Senfam & Eva

Senfam & Eva — CS2 Stats

DE76561198975153880[U:1:1014888152]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

675Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.4 LearningClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (62 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+9Tracked matches · now 675
−14.3ppWin rate · 50.0% → 35.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,931 +5,468 9 Jun – 22 Jul · 13 days played
12,46318,923peak 18,9239 Jun22 Jul
19,103Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-06-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSenfam & EvaFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning30
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateWLLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +6.6pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Last 10

  • 1–9 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 6–13–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+5.6 against its own average).

Aim4.7
Utility2.9
Positioning3.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch9.4

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning3.0
Utility2.9
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact0.2

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time626ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy12.9%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 12.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–7 · cache, 9 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–5 · inferno, 14 Oct →
383msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 10 Jun →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 12 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 68% over 25anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS2517–868%-0.01
infernoB2312–1152%-0.03
dust2B2211–1150%-0.03
anubisD51–420%-0.02
office—42–250%0.01
ancient—42–250%-0.01
mirage—31–233%0.03
overpass—31–233%-0.02
train—20–20%-0.04
vertigo—21–150%-0.00
nuke—21–150%-0.00
warden—20–20%-0.08
boulder—10–10%-0.06
fachwerk—10–10%-0.06
shelter—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

18Matches
67%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
78.1ADR
27%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

67%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2100%1.3811.5
Inferno2100%1.0815.0
Anubis1100%2.0018.0
Train10%0.5910.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.1%Headshot accuracy
30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.8%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
621msReaction time
19.3%T opening success
30.8%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
10.78HE damage / grenade
1.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.14% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3875 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.3288% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–8-0.0327%20 Oct →
dust20–13-0.068%20 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0615%19 Oct →
inferno0–50.0250%14 Oct →
dust22–13-0.1114%14 Oct →
train6–13-0.0219%8 Oct →
office8–130.0524%22 Sept →
inferno8–130.027%15 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.0513%14 Sept →
cache14–16-0.023%21 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0919%21 Aug →
dust211–13-0.029%17 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.052%25 Jul →
cache13–7-0.089%25 Jul →
dust213–11-0.027%23 Jul →
anubis12–12-0.0113%23 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0311%22 Jul →
vertigo13–80.0418%22 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0310%22 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0214%22 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0610%21 Jul →
cache6–130.0332%21 Jul →
dust211–13-0.063%20 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0015%20 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.106%14 Jul →
office13–70.016%14 Jul →
cache13–80.0613%14 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0511%13 Jul →
dust211–13-0.088%13 Jul →
office12–12-0.025%13 Jul →
boulder6–13-0.067%13 Jul →
fachwerk3–13-0.065%13 Jul →
shelter13–9-0.0213%13 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0113%12 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0214%12 Jul →
ancient13–20.0014%12 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0511%9 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0624%9 Jul →
inferno16–13-0.0221%9 Jul →
cache13–70.1012%9 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0713%9 Jul →
anubis13–30.044%9 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.040%9 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.030%9 Jul →
cache13–70.0710%9 Jul →
cache16–12-0.018%9 Jul →
mirage4–130.0920%9 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0513%9 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0415%8 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0316%8 Jul →
cache9–130.007%7 Jul →
dust213–70.1013%7 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.048%7 Jul →
dust213–70.089%7 Jul →
cache13–60.0110%7 Jul →
cache13–60.0119%7 Jul →
inferno13–4-0.035%7 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0613%7 Jul →
cache13–90.0114%7 Jul →
cache13–8-0.066%7 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0025%6 Jul →
dust213–30.1010%6 Jul →
cache8–13-0.033%6 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0414%6 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0116%28 Jun →
cache13–50.0211%27 Jun →
office4–30.0229%27 Jun →
dust213–7-0.0312%26 Jun →
mirage3–110.0113%23 Jun →
inferno12–16-0.0013%23 Jun →
cache13–6-0.0418%22 Jun →
train8–13-0.0514%22 Jun →
dust213–4-0.0911%22 Jun →
dust213–40.0019%22 Jun →
warden2–13-0.1215%21 Jun →
inferno1–7-0.040%21 Jun →
cache13–11-0.0310%21 Jun →
cache5–13-0.0713%21 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0422%21 Jun →
inferno3–9-0.1640%21 Jun →
warden10–13-0.0526%21 Jun →
cache13–70.046%16 Jun →
inferno16–130.0220%15 Jun →
ancient13–100.0015%15 Jun →
cache13–10-0.0110%14 Jun →
overpass7–13-0.0416%11 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0319%11 Jun →
cache13–110.0324%10 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0720%10 Jun →
inferno16–14-0.039%10 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0317%10 Jun →
overpass10–13-0.0017%10 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0314%10 Jun →
overpass16–14-0.028%10 Jun →
nuke4–00.030%10 Jun →
inferno13–80.0517%10 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0214%10 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.115%10 Jun →
ancient15–150.0313%9 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0517%9 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.