Alice:)

Alice:) — CS2 Stats

FI76561198962552745[U:1:1002287017]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,538Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,725Hours in CS32Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,758 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,758 → 1,758
+2Tracked matches · now 1,538
0.0ppWin rate · 63.3% → 63.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 58 days played since 23 Oct 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,548 -1,518 8 Nov – 28 Dec · 6 days played
11,54813,066peak 13,0668 Nov28 Dec
13,655Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,758Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
58Days played since 2025-10-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,758
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 243 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-23
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,086), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate42.7%46.8%48.3%5.5% short
Shot accuracy14.4%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.841.061.070.23 short
Match win rate46.2%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAlice:)FACEITLevel 8 · 1,758 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,758csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning47
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–42–1Last 10057%Win rateLLWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −2.6pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility6.1
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.7
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact9.4

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time632ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 28 Mar →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · dust2, 8 Nov →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · nuke, 19 Apr →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 3 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3117–1455%0.00
nukeA1610–663%0.01
infernoB147–750%0.00
dust2B126–650%0.01
ancientC104–640%0.02
anubisS54–180%0.01
train—43–175%0.00
cache—33–0100%0.03
overpass—32–167%0.02
vertigo—21–150%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

123,910Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
5,722Matches
46.2%Match win rate
42.7%Headshot %
14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
18,693MVPs
2,766Hours (in match)
3,568Bombs planted
4,629Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4737,931
AWP21,108
SG 5532,361
Knife2,159
AUG1,836

Lifetime map wins

13,041inferno
9,877nuke
8,410train
7,033dust2
3,298vertigo
455cbble
56lake
20ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,169Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
87.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage25654%1.1117.9
Nuke11754%1.0817.5
Inferno9745%0.9416.1
Dust26949%0.9916.2
Ancient5740%1.0016.0
Anubis5244%0.9917.8
Overpass5054%1.1017.8
Train1947%1.6116.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
39.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
637msReaction time
38.5%T opening success
47.0%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
11.48HE damage / grenade
12.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.4608% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–13-0.0414%21 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0215%20 Sept →
vertigo13–7-0.0110%6 Sept →
mirage13–90.0428%5 Sept →
ancient13–50.0812%5 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0313%4 Sept →
cache13–20.0520%3 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0218%2 Sept →
cache25–220.0415%10 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.034%27 Jul →
mirage7–130.0228%27 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0615%26 Jul →
nuke13–90.0327%26 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0316%11 Jul →
mirage19–17-0.0515%10 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.048%5 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0111%4 Jul →
mirage13–70.0219%4 Jul →
cache13–100.0115%25 Jun →
mirage3–13-0.1119%24 Jun →
ancient9–130.0221%24 Jun →
nuke13–110.0319%6 Jun →
mirage13–3-0.0120%6 Jun →
inferno7–130.0217%30 May →
nuke13–30.0512%17 May →
anubis13–110.1018%17 May →
inferno10–0-0.049%17 May →
inferno13–10-0.0514%16 May →
mirage19–160.0117%16 May →
ancient16–19-0.0112%16 May →
mirage7–13-0.036%15 May →
mirage2–13-0.0114%26 Apr →
mirage13–60.0927%24 Apr →
nuke13–8-0.0218%20 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0121%19 Apr →
mirage13–100.0522%19 Apr →
nuke13–4-0.0227%19 Apr →
ancient10–00.1131%19 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0520%18 Apr →
anubis19–150.0313%18 Apr →
mirage13–100.0110%18 Apr →
nuke13–100.0117%18 Apr →
dust216–130.0820%18 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0513%12 Apr →
ancient13–60.0321%12 Apr →
dust213–60.1012%11 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0211%11 Apr →
nuke13–90.0523%11 Apr →
nuke4–13-0.0813%10 Apr →
mirage13–30.0017%10 Apr →
overpass19–160.0218%5 Apr →
nuke13–70.0912%4 Apr →
ancient2–13-0.0212%4 Apr →
dust24–130.0311%4 Apr →
nuke12–16-0.0511%4 Apr →
mirage10–130.0120%2 Apr →
mirage13–90.1418%28 Mar →
nuke11–130.0716%1 Mar →
inferno13–110.0616%1 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0113%1 Mar →
nuke5–13-0.0424%28 Feb →
dust216–130.0419%28 Feb →
ancient6–130.0118%15 Feb →
mirage11–130.0612%1 Feb →
nuke25–220.0722%31 Jan →
inferno5–13-0.0210%31 Jan →
anubis13–90.0217%31 Jan →
overpass13–70.0419%25 Jan →
mirage2–130.0019%25 Jan →
inferno16–140.0019%25 Jan →
anubis10–13-0.0813%18 Jan →
inferno7–130.0116%28 Dec →
train5–13-0.0510%27 Dec →
ancient13–60.0317%27 Dec →
mirage9–13-0.0120%25 Dec →
train13–10-0.076%24 Dec →
dust26–13-0.0232%23 Dec →
mirage13–11-0.014%23 Dec →
train13–60.0725%23 Dec →
nuke6–130.0212%19 Dec →
inferno13–110.0323%19 Dec →
train13–100.0714%19 Dec →
inferno13–30.0616%16 Dec →
dust22–13-0.034%16 Dec →
overpass3–130.0119%16 Dec →
mirage13–50.0220%7 Dec →
dust210–13-0.0225%22 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0421%20 Nov →
mirage16–13-0.0119%20 Nov →
mirage13–40.0424%18 Nov →
mirage16–19-0.0316%16 Nov →
mirage16–140.0323%16 Nov →
vertigo8–80.0024%14 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0314%9 Nov →
dust213–110.0233%8 Nov →
dust213–8-0.0314%8 Nov →
inferno9–130.0111%8 Nov →
inferno13–70.0314%4 Nov →
mirage13–5-0.0314%1 Nov →
dust26–12-0.0216%23 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →