Larry

Larry — CS2 Stats

76561198968931876[U:1:1008666148]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

428Tracked matches50%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,121 +1,205 16 Jul – 23 Jul · 2 days played
7,9169,121peak 9,12116 Jul23 Jul
9,121Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-05-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLarryFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning52
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–44–3Last 10053%Win rateLLWWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · +32ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility3.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.2
Utility3.0
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time573ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy11.6%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 11.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–4 · poseidon, 16 Jul →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 9–4 · poseidon, 16 Jul →
359msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · ancient, 16 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 2 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
9–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB2815–1354%-0.02
ancientB2110–1148%-0.02
mirageA138–562%-0.02
nukeS118–373%-0.00
infernoB84–450%-0.04
dust2D61–517%-0.02
cacheS65–183%0.01
vertigo—30–30%-0.09
poseidon—31–233%0.05
eldorado—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

272Matches
50%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
70.8ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis6749%0.9514.4
Mirage6047%0.9014.3
Ancient5052%0.8514.1
Nuke3751%0.8914.3
Cache2348%0.8613.8
Dust21644%0.7810.9
Inferno1560%0.7613.2
Overpass3100%0.8216.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.3%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
568msReaction time
26.3%T opening success
46.6%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
5.00HE damage / grenade
8.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.31% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4442 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.2935% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.0411%21 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.079%20 Aug →
anubis13–10.035%20 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0413%20 Aug →
nuke14–160.0215%18 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0618%18 Aug →
dust28–70.027%17 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0413%16 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0413%16 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.057%16 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.047%16 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0510%15 Aug →
ancient17–190.0118%15 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0417%15 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0111%13 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0412%12 Aug →
ancient13–50.0813%12 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.068%12 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.044%12 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0617%12 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0420%10 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0323%10 Aug →
ancient13–90.0511%10 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.026%10 Aug →
nuke13–100.0312%10 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0112%10 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.037%10 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0516%9 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.0813%9 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0216%9 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0510%9 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.022%7 Aug →
ancient8–130.018%7 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0412%5 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0113%5 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0616%5 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0530%5 Aug →
anubis13–100.0210%5 Aug →
vertigo11–13-0.046%5 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.009%5 Aug →
cache9–130.0219%4 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.117%4 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.039%4 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.018%3 Aug →
anubis12–160.0210%3 Aug →
anubis13–80.0318%3 Aug →
anubis13–110.0415%3 Aug →
mirage12–16-0.0111%3 Aug →
mirage13–100.0222%3 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.028%3 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0419%2 Aug →
cache16–140.0116%2 Aug →
anubis13–70.0914%2 Aug →
dust25–13-0.094%2 Aug →
dust213–00.0512%2 Aug →
anubis13–50.0212%2 Aug →
nuke13–50.0111%2 Aug →
nuke19–16-0.0018%2 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0119%30 Jul →
mirage13–70.0320%30 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0828%30 Jul →
nuke13–10.0531%30 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0220%29 Jul →
anubis5–130.0115%29 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0414%29 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0321%29 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0129%29 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0511%29 Jul →
anubis10–130.0325%29 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0218%28 Jul →
mirage13–70.0319%25 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0420%23 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.018%19 Jul →
poseidon8–80.0927%18 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0314%16 Jul →
ancient2–9-0.060%16 Jul →
poseidon6–9-0.0813%16 Jul →
poseidon9–40.1333%16 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0114%15 Jul →
cache13–30.0019%14 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0519%13 Jul →
eldorado9–70.0617%13 Jul →
vertigo3–9-0.2015%13 Jul →
cache13–50.0521%13 Jul →
nuke13–80.0512%10 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0914%24 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.036%23 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.0213%16 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.038%10 Jun →
vertigo8–8-0.0428%30 May →
inferno8–80.0310%29 May →
mirage13–8-0.0111%28 May →
inferno13–60.015%25 May →
ancient5–13-0.026%25 May →
inferno13–9-0.084%24 May →
dust22–11-0.0333%21 May →
inferno4–9-0.140%20 May →
cache13–40.0112%6 May →
anubis8–13-0.035%3 May →
inferno13–9-0.038%2 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.