0412%11 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0920%11 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0118%10 Aug
dust213–80.0119%10 Aug
inferno16–140.0525%9 Aug
dust215–150.0514%9 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0328%8 Aug
cache13–10-0.0212%6 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0118%5 Aug
ancient8–130.0018%5 Aug
mirage13–30.0223%5 Aug
dust213–6-0.0112%5 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0011%4 Aug
mirage13–50.0418%4 Aug
cache13–70.0719%4 Aug
nuke13–80.0417%4 Aug
anubis13–20.0114%4 Aug
dust28–13-0.0312%3 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0615%2 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0218%2 Aug
cache15–150.0324%2 Aug
anubis13–11-0.072%1 Aug
cache0–13-0.0322%1 Aug
cache13–6-0.0123%1 Aug
ancient13–40.0429%1 Aug
anubis13–60.0517%1 Aug
anubis13–30.0422%1 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0222%1 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0023%31 Jul
cache6–13-0.0216%31 Jul
mirage13–100.0226%30 Jul
inferno13–40.0534%30 Jul
mirage13–110.0829%29 Jul
cache16–130.0126%29 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0728%29 Jul
mirage13–30.1820%29 Jul
inferno11–80.1114%29 Jul
cache13–60.0129%28 Jul
ancient13–40.0816%28 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0721%28 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0018%27 Jul
inferno13–80.0418%27 Jul
nuke11–130.0115%27 Jul
dust214–160.0028%26 Jul
inferno13–40.0230%26 Jul
nuke4–130.0317%25 Jul
mirage13–10.0316%25 Jul
nuke13–00.0737%25 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0316%25 Jul
dust28–130.0322%24 Jul
cache13–10.1421%22 Jul
nuke13–30.0520%21 Jul
anubis13–30.0418%21 Jul
dust211–130.0221%21 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0110%20 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0422%20 Jul
dust213–80.0316%19 Jul
nuke13–90.0316%19 Jul
mirage3–13-0.094%19 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0224%18 Jul
nuke13–50.1729%17 Jul
inferno3–130.0119%15 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0119%14 Jul
cache12–160.0816%13 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0128%11 Jul
mirage12–120.0624%11 Jul
nuke13–30.0327%11 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0322%2 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →