endru

endru — CS2 Stats

FO76561198977948350[U:1:1017682622]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,655Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating27,869Top 5% of 215,248 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3376 of 261491 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 27,869 → 27,869
+13Tracked matches · now 2,655
−3.3ppWin rate · 66.7% → 63.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,869 +1,217 8 Jan – 2 Nov · 22 days played
23,76327,869peak 27,8698 Jan2 Nov
Faceit ELO: 2,785 +0 2 Sept – 11 Sept · 2 observations
2,7852,785peak 2,7852 Sept11 Sept
27,869Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,785Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
57Days played since 2026-01-08

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 27,869
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,131 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-11-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-11-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGendruFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER27,869 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,785csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning61
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–42Last 10058%Win rateLWWWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · +36ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.3
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.1
Utility5.3
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time513ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 513ms
Headshot accuracy24.2%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 24 Feb →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · dust2, 22 Feb →
297msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 26 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 25 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 90% over 10ancientWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3015–1550%0.02
dust2S2315–865%0.02
anubisB168–850%0.03
infernoS109–190%0.03
nukeC94–544%0.04
ancientC83–538%0.00
cache—22–0100%0.06
eldorado—11–0100%0.03
overpass—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,838Matches
52%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
81.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage36453%1.0916.0
Anubis23951%1.1316.3
Ancient20546%0.9915.3
Dust218652%1.0615.7
Inferno8947%1.0916.2
Vertigo5654%1.1217.0
Nuke4542%1.0416.7
Overpass2654%0.9314.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
75.6%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
502msReaction time
57.7%T opening success
53.3%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
7.27HE damage / grenade
11.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4692 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–130.0022%12 Nov →
mirage13–5-0.0119%28 Oct →
nuke13–90.0622%28 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0420%27 Oct →
inferno13–40.0134%27 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0922%25 Oct →
mirage13–80.0239%25 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0227%25 Oct →
eldorado9–60.0324%25 Oct →
dust213–110.0127%12 Oct →
mirage11–130.0338%12 Oct →
dust213–110.0331%11 Oct →
cache13–80.0135%11 Oct →
anubis11–130.0013%2 Oct →
anubis8–130.0220%26 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0421%24 Sept →
mirage13–40.0728%18 Sept →
dust213–50.0422%14 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0421%14 Sept →
anubis3–130.0537%9 Sept →
dust216–140.0627%26 Aug →
dust213–50.0225%26 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0117%26 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0118%20 Aug →
dust213–30.0323%20 Aug →
ancient8–130.0021%18 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0020%17 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0425%11 Aug →
cache5–10.1029%11 Aug →
inferno13–30.0815%9 Aug →
mirage13–60.0815%9 Aug →
dust213–80.0128%9 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0514%9 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0123%8 Aug →
mirage10–130.0224%14 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0416%10 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0527%8 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0226%8 Jul →
dust213–80.0117%5 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0216%4 Jul →
anubis13–110.0326%7 Jun →
dust214–160.0227%14 May →
inferno13–30.0714%3 May →
inferno13–30.0526%26 Apr →
anubis13–6-0.0113%21 Apr →
inferno13–60.0524%6 Apr →
mirage13–70.1214%5 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0416%2 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.0114%19 Mar →
dust211–130.0527%13 Mar →
dust213–80.1426%12 Mar →
anubis10–13-0.0319%5 Mar →
inferno13–8-0.0217%3 Mar →
nuke11–130.0324%28 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0425%25 Feb →
mirage13–20.0725%25 Feb →
ancient13–10.1222%25 Feb →
nuke13–60.0423%24 Feb →
dust213–110.0518%24 Feb →
mirage13–30.1835%24 Feb →
anubis5–13-0.0224%22 Feb →
dust23–130.0440%22 Feb →
ancient13–7-0.0416%22 Feb →
nuke13–60.0815%22 Feb →
mirage13–80.0422%20 Feb →
anubis13–6-0.0412%20 Feb →
nuke8–130.0125%20 Feb →
anubis13–70.0811%20 Feb →
mirage7–130.0322%20 Feb →
mirage13–60.0425%20 Feb →
mirage13–30.0517%19 Feb →
anubis13–60.0620%19 Feb →
inferno9–10.0430%19 Feb →
mirage14–160.0518%19 Feb →
mirage13–110.0817%17 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0219%17 Feb →
mirage10–130.0131%13 Feb →
dust213–30.0126%13 Feb →
mirage13–90.0821%12 Feb →
anubis13–70.1424%12 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0327%11 Feb →
inferno13–60.0926%11 Feb →
overpass13–20.0512%11 Feb →
dust213–160.0620%11 Feb →
mirage4–130.0118%10 Feb →
nuke7–130.0822%10 Feb →
ancient8–130.029%10 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.039%6 Feb →
ancient13–6-0.0120%5 Feb →
anubis13–30.1428%5 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.0415%3 Feb →
anubis11–130.0428%3 Feb →
dust216–140.0123%29 Jan →
ancient7–13-0.038%29 Jan →
anubis13–60.0127%28 Jan →
nuke16–140.1024%15 Jan →
mirage8–130.0222%15 Jan →
dust28–13-0.0218%10 Jan →
inferno12–16-0.0018%9 Jan →
inferno13–11-0.0615%8 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.