M.Wade

M.Wade — CS2 Stats

AU76561198975116349[U:1:1014850621]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,237Tracked matches55%Win rate2025Tracked since
2,237Hours in CS90Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,282Purple band · top ~27.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,000 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+282Premier CS Rating · 15,000 → 15,282
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 18 days played since 31 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,282 -46 31 Aug17 Sept · 16 days played
14,88516,081peak 16,08131 Aug17 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,000 +0 8 Sept17 Sept · 3 observations
1,0001,000peak 1,0008 Sept17 Sept
16,384Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,000Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
18Days played since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,000
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 51 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-08
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 799 below peak (16,081)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,718 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches48
Win rate44%
K/D0.88
Headshot %34%

Measured 8 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate37.5%43.8%44.9%7.3% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.951.021.040.09 short
Match win rate48.4%44.7%45.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGM.WadeFACEITLevel 5 · 1,000 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,282 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,000csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning59
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50437Last 10050%Win rateWLWWLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +2.1pp headshot accuracy · +4ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility5.0
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch2.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.9
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time567ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 567ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy12.4%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 12.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–1 · train, 15 Sept
31%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · office, 16 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 2–3 · dust2, 9 Sept
13–1Biggest win · train, 15 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 84% over 19dust2Weakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS1916384%0.03
infernoD1861233%0.00
anubisB137654%0.01
dust2D1331023%-0.03
ancientB137654%0.03
mirageB105550%0.04
cacheC94544%0.01
office31233%0.03
train110100%0.17
vertigo1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,559Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
2,355Matches
48.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
37.5%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
4,890MVPs
1,063Hours (in match)
4,672Bombs planted
608Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,019dust2
3,618nuke
3,457inferno
769train
307vertigo
186office
21assault
6italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

80Matches
46%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
78.6ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1631%0.9315.1
Nuke1540%0.9815.5
Dust21173%0.9715.4
Inferno1173%1.3116.6
Ancient922%0.8713.9
Anubis850%0.9816.3
Cache425%0.7010.8
Overpass367%0.7713.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.7%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
566msReaction time
35.2%T opening success
55.6%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
5.47HE damage / grenade
12.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.6505% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4739 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.1881% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–110.0312%17 Sept
inferno5–130.038%16 Sept
nuke13–30.0814%16 Sept
cache13–7-0.019%16 Sept
dust211–130.0314%16 Sept
inferno13–70.0715%16 Sept
office3–13-0.0231%16 Sept
anubis13–80.1620%16 Sept
ancient5–130.0614%15 Sept
nuke13–100.059%15 Sept
cache10–13-0.0313%15 Sept
train13–10.1713%15 Sept
nuke13–80.0113%15 Sept
ancient15–15-0.0111%14 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0112%14 Sept
mirage4–130.019%14 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0112%14 Sept
nuke13–4-0.016%14 Sept
inferno13–60.0219%14 Sept
cache8–13-0.0516%14 Sept
inferno11–130.0114%14 Sept
cache13–80.029%13 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0311%13 Sept
vertigo11–13-0.0915%13 Sept
anubis4–13-0.038%13 Sept
inferno13–70.068%13 Sept
anubis16–120.0312%13 Sept
dust210–13-0.074%12 Sept
mirage13–160.0418%12 Sept
anubis13–110.0412%12 Sept
nuke13–50.0110%12 Sept
dust211–130.0614%12 Sept
dust25–13-0.073%11 Sept
ancient6–130.085%11 Sept
dust213–10-0.027%11 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0422%10 Sept
inferno13–7-0.056%10 Sept
ancient13–20.0312%10 Sept
inferno2–13-0.110%10 Sept
dust22–3-0.150%9 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0621%9 Sept
ancient4–13-0.080%9 Sept
dust28–13-0.0913%9 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0212%9 Sept
ancient12–40.096%9 Sept
anubis15–15-0.049%9 Sept
mirage16–140.1015%8 Sept
inferno8–13-0.087%8 Sept
ancient3–13-0.048%8 Sept
mirage13–40.048%8 Sept
nuke13–70.0020%8 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0011%8 Sept
inferno9–130.016%7 Sept
mirage13–100.0313%7 Sept
nuke15–150.049%7 Sept
anubis13–50.1123%7 Sept
dust214–16-0.032%7 Sept
nuke13–90.0710%7 Sept
mirage15–15-0.037%7 Sept
dust29–13-0.0013%7 Sept
nuke11–13-0.052%6 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0115%6 Sept
nuke13–80.0119%6 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0319%6 Sept
anubis15–150.0112%6 Sept
nuke13–20.0510%6 Sept
ancient13–80.108%6 Sept
cache5–13-0.0112%6 Sept
cache13–70.0612%6 Sept
nuke13–110.0611%6 Sept
mirage13–90.1410%6 Sept
cache13–16-0.0210%6 Sept
dust210–13-0.0311%6 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0414%6 Sept
ancient12–120.1614%6 Sept
cache13–40.0914%5 Sept
inferno13–70.0813%5 Sept
mirage13–80.0517%5 Sept
inferno4–90.1012%5 Sept
nuke9–30.1015%5 Sept
inferno9–5-0.0516%5 Sept
dust213–4-0.0310%4 Sept
inferno6–130.0219%3 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0217%3 Sept
cache9–130.0430%3 Sept
inferno3–130.0114%3 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0315%3 Sept
inferno8–13-0.059%2 Sept
inferno8–13-0.016%2 Sept
nuke13–20.0118%2 Sept
office8–13-0.079%2 Sept
anubis9–130.005%2 Sept
office13–90.1717%2 Sept
nuke13–100.0414%2 Sept
ancient13–70.0519%2 Sept
dust213–90.029%1 Sept
nuke13–20.1626%1 Sept
mirage15–150.069%1 Sept
dust28–130.0117%1 Sept
ancient13–70.0413%31 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →