؟؟↝𝕲𝓻𝙖𝙣𝙣𝔂 — CS2 Stats

YE76561198972527767[U:1:1012262039]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

760Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

2,571Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player

Premier CS Rating22,226Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#47695 of 226509 tracked

FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+635Premier CS Rating · 21,591 → 22,226

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 12 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,226 +4,715 27 Jul – 18 Sept · 24 days played

22,710Peak Premier in tracked matches

32Days played since 2026-07-12

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 22,226
+3,909 over 30 days · improving
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,774 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-05
Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

Metric	Last 7	Previous 7	Change
Matches	19	22	−3
Win rate	74%	45%	+28pp
K/D	1.21	1.13	+0.08
Headshot %	56%	53%	+4pp

Measured 12 Sep 2026 → 18 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,115), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	53.3%	46.8%	48.3%	above
Shot accuracy	17.2%	13.0%	13.2%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.21	1.06	1.07	above
Match win rate	46.3%	46.3%	46.9%	meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning59

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateLLWWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 525ms

Last 10

5–5 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 24%
Avg reaction 492ms

Last 20

14–6 · 70% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 25%
Avg reaction 516ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.8

Utility5.7

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels3.3

Clutch1.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning5.9

Utility5.7

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels3.4

Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time508ms−69ms

first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 508ms

Headshot accuracy24.1%−1.7%

first ⅓ avg 25.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–6 · anubis, 14 Sept →

60%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · nuke, 18 Aug →

391msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · office, 17 Sept →

13–0Biggest win · inferno, 27 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak

L2Current streak

8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 10mirageWeakest map · 44% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	S	18	13–5	72%	0.03
anubis	B	16	8–8	50%	0.04
mirage	C	16	7–9	44%	0.01
ancient	C	16	7–9	44%	0.02
nuke	B	11	5–6	45%	0.01
cache	S	10	8–2	80%	0.05
dust2	A	8	5–3	63%	0.05
office	—	2	1–1	50%	0.00
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

76,408Lifetime kills

1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players

3,127Matches

46.3%Match win rate

53.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players

17.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players

10,427MVPs

1,399Hours (in match)

2,390Bombs planted

758Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,750

Desert Eagle9,768

AWP9,574

M4A4 / M4A1-S7,689

P2000 / USP-S4,666

Glock-184,542

SSG 083,954

SG 5531,159

FAMAS1,088

AUG906

Lifetime map wins

8,263inferno

2,932train

2,357dust2

2,122vertigo

1,786nuke

300office

83lake

75cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

192Matches

57%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

88.5ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win

39%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	13	38%	1.14	15.9
Ancient	9	67%	1.13	20.0
Anubis	7	43%	1.19	20.0
Mirage	7	57%	1.14	15.4
Dust2	2	50%	1.16	15.0
Overpass	2	100%	1.18	17.0
Cache	1	100%	1.36	19.0
Nuke	1	100%	1.78	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.5%Headshot accuracy

38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.3%Spray accuracy

82.0%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

507msReaction time

25.0%T opening success

57.2%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

3.9%Flash assists

11.71HE damage / grenade

5.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 24.986% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	3–13	-0.01	17%	18 Sept →
nuke	7–13	0.01	28%	18 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.01	19%	18 Sept →
inferno	13–11	0.00	29%	18 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.05	21%	18 Sept →
office	11–13	0.00	25%	17 Sept →
mirage	13–11	0.01	25%	15 Sept →
anubis	13–4	0.01	15%	15 Sept →
nuke	8–13	0.04	28%	14 Sept →
ancient	2–13	-0.02	34%	14 Sept →
anubis	13–6	0.19	25%	14 Sept →
ancient	13–7	0.03	24%	14 Sept →
inferno	13–5	0.05	24%	14 Sept →
ancient	13–4	-0.03	13%	14 Sept →
cache	13–8	0.08	27%	14 Sept →
ancient	13–4	0.10	23%	14 Sept →
mirage	13–11	0.02	25%	13 Sept →
fachwerk	13–3	0.07	24%	11 Sept →
vertigo	3–13	-0.02	21%	11 Sept →
office	13–9	-0.00	43%	11 Sept →
inferno	13–7	0.02	26%	11 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.01	13%	11 Sept →
anubis	4–13	-0.01	17%	10 Sept →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	32%	10 Sept →
cache	3–13	0.04	20%	9 Sept →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	24%	9 Sept →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	14%	9 Sept →
cache	13–9	-0.03	11%	7 Sept →
cache	13–8	0.02	25%	7 Sept →
anubis	13–5	0.10	30%	7 Sept →
inferno	12–16	0.01	28%	7 Sept →
cache	13–4	-0.01	40%	7 Sept →
dust2	10–13	0.06	26%	7 Sept →
anubis	9–13	0.03	32%	7 Sept →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	50%	7 Sept →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	29%	4 Sept →
ancient	4–13	0.00	27%	4 Sept →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	26%	4 Sept →
inferno	13–7	0.05	38%	4 Sept →
dust2	13–5	0.12	19%	4 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.12	30%	3 Sept →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	17%	3 Sept →
nuke	13–6	0.07	24%	3 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.02	32%	2 Sept →
cache	13–5	0.11	19%	2 Sept →
inferno	16–13	0.10	27%	2 Sept →
anubis	11–13	0.02	17%	2 Sept →
mirage	12–16	-0.04	16%	2 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.03	15%	1 Sept →
cache	13–8	0.15	18%	31 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.06	13%	31 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.03	12%	31 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.06	13%	30 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.05	20%	30 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.04	19%	30 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.04	35%	30 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	24%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.04	20%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.09	29%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.10	25%	25 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.01	28%	25 Aug →
ancient	2–13	0.05	28%	25 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.09	33%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.05	22%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.08	56%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	9%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	23%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.17	25%	21 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.05	33%	21 Aug →
cache	16–13	0.08	28%	20 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	23%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.06	14%	20 Aug →
nuke	9–0	-0.04	60%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.09	35%	18 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	24%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.11	18%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.10	26%	12 Aug →
inferno	14–16	0.01	25%	12 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	20%	27 Jul →
nuke	2–6	-0.01	20%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.07	17%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	43%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.04	18%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–0	0.07	32%	27 Jul →
anubis	20–22	-0.04	15%	26 Jul →
anubis	14–16	0.02	28%	22 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	23%	22 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.00	43%	22 Jul →
anubis	4–8	0.01	25%	20 Jul →
boulder	10–13	-0.01	34%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.01	34%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.02	24%	20 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	22%	19 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.02	9%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.09	25%	17 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.05	23%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.03	26%	16 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.04	17%	15 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.08	22%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	25%	12 Jul →