Stáno369

Stáno369 — CS2 Stats

MC76561198966933151[U:1:1006667423]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,738Tracked matches32%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,793Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating27,176Top 5% of 215,248 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5910 of 261498 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,430 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,176 +157 25 Jul – 3 Nov · 31 days played
26,17629,089peak 29,08925 Jul3 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,430 +0 1 Sept – 16 Oct · 7 observations
1,4301,430peak 1,4301 Sept16 Oct
29,089Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,430Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-07-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,430
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 101 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,913 below peak (29,089)
  • +154 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,000 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,824 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches736−29
Win rate43%33%+10pp
K/D0.840.79+0.05
Headshot %70%71%−1pp

Measured 15 Oct 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; previous 12 Sep 2026 → 15 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate65.8%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy7.4%12.7%13.0%5.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.091.051.06above
Match win rate45.7%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStáno369FACEITLevel 7 · 1,430 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER27,176 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,430csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning42
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–52–2Last 10046%Win rateTLLLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · +51ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 669ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 20

  • 5–13–2 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.6
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.2
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time620ms+100ms
first ⅓ avg 520ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy33.0%−6.3%
first ⅓ avg 39.2% → last ⅓ avg 33.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–9 · train, 13 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · ancient, 14 Aug →
211msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · dust2, 9 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 17 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
2–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 70% over 10ancientWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2911–1838%-0.01
infernoC156–940%0.00
mirageB158–753%-0.01
anubisB136–746%-0.02
cacheS107–370%0.02
trainB63–350%0.03
ancientD50–50%-0.04
vertigo—42–250%0.05
nuke—33–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,484Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
3,415Matches
45.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
65.8%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 7 players
7.4%Shot accuracy
8,366MVPs
1,598Hours (in match)
4,815Bombs planted
814Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4726,199
AWP6,749
FAMAS3,065
MAC-101,507
MP71,330

Lifetime map wins

7,892dust2
4,700inferno
1,194vertigo
898nuke
455train
170office
35cbble
17lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

701Matches
50%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
86.5ADR
61%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust212454%1.2218.3
Inferno7658%1.3018.4
Ancient6733%1.0916.9
Mirage6344%1.0718.2
Anubis3043%1.1017.0
Overpass1867%1.3521.1
Cache1553%1.2117.3
Nuke367%1.8019.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

32.8%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.9%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
611msReaction time
34.8%T opening success
33.7%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
7.61HE damage / grenade
7.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.7748% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno12–12-0.0235%8 Nov →
dust24–130.0126%3 Nov →
ancient1–13-0.0439%3 Nov →
dust211–130.0529%2 Nov →
cache13–5-0.0232%27 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0926%15 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.0118%15 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0722%15 Oct →
inferno13–80.0633%10 Oct →
train8–130.0233%10 Oct →
train13–9-0.0329%10 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0340%10 Oct →
train9–13-0.0157%10 Oct →
train13–70.0444%9 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0133%3 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0633%3 Oct →
anubis1–130.0323%2 Oct →
vertigo13–70.0430%25 Sept →
vertigo3–13-0.0230%25 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.1318%25 Sept →
dust216–12-0.0722%25 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.0260%25 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.060%25 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0343%25 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0528%19 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0922%18 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0057%18 Sept →
dust213–0-0.0233%17 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0633%29 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0535%29 Aug →
cache9–130.0242%28 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0031%27 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.0650%27 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0537%23 Aug →
ancient0–13-0.07100%14 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0413%14 Aug →
mirage13–00.1028%14 Aug →
mirage13–10.0263%14 Aug →
train13–90.1951%13 Aug →
train10–13-0.0531%13 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0636%12 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0575%12 Aug →
inferno3–130.0627%10 Aug →
mirage1–4-0.04100%10 Aug →
dust20–130.00100%10 Aug →
inferno13–40.0639%10 Aug →
mirage3–130.0362%10 Aug →
dust213–40.0261%9 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0155%9 Aug →
dust213–10.0250%9 Aug →
dust20–13-0.04100%9 Aug →
anubis13–80.0531%9 Aug →
cache3–00.0360%9 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0136%9 Aug →
cache13–30.0541%8 Aug →
nuke13–100.0127%8 Aug →
mirage13–50.0229%8 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0133%8 Aug →
mirage13–100.0150%8 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0436%8 Aug →
cache13–100.0156%8 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0261%8 Aug →
dust211–130.0845%7 Aug →
mirage13–110.0447%7 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0725%5 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0078%5 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0650%2 Aug →
dust212–16-0.0137%1 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0279%1 Aug →
anubis13–60.0054%1 Aug →
ancient12–160.0241%1 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0229%1 Aug →
mirage13–00.0527%31 Jul →
cache13–60.0244%31 Jul →
anubis13–50.0523%31 Jul →
dust213–60.0138%31 Jul →
vertigo13–80.0832%29 Jul →
vertigo11–130.1131%29 Jul →
inferno13–80.0926%26 Jul →
anubis13–5-0.0522%26 Jul →
cache0–13-0.06100%26 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0444%26 Jul →
dust26–5-0.0028%26 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0130%26 Jul →
cache13–80.0429%26 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0238%26 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0228%26 Jul →
inferno2–130.0027%26 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0737%26 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0527%26 Jul →
inferno13–30.0637%26 Jul →
dust23–80.0447%26 Jul →
mirage13–30.0146%26 Jul →
cache8–130.0929%25 Jul →
anubis13–70.0430%25 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0536%25 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0341%25 Jul →
anubis2–13-0.0183%25 Jul →
ancient0–13-0.0414%25 Jul →
dust21–130.0458%25 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.