Pati ♥

Pati ♥ — CS2 Stats

DE76561198985142233[U:1:1024876505]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,347Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,614Hours in CS34Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating10,000Blue band · top ~54.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,044 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+665Premier CS Rating · 9,335 → 10,000

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,000 +1,970 20 Sept – 13 Oct · 19 days played
6,07610,000peak 10,00020 Sept13 Oct
10,101Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,044Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
18Days played since 2026-09-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,044
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 7 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-20
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-20

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 10,000
  • +1,970 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches141——
Win rate38%——
K/D0.77——
Headshot %38%——

Measured 13 Sep 2026 → 13 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,998), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate34.7%42.7%43.7%9.1% short
Shot accuracy18.1%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.760.991.020.25 short
Match win rate38.0%43.9%44.7%6.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPati ♥FACEITLevel 4 · 1,044 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER10,000 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,044csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning50
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–56–4Last 10040%Win rateLWWWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.8pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility5.8
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning5.0
Utility5.8
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time657ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 657ms
Headshot accuracy14.3%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–8 · ancient, 27 Sept →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · nuke, 27 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · dust2, 30 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · inferno, 5 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
14–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 56% over 9nukeWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD248–1633%-0.03
dust2C187–1139%-0.03
cacheB178–947%-0.02
mirageC146–843%-0.02
nukeD123–925%-0.04
anubisA95–456%-0.02
ancient—41–325%0.00
debris—11–0100%0.09
vertigo—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

94,479Lifetime kills
0.76K/D
6,654Matches
38.0%Match win rate
34.7%Headshot %
18.1%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 4 players
9,547MVPs
2,530Hours (in match)
6,520Bombs planted
1,271Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,520
MP714,608
P2503,591
P902,542
AWP2,154
SG 5532,060

Lifetime map wins

18,016inferno
7,337dust2
4,530nuke
1,346vertigo
1,161train
873cbble
216office
126lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches
55%Win rate
0.77Avg K/D
66.3ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2862%0.8113.3
Vertigo475%0.7911.5
Anubis333%0.7413.3
Nuke333%0.8415.3
Cache2100%0.599.5
Mirage20%0.426.5
Ancient1100%0.8828.0
Inferno1100%0.9313.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.0%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
72.7%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
644msReaction time
58.3%T opening success
39.5%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
12.90HE damage / grenade
7.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.0322% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.5233% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–13-0.0710%13 Oct →
dust213–70.0220%13 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.077%13 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0914%13 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0731%11 Oct →
dust213–110.0616%11 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0318%11 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0917%10 Oct →
anubis13–110.0411%10 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0315%10 Oct →
inferno5–130.0210%10 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0512%10 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.048%10 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0411%10 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0911%9 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0014%9 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0518%7 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0315%7 Oct →
dust28–13-0.088%7 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0521%7 Oct →
cache11–13-0.058%7 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0315%6 Oct →
anubis13–100.0310%6 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0321%6 Oct →
inferno13–100.0421%6 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.056%6 Oct →
mirage13–110.0117%5 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0719%5 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0714%5 Oct →
inferno13–30.0319%5 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.0314%5 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0013%5 Oct →
cache13–80.0311%5 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0616%5 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.046%1 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0119%1 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0013%1 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0617%1 Oct →
cache16–14-0.038%30 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0610%30 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0216%30 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0124%29 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0712%29 Sept →
inferno11–130.0012%29 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0417%29 Sept →
cache15–15-0.018%29 Sept →
mirage13–110.0512%28 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0926%27 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0915%27 Sept →
cache13–50.0120%27 Sept →
mirage13–30.0719%27 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0631%27 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0114%27 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.019%27 Sept →
dust215–15-0.029%27 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0110%27 Sept →
cache13–90.0415%27 Sept →
nuke9–130.0219%27 Sept →
dust213–100.0114%27 Sept →
ancient13–80.1215%27 Sept →
dust24–13-0.085%26 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0710%26 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0414%26 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0926%26 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0917%26 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.027%26 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0518%26 Sept →
dust213–90.0619%26 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.059%26 Sept →
nuke13–80.0315%26 Sept →
cache5–130.0111%26 Sept →
dust215–150.0626%26 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0119%25 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.076%25 Sept →
dust25–13-0.065%25 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0516%25 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0118%25 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0220%25 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.047%25 Sept →
debris9–70.0920%25 Sept →
inferno0–9-0.1819%25 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.017%25 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0311%25 Sept →
mirage13–110.0011%25 Sept →
cache11–13-0.049%25 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.069%24 Sept →
inferno15–150.0213%24 Sept →
inferno16–120.0125%23 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.029%23 Sept →
mirage10–130.0223%23 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0011%23 Sept →
inferno13–40.0313%22 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0611%22 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0511%22 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0811%22 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0312%22 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.017%21 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0614%21 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.057%21 Sept →
vertigo13–5-0.0111%21 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.