Planko

Planko — CS2 Stats

AU76561198951396984[U:1:991131256]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,136Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
719Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating27,194Top 5% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4996 of 251234 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,359 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+50Premier CS Rating · 27,144 → 27,194

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,194 +3,087 31 Aug – 11 Oct · 16 days played
24,10727,194peak 27,19431 Aug11 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,359 +0 31 Aug – 18 Sept · 5 observations
1,3591,359peak 1,35931 Aug18 Sept
27,194Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,359Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
13Days played since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,359
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 172 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 27,194
  • +1,063 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,806 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-11
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches296——
Win rate55%——
K/D1.12——
Headshot %64%——

Measured 11 Sep 2026 → 11 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,332), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate64.0%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy2.6%13.3%13.7%11.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.141.071.09above
Match win rate44.7%46.9%48.4%3.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPlankoFACEITLevel 9 · 1,359 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER27,194 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,359csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning72
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54–38–8Last 10054%Win rateLLLTLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +4.4pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–4–1 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility4.6
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 70% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning7.2
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels8.2
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time526ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 530ms → last ⅓ avg 526ms
Headshot accuracy30.2%−6.3%
first ⅓ avg 36.5% → last ⅓ avg 30.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 7–8 · rush_001, 4 Oct →
75%Best headshot accuracy · 1–3 · dust2, 5 Oct →
313msFastest reaction time · 1–3 · dust2, 5 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 29 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA1811–761%0.03
dust2A1811–761%0.04
nukeB137–654%0.01
anubisS96–367%0.05
ancientS96–367%0.02
infernoD82–625%0.03
cacheC73–443%0.04
vertigoB63–350%0.03
trainC52–340%0.05
rush_001—42–250%0.11
office—21–150%0.06
shelter—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

46,674Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
2,190Matches
44.7%Match win rate
64.0%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 9 players
2.6%Shot accuracy
6,345MVPs
719Hours (in match)
1,220Bombs planted
666Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,770dust2
1,893inferno
1,176nuke
873vertigo
327office
287train
38italy
20militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

257Matches
54%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
88.2ADR
61%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6952%1.1417.2
Dust26562%1.1418.1
Ancient3043%1.2217.7
Cache2756%1.2117.7
Inferno2250%1.3919.6
Anubis2065%1.3019.6
Nuke1942%1.1317.9
Vertigo333%0.9514.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.3%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
526msReaction time
69.6%T opening success
56.3%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
6.24HE damage / grenade
9.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4606 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–13-0.0427%11 Oct →
mirage4–130.0225%11 Oct →
anubis8–130.0026%11 Oct →
train12–120.0841%11 Oct →
dust25–130.0147%11 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0130%11 Oct →
inferno4–130.0050%11 Oct →
nuke13–30.1028%11 Oct →
dust29–130.1037%11 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0425%11 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0238%10 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0226%10 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0518%10 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0233%10 Oct →
mirage7–130.0221%10 Oct →
dust213–40.0429%10 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0427%10 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0227%10 Oct →
mirage13–40.0547%9 Oct →
dust26–130.0524%9 Oct →
anubis13–20.0723%9 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0422%9 Oct →
dust213–90.1543%9 Oct →
anubis13–80.0325%9 Oct →
ancient16–140.0332%9 Oct →
nuke2–130.0330%9 Oct →
ancient13–100.0119%9 Oct →
inferno7–130.0234%8 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0233%7 Oct →
shelter9–13-0.0230%7 Oct →
anubis11–130.0627%7 Oct →
cache13–90.0320%7 Oct →
cache14–160.0336%7 Oct →
nuke7–130.067%7 Oct →
nuke13–60.0138%6 Oct →
dust27–130.0124%6 Oct →
ancient8–130.0017%6 Oct →
dust213–30.1535%6 Oct →
cache13–40.0025%6 Oct →
nuke13–100.0625%6 Oct →
inferno13–30.1333%6 Oct →
dust21–3-0.0275%5 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0224%5 Oct →
vertigo13–30.0533%5 Oct →
dust213–70.0325%5 Oct →
office13–70.1139%5 Oct →
nuke7–7-0.0532%5 Oct →
vertigo9–130.0324%5 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0643%5 Oct →
mirage7–130.0941%5 Oct →
train12–12-0.0534%4 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0132%4 Oct →
dust213–90.0340%4 Oct →
anubis13–70.1145%4 Oct →
office7–130.0035%4 Oct →
mirage13–50.0731%4 Oct →
vertigo8–130.0539%4 Oct →
cache6–130.0940%4 Oct →
inferno12–120.1029%4 Oct →
mirage13–90.1546%4 Oct →
cache5–130.0825%4 Oct →
rush_0017–80.2528%4 Oct →
rush_0017–80.0421%4 Oct →
mirage6–130.0446%3 Oct →
dust25–130.0527%3 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0122%3 Oct →
vertigo12–120.0131%2 Oct →
dust213–50.0849%2 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0225%2 Oct →
ancient12–12-0.0129%2 Oct →
mirage13–90.0230%2 Oct →
inferno7–130.0518%2 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0242%2 Oct →
ancient13–70.0335%2 Oct →
vertigo13–50.0225%2 Oct →
dust213–90.0429%2 Oct →
ancient13–10.0127%2 Oct →
nuke6–130.0438%2 Oct →
train13–50.1329%1 Oct →
nuke13–110.0335%1 Oct →
vertigo13–110.0532%1 Oct →
cache12–120.0243%1 Oct →
train12–120.0632%1 Oct →
ancient13–90.0726%1 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0154%1 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0355%30 Sept →
train13–110.0651%30 Sept →
rush_0018–60.1516%30 Sept →
rush_0018–60.0163%30 Sept →
mirage8–30.0937%30 Sept →
dust213–70.0435%30 Sept →
anubis13–30.1736%30 Sept →
anubis13–160.0434%29 Sept →
cache13–50.0542%29 Sept →
ancient13–40.0432%29 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0429%29 Sept →
nuke15–150.0226%29 Sept →
anubis13–50.0230%29 Sept →
mirage13–00.1471%29 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0053%29 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.