@taknvdo

@taknvdo — CS2 Stats

KP76561198983845367[U:1:1023579639]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

850Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,937Hours in CS54Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,017Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#50013 of 226615 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,554 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 850 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 4 Sep 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,017 +1,591 14 Sept16 Sept · 15 days played
17,55824,945peak 24,94514 Sept16 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,554Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2025-09-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,554
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 197 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-16
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,928 below peak (24,945)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,983 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-16
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,115), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate44.9%46.8%48.3%3.4% short
Shot accuracy15.9%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.961.061.070.11 short
Match win rate46.4%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG@taknvdoFACEITLevel 8 · 1,554 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,017 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,554csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning41
Utility12

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49492Last 10049%Win rateLWWLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · +123ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 465ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility1.2
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.1
Utility1.2
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time515ms−100ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 515ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%−5.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–11 · nuke, 14 Feb
44%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · nuke, 30 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · anubis, 7 Sept
13–3Biggest win · dust2, 31 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 17ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A31181358%-0.01
mirageC1871139%-0.01
infernoS1711665%-0.01
nukeD103730%0.00
cacheC83538%-0.02
ancientD82625%-0.03
anubisA53260%-0.03
overpass21150%-0.00
vertigo110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

93,993Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
3,332Matches
46.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
44.9%Headshot %
15.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
8,857MVPs
3,876Hours (in match)
3,165Bombs planted
954Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,572
AWP14,142
FAMAS4,292
SG 5532,402
Knife1,987

Lifetime map wins

9,304dust2
7,663inferno
2,637train
1,401nuke
484vertigo
18lake
14italy
5office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,090Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
74.8ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust212248%1.0114.9
Mirage11546%0.9715.4
Anubis8552%1.1614.7
Inferno5256%1.0515.9
Ancient2544%0.8714.0
Nuke1937%1.0915.8
Overpass1861%0.9615.1
Train1136%0.8111.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
540msReaction time
30.6%T opening success
28.4%CT opening success
0.32Enemies flashed / flash
0.2%Flash assists
3.90HE damage / grenade
2.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3183 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.5848% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage2–13-0.098%13 Sept
mirage16–12-0.0115%13 Sept
anubis13–8-0.0418%7 Sept
dust25–13-0.0510%6 Sept
dust26–13-0.0215%5 Sept
mirage8–130.0517%5 Sept
cache13–60.0310%5 Sept
dust213–6-0.0112%3 Sept
cache9–13-0.0319%3 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0212%2 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0712%2 Sept
inferno16–13-0.0310%2 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0319%2 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0522%2 Sept
cache9–13-0.0514%1 Sept
nuke0–20.000%1 Sept
cache13–5-0.120%1 Sept
mirage3–13-0.087%1 Sept
inferno13–110.0230%1 Sept
dust26–13-0.110%1 Sept
cache11–13-0.0117%1 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0618%1 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0625%1 Sept
dust21–13-0.078%1 Sept
dust213–80.0430%1 Sept
dust213–6-0.0012%31 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0835%31 Aug
inferno13–6-0.066%31 Aug
cache4–13-0.0229%31 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0114%31 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0118%31 Aug
dust26–13-0.0214%31 Aug
dust213–6-0.0127%31 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0119%31 Aug
dust213–60.0314%31 Aug
dust213–3-0.0525%31 Aug
anubis6–13-0.1115%31 Aug
ancient2–13-0.1210%30 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0344%30 Aug
mirage13–9-0.039%30 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0710%30 Aug
cache13–50.035%29 Aug
dust216–14-0.0512%29 Aug
inferno13–60.0424%29 Aug
cache7–130.0123%1 May
inferno13–70.0714%24 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0114%3 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0418%2 Apr
dust215–15-0.0018%1 Apr
dust213–4-0.0213%15 Mar
dust213–30.0916%27 Feb
mirage13–60.0722%26 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0227%25 Feb
anubis13–100.0312%24 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0418%24 Feb
dust27–13-0.0915%24 Feb
dust210–130.0129%24 Feb
dust211–130.0118%24 Feb
mirage13–70.0021%21 Feb
dust213–110.0212%21 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0421%16 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0219%15 Feb
dust213–70.0718%15 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0129%15 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0615%15 Feb
nuke13–4-0.0215%15 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0121%15 Feb
ancient13–70.0217%15 Feb
anubis13–100.0115%15 Feb
dust213–7-0.0614%15 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0430%15 Feb
dust28–13-0.0124%15 Feb
dust29–13-0.0121%15 Feb
inferno13–100.0516%15 Feb
dust213–110.0126%14 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0417%14 Feb
dust215–15-0.0520%14 Feb
nuke13–110.1226%14 Feb
nuke10–130.0229%13 Feb
vertigo13–60.0016%13 Feb
inferno13–100.0922%13 Feb
dust213–5-0.0028%13 Feb
mirage7–130.0231%12 Feb
mirage13–90.0315%11 Feb
mirage13–160.0122%30 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0019%30 Dec
ancient3–130.0127%30 Dec
dust213–50.0727%15 Sept
overpass10–13-0.0114%14 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0721%14 Sept
nuke13–40.0320%14 Sept
dust213–90.0227%14 Sept
mirage13–50.0813%14 Sept
dust213–70.0216%14 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0222%14 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0612%14 Sept
dust213–40.0523%14 Sept
overpass13–40.0013%14 Sept
inferno10–130.0114%5 Sept
dust212–160.0228%4 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →