Frenk#

Frenk# — CS2 Stats

76561198951503013[U:1:991237285]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

428Tracked matches43%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,586 -412 24 Mar – 26 May · 16 days played
18,40320,501peak 20,50124 Mar26 May
20,501Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-03-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFrenk#FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning51
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–49–6Last 10045%Win rateTLLWLWLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 2–6–2 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 20

  • 6–12–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility4.6
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.1
Utility4.6
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time548ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 16 May →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–9 · mirage, 29 Jun →
391msFastest reaction time · 7–9 · inferno, 15 May →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 5 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
9–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 18infernoWeakest map · 35% over 48
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC4817–3135%0.01
mirageS1812–667%-0.01
dust2C188–1044%0.01
cache—41–325%-0.03
ancient—43–175%0.02
overpass—42–250%-0.01
nuke—21–150%-0.01
anubis—21–150%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 48). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

98Matches
51%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
81.2ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23253%1.1515.9
Cache2259%1.2217.8
Ancient1735%1.2018.5
Mirage1155%1.1218.0
Inferno1050%1.0715.0
Nuke250%0.9215.5
Anubis20%0.7714.0
Overpass2100%1.3216.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.0%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.0%Spray accuracy
71.7%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
578msReaction time
31.2%T opening success
53.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
9.21HE damage / grenade
6.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.9834% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.2284% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 48 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–8-0.049%17 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0519%14 Jul →
inferno6–130.096%14 Jul →
inferno9–70.0512%5 Jul →
inferno7–9-0.0513%5 Jul →
inferno9–30.0520%5 Jul →
mirage0–9-0.1050%29 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0412%29 Jun →
inferno8–80.119%11 Jun →
inferno7–9-0.043%11 Jun →
inferno9–7-0.0221%10 Jun →
mirage13–60.0715%9 Jun →
inferno4–9-0.1225%8 Jun →
inferno5–9-0.127%8 Jun →
inferno4–9-0.1018%8 Jun →
inferno9–50.0424%8 Jun →
inferno3–9-0.1710%8 Jun →
inferno5–90.0313%8 Jun →
inferno9–70.0218%8 Jun →
inferno5–9-0.0519%8 Jun →
mirage16–14-0.0412%26 May →
inferno8–80.0716%25 May →
inferno9–7-0.0114%25 May →
inferno6–90.0214%21 May →
inferno9–60.157%21 May →
inferno7–9-0.1313%21 May →
inferno9–130.0820%20 May →
dust28–13-0.035%17 May →
inferno9–50.2124%17 May →
inferno9–60.044%17 May →
inferno9–20.2418%16 May →
inferno7–90.0617%16 May →
inferno9–60.0814%16 May →
inferno5–9-0.0240%15 May →
inferno2–9-0.0922%15 May →
inferno7–9-0.0117%15 May →
inferno6–90.0810%14 May →
cache6–13-0.045%14 May →
ancient9–130.038%13 May →
dust215–190.0310%13 May →
mirage9–13-0.036%13 May →
inferno8–8-0.0417%13 May →
inferno2–9-0.2114%13 May →
inferno8–80.0328%12 May →
inferno7–90.0636%8 May →
inferno9–70.1117%8 May →
inferno9–20.0610%8 May →
mirage5–13-0.0611%5 May →
dust213–20.0529%5 May →
inferno9–40.1010%2 May →
cache13–9-0.0410%29 Apr →
cache11–130.0014%26 Apr →
mirage13–50.022%26 Apr →
overpass0–7-0.040%26 Apr →
nuke16–130.0312%25 Apr →
ancient13–50.069%25 Apr →
dust210–130.0217%24 Apr →
inferno9–10.0738%24 Apr →
nuke2–4-0.0425%22 Apr →
mirage13–100.0117%22 Apr →
inferno7–130.0614%22 Apr →
ancient13–110.004%21 Apr →
dust26–13-0.0111%21 Apr →
dust213–60.0822%17 Apr →
overpass13–90.0310%17 Apr →
dust213–3-0.026%17 Apr →
mirage13–100.089%17 Apr →
inferno9–30.149%17 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0117%17 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0426%16 Apr →
inferno13–80.0110%16 Apr →
dust213–60.0220%16 Apr →
inferno6–9-0.0824%16 Apr →
inferno11–130.0720%16 Apr →
mirage13–50.066%16 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0111%15 Apr →
dust214–160.0025%15 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0135%15 Apr →
mirage13–90.0613%15 Apr →
mirage1–13-0.0711%14 Apr →
dust26–130.0112%14 Apr →
dust210–130.027%14 Apr →
mirage13–6-0.0330%14 Apr →
anubis11–130.0710%14 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.065%14 Apr →
dust213–110.0320%13 Apr →
mirage13–6-0.0413%13 Apr →
anubis13–8-0.006%13 Apr →
overpass10–13-0.0520%13 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0410%10 Apr →
mirage13–60.0113%10 Apr →
dust213–90.009%10 Apr →
dust213–2-0.0318%28 Mar →
mirage13–90.0312%27 Mar →
mirage13–7-0.0228%24 Mar →
dust213–80.048%24 Mar →
inferno15–150.0012%24 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0216%24 Mar →
overpass16–140.0413%24 Mar →
ancient13–8-0.0217%24 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.