Vettis

Vettis — CS2 Stats

76561198974253903[U:1:1013988175]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,731Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,852 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVettisFACEITLevel 9 · 1,852 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning28
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49456Last 10049%Win rateTLLTLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim5.5
Aggression0.8
Utility7.5
Positioning2.8
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.8

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 657ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning2.8
Utility7.5
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time656ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 699ms → last ⅓ avg 656ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — vertigo 9–2
132Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 36% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2281436%0.00
infernoB22111150%0.02
ancientC1661038%0.00
mirageA169756%-0.02
cacheC83538%-0.01
dust2S86275%-0.00
vertigo43175%0.12
overpass32167%0.01
anubis110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,418Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
70.2ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno26255%1.0314.2
Ancient25255%0.9914.1
Mirage18142%0.9313.6
Dust211648%0.9112.8
Nuke9444%0.9914.1
Vertigo9354%0.9714.5
Anubis6242%0.8512.9
Overpass3155%1.0815.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.2%Spray accuracy
73.2%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
657msReaction time
22.7%T opening success
30.5%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
16.78HE damage / grenade
14.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.7019% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache15–15-0.0224%6 Aug
ancient6–130.0121%6 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0423%2 Aug
nuke12–120.1110%2 Aug
cache6–13-0.0020%2 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0216%31 Jul
ancient13–110.0127%23 Jul
ancient5–130.1112%23 Jul
inferno8–130.0328%23 Jul
nuke5–130.0424%23 Jul
cache13–30.0821%21 Jul
nuke2–3-0.0325%21 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0019%21 Jul
inferno2–7-0.0020%19 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0230%19 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0431%19 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0327%18 Jul
dust213–90.0418%18 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0433%18 Jul
inferno9–130.0121%18 Jul
mirage19–17-0.018%17 Jul
mirage16–13-0.049%14 Jul
cache6–13-0.0313%10 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0521%10 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0016%10 Jul
nuke13–110.0114%10 Jul
inferno13–80.0429%3 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0010%3 Jul
cache13–9-0.0518%3 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0310%3 Jul
nuke13–70.1120%26 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0423%25 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0619%25 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0215%21 Jun
cache8–13-0.0411%21 Jun
inferno13–30.0714%12 Jun
ancient13–110.0516%9 Jun
cache12–12-0.0311%9 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0915%5 Jun
dust27–13-0.049%5 Jun
cache13–40.0321%29 May
nuke4–13-0.0914%1 May
vertigo9–40.1336%28 Apr
inferno14–160.078%28 Apr
nuke13–80.0828%28 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0419%24 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0220%24 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0110%14 Apr
vertigo9–20.2020%14 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0118%14 Apr
ancient13–50.0214%10 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0217%10 Apr
mirage13–70.0025%10 Apr
inferno16–14-0.0116%10 Apr
dust213–2-0.0023%10 Apr
dust22–13-0.0619%2 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0813%2 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0411%2 Apr
mirage9–130.0312%2 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0214%2 Apr
dust213–11-0.0116%2 Apr
mirage3–13-0.137%27 Mar
nuke13–90.079%24 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0021%21 Mar
inferno13–100.1138%16 Mar
inferno13–40.0520%16 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0133%13 Mar
nuke13–5-0.0117%13 Mar
mirage15–150.0421%7 Mar
dust213–8-0.0122%7 Mar
inferno13–90.0321%7 Mar
dust213–40.0432%7 Mar
nuke13–70.0119%7 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0535%7 Mar
vertigo8–80.0520%7 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0515%4 Mar
inferno12–16-0.049%26 Feb
overpass13–80.0620%26 Feb
mirage13–4-0.0019%16 Feb
nuke8–130.0020%16 Feb
overpass13–8-0.0114%16 Feb
ancient7–130.0217%16 Feb
mirage19–16-0.0212%10 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0214%31 Jan
nuke11–13-0.0119%28 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0310%28 Jan
dust213–7-0.0124%28 Jan
ancient13–100.038%28 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0121%28 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0211%25 Jan
nuke13–70.1030%25 Jan
inferno13–20.1431%25 Jan
nuke11–130.0214%25 Jan
inferno14–16-0.0416%25 Jan
ancient5–13-0.0211%24 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0714%20 Jan
inferno13–60.0523%20 Jan
ancient6–130.0230%20 Jan
vertigo13–60.0920%20 Jan
mirage1–13-0.0825%20 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →