Teet

Teet — CS2 Stats

US76561198974459010[U:1:1014193282]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

644Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
972Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating6,089Light Blue band · top ~73.6% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 644 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 5 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 6,089 -1,228 5 Jul18 Sept · 34 days played
5,4899,808peak 9,8085 Jul18 Sept
9,808Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-07-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,719 below peak (9,808)
  • -2,142 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 3,911 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,217), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate45.6%39.9%41.9%above
Shot accuracy10.0%6.9%9.6%above
Kill/death ratio0.810.920.980.17 short
Match win rate39.8%42.3%43.8%4.0% short

This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTeetPREMIER6,089 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning54
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45523Last 10045%Win rateWLWWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · +16ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 653ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility6.0
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.4
Utility6.0
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time624ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 26 Aug
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · anubis, 28 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · mirage, 12 Aug
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 10 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8ancientWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B22111150%-0.02
mirageB189950%-0.02
ancientD1441029%-0.03
nukeA148657%0.01
cacheD134931%-0.04
infernoD103730%-0.04
anubisS86275%-0.00
shelter1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

18,571Lifetime kills
0.81K/D
1,424Matches
39.8%Match win rate
45.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Light Blue band
10.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Light Blue band
1,686MVPs
505Hours (in match)
785Bombs planted
205Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,047dust2
1,435inferno
1,270nuke
596vertigo
93office
77lake
69train
26safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1Matches
0%Win rate
0.23Avg K/D
ADR
100%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.1%Spray accuracy
67.4%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
617msReaction time
36.6%T opening success
43.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
11.44HE damage / grenade
8.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.6145% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–70.0218%12 Sept
ancient10–130.0133%7 Sept
anubis13–4-0.0325%7 Sept
dust213–10-0.0519%7 Sept
nuke10–130.0138%6 Sept
dust213–11-0.0417%6 Sept
mirage9–130.0626%5 Sept
cache0–10-0.0617%5 Sept
dust29–13-0.0322%5 Sept
inferno0–13-0.1220%28 Aug
anubis13–20.0443%28 Aug
dust213–30.1218%26 Aug
cache11–13-0.0217%24 Aug
dust26–13-0.0640%23 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0819%23 Aug
ancient9–130.0317%22 Aug
nuke13–110.045%22 Aug
ancient3–13-0.1019%22 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0210%22 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0024%22 Aug
ancient10–13-0.015%20 Aug
dust24–13-0.1016%19 Aug
dust23–13-0.0225%18 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0528%18 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0116%18 Aug
nuke10–130.0715%17 Aug
cache13–6-0.0135%16 Aug
dust213–90.0822%16 Aug
anubis2–9-0.1012%16 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0232%16 Aug
nuke9–7-0.140%15 Aug
anubis13–90.0210%15 Aug
mirage11–13-0.039%15 Aug
dust213–6-0.0218%13 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0415%12 Aug
cache3–13-0.057%12 Aug
mirage2–130.0117%12 Aug
nuke13–90.0529%10 Aug
mirage5–13-0.1214%9 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0623%9 Aug
mirage13–100.0124%9 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0215%9 Aug
cache9–13-0.0642%9 Aug
inferno9–130.0536%8 Aug
dust213–6-0.0414%8 Aug
anubis13–110.0021%8 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0329%8 Aug
mirage13–60.0322%8 Aug
anubis13–110.0133%6 Aug
dust216–12-0.0213%4 Aug
cache6–13-0.0433%2 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0438%2 Aug
cache13–9-0.0415%1 Aug
dust25–13-0.0717%1 Aug
dust216–14-0.0712%1 Aug
cache13–11-0.0817%1 Aug
mirage13–50.030%1 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0322%1 Aug
cache9–13-0.0535%31 Jul
ancient4–130.0118%31 Jul
nuke10–130.0617%30 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0317%30 Jul
ancient13–100.0015%28 Jul
nuke13–40.0826%28 Jul
mirage13–30.0228%28 Jul
dust213–70.0712%27 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0712%26 Jul
dust215–15-0.0024%26 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0613%26 Jul
cache6–13-0.0423%26 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0212%26 Jul
nuke6–30.0419%25 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0520%25 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0117%25 Jul
dust213–16-0.0428%24 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0714%24 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0518%22 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0417%21 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0516%21 Jul
ancient13–110.0215%20 Jul
dust211–130.0019%20 Jul
dust29–130.0729%20 Jul
nuke14–160.0322%19 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0315%19 Jul
dust213–11-0.0416%18 Jul
cache9–13-0.0322%18 Jul
ancient11–13-0.1122%18 Jul
cache15–15-0.0123%18 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0818%18 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0521%12 Jul
shelter1–13-0.0740%11 Jul
dust210–13-0.0430%11 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0313%11 Jul
nuke13–10.0129%10 Jul
dust26–13-0.0430%10 Jul
cache13–6-0.0620%10 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0311%6 Jul
dust213–6-0.0314%6 Jul
nuke3–13-0.079%6 Jul
nuke16–120.0033%5 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →